High Voltage Maintenance Training Online
Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.
- Live Online
- 12 hours Instructor-led
- Group Training Available
CPS Energy nuclear expansion proposes reactors at the South Texas Project near Bay City with NRG Energy, funded by bond financing and rate increases, pending NRC licensing, amid concerns cost overruns and excess power sales.
Main Details
A CPS and NRG plan to add reactors at South Texas Project, funded by bonds and rate hikes, awaiting NRC approval.
- $10-13B reactors at South Texas Project
- CPS holds 40 percent; NRG owns remainder
- 5 percent rate hikes every other year
- Bond issuance requires City Council approval
Two additional nuclear reactors being considered by San Antonio's public utility will cost up to $13 billion, according to new cost estimates.
CPS Energy officials want to build the $10 billion to $13 billion reactors at the South Texas Project outside Bay City in Matagorda County as proposed, saying its the most cost effective way to get additional power. CPS Energy owns 40 percent of the project. New Jersey-based NRG Energy owns the remaining portion, and the utilities would split the cost.
San Antonio ratepayers would be hit with a 5 percent rate increase every other year for the next decade to pay for the expansion, officials said Monday. But that rate projection assumes CPS can sell excess power to other utilities, as the city is at the center of a nuclear debate over the plan, something critics are wary of.
"We believe the long-term lowest price option is nuclear," said Steve Bartley, CPS interim general manager, noting TEPCO interest in the Texas project. "Even if we decide not to move forward, we will have a need for bill increases over the next 10 years."
Business groups have supported the nuclear expansion, but others have warned that, with NRG considering walking away from expansion plans in some scenarios, the project could easily suffer from cost overruns.
"My confidence level about the $13 billion figure is about a 6 or a 7 on a scale of 1 to 10," said City Councilman John Clamp. "That amount can only go up. We need to do some more risk analysis."
The City Council would need to agree to issue bonds, following a utility settlement related to the plant, to help fund the construction. If approved, building wouldn't likely start until at least 2012, when the Nuclear Regulatory Commission is expected to grant a license for the expansion.
Related News
Related News
State-owned electricity generation firm could save Britons nearly 21bn a year?
Canada expected to miss its 2035 clean electricity goals
Opinion: Germany's drive for renewable energy is a cautionary tale
Latvia eyes electricity from Belarus nuclear plant
Climate Solution: Use Carbon Dioxide to Generate Electricity
The Banker Trying to Fix the UK's Electricity Grid
Sign Up for Electricity Forum’s Newsletter
Stay informed with our FREE Newsletter — get the latest news, breakthrough technologies, and expert insights, delivered straight to your inbox.
Electricity Today T&D Magazine Subscribe for FREE
- Timely insights from industry experts
- Practical solutions T&D engineers
- Free access to every issue