Governor agrees to coal plant compromise


Protective Relay Training - Basic

Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.

  • Live Online
  • 12 hours Instructor-led
  • Group Training Available
Regular Price:
$699
Coupon Price:
$599
Reserve Your Seat Today
The Sunflower Electric Power CorporationÂ’s proposal for a cleaner coal plant in southwest Kansas has been passed, according to Sunflower Electric.

Governor Mark Parkinson signed a renewable energy bill as part of his agreement to overcome the 19-month feud between Sunflower and the governor's office.

The new deal allows the construction of a coal-powered plant — though one much smaller than the original plans called for — outside of Holcomb, Kan. The bill also calls for renewable energy sources, like wind, to provide 20 percent of the public utilities' electricity by 2020.

ParkinsonÂ’s plan also includes updates for transmission lines. This will allow the current wind farms to tie in to the new system.

“We’re not going to be able to fully develop the wind capacity in Kansas unless we have transmission capability,” said House Speaker Mike O'Neal, R-Hutchinson.

According to a Sunflower press release, the corporation will be allowed to build an 895-megawatt plant, with enough storage to provide power to approximately 448,000 households. Sunflower agreed to work toward off-setting potential carbon-dioxide emissions, which are estimated to be 6.7 million tons per year.

Sunflower had applied for a permit in 2006 to build its plant with three generating units at 2,100 megawatts. They were denied early due to carbon emissions, and the company fought for two years at the state level before the agreement was reached.

The Environmental Protection Agency determined that too much about this project has been altered to allow Sunflower to move ahead with its initial permit, according to David Bryan, spokesman for the EPA's regional office in Kansas City.

“We believe the proposal by Sunflower is a new project,” Bryan said. “That means we expect a public comment period, a technical analysis, all the things that need to be done.”

Related News

UK EV Drivers Demand Fairer Vehicle Taxes

UK EV Per-Mile Taxes are reshaping road pricing and vehicle taxation for electric cars, raising…
View more

Hydro One delivery rates go up

Hydro One Rate Hike reflects Ontario Energy Board approval for higher delivery charges, impacting seasonal…
View more

Germany - A needed nuclear option for climate change

Germany Nuclear Debate Amid Energy Crisis highlights nuclear power vs coal and natural gas, renewables…
View more

Advocates call for change after $2.9 million surplus revealed for BC Hydro fund

BC Hydro Customer Crisis Fund Surplus highlights unused grants, pilot program imbalance, and calls to…
View more

Is Ontario's Power Cost-Effective?

Ontario Nuclear Power Costs highlight LCOE, capex, refurbishment outlays, and waste management, compared with renewables,…
View more

Elizabeth May wants a fully renewable electricity grid by 2030. Is that possible?

Green Party Mission Possible 2030 outlines a rapid transition to renewable energy, electric vehicles, carbon…
View more

Sign Up for Electricity Forum’s Newsletter

Stay informed with our FREE Newsletter — get the latest news, breakthrough technologies, and expert insights, delivered straight to your inbox.

Electricity Today T&D Magazine Subscribe for FREE

Stay informed with the latest T&D policies and technologies.
  • Timely insights from industry experts
  • Practical solutions T&D engineers
  • Free access to every issue

Download the 2026 Electrical Training Catalog

Explore 50+ live, expert-led electrical training courses –

  • Interactive
  • Flexible
  • CEU-cerified