Germany blocks Vattenfall Brunsbuettel reactor plan


Electrical Commissioning In Industrial Power Systems

Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.

  • Live Online
  • 12 hours Instructor-led
  • Group Training Available
Regular Price:
$599
Coupon Price:
$499
Reserve Your Seat Today
Germany's environment ministry denied approval for nuclear operator Vattenfall Europe to keep its Brunsbuettel reactor open longer, a fresh blow to operators' attempts of getting around a national closure plan.

Vattenfall in May 2007 had asked to transfer 15 terawatt hours of power production quotas from its nuclear plant at Kruemmel in north Germany to Brunsbuettel, in order to lengthen Brunsbuettel's life cycle by another two-and-a-half years.

Both plants have been shut since the summer of 2007 after a safety-related incident and will have to be re-fitted to higher safety standards, which automatically adds to their remaining running time under Germany's nuclear exit program.

"...Brunsbuettel has even lower safety reserves than... Kruemmel," said environment minister Sigmar Gabriel in a statement.

Germany's remaining 17 reactors have used over half their allowances to produce a finite amount of electricity up to 2021 under the deal between the industry and government, which came into force in 2002.

Operators may shift remaining quotas from older nuclear plants to younger ones without approval, in line with the deal's intention to foster nuclear safety and eliminate risks.

But the ministry must consider and rule on their intentions to transfer volumes in the other direction, which would be the case for Vattenfall's two northern plants.

Gabriel, a member of the Social Democrats, the leading party behind the exit deal, has rejected all such plans.

They included RWE's application to transfer quotas from its Lingen reactor in Emsland to its Biblis plant in Hesse and EnBW's attempt to seek clearance for a plan to shift quotas from its Neckar 2 reactor to number 1 at the same plant.

The operators argue the deal needs reversing as anti-nuclear sentiment, which led to its emergence, shifts back in favor due to the technology's economics and near zero carbon emissions.

They are biding their time, hoping for a policy change in September if conservative parties win national elections.

Related News

Groups clash over NH hydropower project

Northern Pass Hydropower Project Rehearing faces review by New Hampshire's Site Evaluation Committee as Eversource…
View more

US power coalition demands action to deal with Coronavirus

Renewable Energy Tax Incentive Extensions urged by US trade groups to offset COVID-19 supply chain…
View more

Solar power is the red-hot growth area in oil-rich Alberta

Alberta Solar Power is accelerating as renewable energy investment, PPAs, and utility-scale projects expand the…
View more

Improve US national security, step away from fossil fuels

American Green Energy Independence accelerates electrification and renewable energy, leveraging solar, wind, and EVs to…
View more

Ontario Government Unveils Energy Conservation Changes

Ontario’s government under Doug Ford is overhauling environmental and energy policy, merging conservation authorities, greenlighting…
View more

$1.6 Billion Battery Plant Charges Niagara Region for Electric Vehicle Future

Ontario EV Battery Separator Plant anchors Canada's EV supply chain, with Asahi Kasei producing lithium-ion…
View more

Sign Up for Electricity Forum’s Newsletter

Stay informed with our FREE Newsletter — get the latest news, breakthrough technologies, and expert insights, delivered straight to your inbox.

Electricity Today T&D Magazine Subscribe for FREE

Stay informed with the latest T&D policies and technologies.
  • Timely insights from industry experts
  • Practical solutions T&D engineers
  • Free access to every issue

Download the 2026 Electrical Training Catalog

Explore 50+ live, expert-led electrical training courses –

  • Interactive
  • Flexible
  • CEU-cerified