Punjab power plant politically motivated


High Voltage Maintenance Training Online

Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.

  • Live Online
  • 12 hours Instructor-led
  • Group Training Available
Regular Price:
$599
Coupon Price:
$499
Reserve Your Seat Today

Sindh-Punjab water dispute over CJ Link Canal intensifies as IRSA diverts 5,000 cusecs from the Indus River to Chashma-Jhelum, sparking interprovincial tensions over water allocation, NEPRA licensing, and the 1991 Water Accord.

 

Breaking Down the Details

A dispute over IRSA's 5,000-cusec Indus diversion to CJ Link Canal, contested on legal issues and provincial equity.

  • IRSA diverting 5,000 cusecs Indus water to CJ Link Canal
  • Sindh alleges unjust distribution; plans legal challenge
  • Historic accords required surplus-based CJ operations

 

The Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) government in Punjab has “political motives” behind initiating the perceived unfeasible 44 megawatt power plant on Chashma-Jhelum Link Canal, according to Sindh Minister for Irrigation and Power Murad Ali Shah.

 

“They (PML-N) want to damage the vote bank of PPP in two provinces by creating acrimony among the provinces,” the minister told Sindh Assembly. He said that the Sindh government has taken up the issue of power plant with Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani as industries face a 1,400MW power shortage nationwide today. He, however, added that the problem lies with Indus River System Authority (Irsa).

He alleged that Irsa was not distributing water among the provinces judiciously. “We cannot respect institutions if they snatch rights or democracy from the people,” declared Murad Shah. He opined that Chashma-Jhelum (CJ) canal power plant would also be damaging for Punjab as at present water flow to D.G. Canal and Muzaffar Garh Canal has been stopped to divert 5,000 cusecs water daily to the CJ canal, while hydropower maintenance threatens national supply. He said that the Balochistan government has sacked its representative in Irsa on February 12, who had voted in favour of opening the CJ canal by neglecting his province’s interests. He believed that legal complications will remain until the federal government issues a notification in this regard.

He alleged that the sacked representative of Balochistan in Irsa wanted to trigger confrontation among the provinces. But, he added, the Balochistan government immediately realized the gravity of the situation and rectified it. He said that Irsa had mala fide intentions behind its decision to transfer 5,000 cusecs water daily from Indus River to the CJ link canal. He announced that Sindh would fight a legal battle to reverse this decision, even as officials tout coal reserves as part of the solution today.

In his lengthy statement before the house, the irrigation minister also traced history of water dispute between Sindh and Punjab starting from 1945. He said that from 1948 till 1960, “weak” federal governments tended to give money to India to get water from rivers, even as later years saw a huge hydroelectric power plant opened to expand supply nationwide. He claimed that India’s interests dominated in that treaty, adding that Sindh was not a part of that treaty and subsequently Punjab focused its attention towards River Indus.

Murad Ali Shah said that the work on the CJ canal was also started by the then dictator and it was completed in 1971. He recalled that later the democratic government had set up the “Akbar Commission” to get Sindh’s opinion. It was decided at that time that water would be transferred to the CJ canal only when there would be surplus water in Indus and shortage in Jhelum. He said that the then chief minister Sindh and governor Punjab also signed an agreement in 1972 under which “explicit permission” of Sindh chief minister was required each year to open the CJ canal. It was followed till 1985 when another military dictator stopped getting permission, he added, even as planners later aimed to add more than 5,000 MW to the grid.

The minister said that the Water Accord of 1991 also did not mention the CJ link canal, hence there was no water share for it in the accord. He said that the work on the CJ canal power plant was initiated by another military ruler in November 2007, adding, National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (Nepra) issued ads in newspapers on June 20, 2009, inviting objections. Murad Shah said that the Sindh government objected to it on June 27, as controversies over CPEC power producers grew, followed by another letter written by the chief minister to the premier on July 7.

Nepra started NEPRA hearings in August and September, he said and added that the Sindh government filed a review petition before Nepra on February 11, urging it to reconsider its decision to issue licence to a private power producer for setting up the plant. The minister claimed that no licence has so far been issued, adding, the Sindh government has also taken up this matter with the prime minister. Culture Minister Sassui Palijo and Humera Alwani also spoke and criticized the project and the PML-N.

 

Related News

Related News

Jordan approves MOU to implement Jordan-Saudi Arabia electricity linkage

Jordan-Saudi Electricity Linkage Project connects NEPCO and Saudi National Electricity Company to launch feasibility studies,…
View more

Texas utility companies waiving fees; city has yet to act

Texas Utility COVID-19 Relief suspends disconnections, waives late fees, extends payment plans, and supports broadband…
View more

Aging U.S. power grid threatens progress on renewables, EVs

U.S. Grid Modernization is critical for renewable energy integration, EV adoption, climate resilience, and reliability,…
View more

Honda Accelerates Electric Vehicle Push with Massive Investment in Ontario

Honda Ontario EV Investment accelerates electric vehicle manufacturing in Canada, adding a battery plant, EV…
View more

BC residents split on going nuclear for electricity generation: survey

BC Energy Debate: Nuclear Power and LNG divides British Columbia, as a new survey weighs…
View more

Stop the Shock campaign seeks to bring back Canadian coal power

Alberta Electricity Price Hikes spotlight grid reliability, renewable transition, coal phase-out, and energy poverty, as…
View more

Sign Up for Electricity Forum’s Newsletter

Stay informed with our FREE Newsletter — get the latest news, breakthrough technologies, and expert insights, delivered straight to your inbox.

Electricity Today T&D Magazine Subscribe for FREE

Stay informed with the latest T&D policies and technologies.
  • Timely insights from industry experts
  • Practical solutions T&D engineers
  • Free access to every issue

Live Online & In-person Group Training

Advantages To Instructor-Led Training – Instructor-Led Course, Customized Training, Multiple Locations, Economical, CEU Credits, Course Discounts.

Request For Quotation

Whether you would prefer Live Online or In-Person instruction, our electrical training courses can be tailored to meet your company's specific requirements and delivered to your employees in one location or at various locations.