Solar Power Controller

Solar power generators integrate photovoltaic panels, MPPT charge controllers, pure sine wave inverters, and lithium-ion battery storage to deliver off-grid backup power, efficient DC-AC conversion, and scalable kWh capacity for portable and residential systems.

What Are Solar Power Generators?

Solar power generators convert PV to AC using MPPT, inverters, and batteries for reliable off-grid power.

✅ MPPT charge control maximizes PV power under changing irradiance.

✅ Pure sine inverters convert DC to AC with low THD.

✅ Size battery capacity for surge current, depth of discharge, kWh.

Generators

A key component of off‑grid systems is the generator (Figure 1). Generators (also referred to as'en‑sets") are used to charge batteries during periods of low insolation. They are also used to equalize batteries and to provide power when extraordinary loads are used ‑ for example, welders ‑ that would exceed the output of the inverter. Finally, gen‑sets may be used to provide backup power if the inverter or some other vital component breaks down. Although a battery‑charging gen‑set may not be required in hybrid systems with good solar and wind resources, most off‑grid homes and businesses have one.

For a holistic view of how gensets support storage and load management, review this primer on off-grid solar power systems to see where backup generation typically fits.

Gen‑sets for homes and businesses are usually rather small, around 4,000 to 7,000 watts. Generators smaller than this are gen­erally not adequate for battery charging.

Proper sizing also depends on the charger and inverter, and guides on solar power inverters can help align generator output with battery charging requirements.

Generators can be powered by gasoline, diesel, propane, or nat­ural gas. By far the most common gen‑sets used in off‑grid systems are gasoline‑powered. They're widely available and inexpensive. Gas‑powered generators consist of a small gas engine that drives the generator. Like all generators, they produce AC electricity.

In many hybrid renewable energy systems, fuel choice is balanced against maintenance, emissions, and fuel logistics to keep overall lifecycle costs reasonable.

Fig.1: Portable gen‑sets like these commonly run on gasoline.

Gas‑powered generators operate at 3,600 rpm and, as a result, tend to wear out pretty quickly. Although the lifespan depends on the amount of use, don't expect more than five years from a heav­ily used gas‑powered gen‑set. You may find yourself making an occasional costly repair from time to time as well.

When paired with a well-designed solar PV system, generator runtime and wear can drop substantially during high-insolation seasons.

Because they operate at such high rpms, gas‑powered gen‑sets are also rather noisy; however, Honda makes some models that are remarkably quiet (they contain excellent mufflers). If you have neighbors, you'll very likely need to build a sound‑muting genera­tor shed to reduce noise levels, even if you do install a quiet model. And don't think about adding an additional muffler to a conven­tional gas‑powered generator. If an engine is not designed for one, adding one could damage it.

Homeowners evaluating acoustic impacts often weigh the pros and cons of solar power as a way to offset run hours and neighborhood disturbance.

If you're looking for a quieter, more efficient generator, you may want to. consider one with a natural gas or propane engine. Large‑sized units ‑ around 10,000 watts or higher ‑ operate at 1,800 rpm and are quieter than their less expensive gas‑powered coun­terparts. Lower speed translates into longer lifespan and less noise. Natural gas and propane are also cleaner burning fuels than gaso­line. Unlike gas‑powered generators, natural gas and propane generators require no fuel handling by you, but you could end up paying several times more for a natural gas or propane generator than for a comparable gas‑powered unit.

These fuels are common in standby configurations within broader alternative energy systems, especially where fuel delivery is reliable year-round.

Another efficient and reliable option to consider is a diesel generator. Diesel engines tend to be much more rugged than gas‑powered engines and tend to operate without problems and for long periods. Diesel generators are also more efficient than gas‑powered generators. Although diesel generators offer many advantages over gas‑powered generators, they cost more than their gas‑powered cousins. And, of course, you will have to fill the tank from time to time. They're also not as clean burning as natural gas or propane gen‑sets.

Comparing generator options alongside storage upgrades and PV expansion is a core consideration in renewable alternative energy planning for remote sites.

Related Articles

• Solar Power Channel

Advantages of solar power include high-efficiency photovoltaic systems, clean renewable energy, low O&M costs, grid integration with inverters and MPPT, distributed generation, net metering benefits, and improved resilience via energy storage and microgrids.

What Are the Advantages of Solar Power?

They enable efficient, low-emission supply, lower LCOE, reduce peaks, and improve grid reliability via storage.

✅ Distributed generation lowers feeder losses and voltage drops.

✅ MPPT inverters optimize DC-AC conversion and power quality.

✅ Solar plus storage enables peak shaving and frequency support.

Although solar electricity, like any fuel, has some downsides, they're clearly not insurmountable and, many believe, they are outweighed by their advantages. One of the most important advantages is that solar energy is an abundant, renewable resource. While natural gas, Oil, coal, and nuclear fuels are finite and on the decline, solar energy will be available to us as long as the Sun continues to shine ‑ for at least 5 billion years. For a broader context on trade-offs, see this solar power pros and cons overview that compares benefits and limitations in practical terms.

Solar energy is a clean energy resource, too. By reducing our reliance on coal‑fired power plants, solar electricity could help homeowners and businesses reduce their contribution to a host of environmental problems, among them acid rain, global climate change, habitat destruction, and species extinction. Solar electric­ity could even replace costly, environmentally risky nuclear power plants. Nuclear power plants cost upwards of $6 to $ billion, and no long term solution has been enacted to store the high‑level radioac­tive waste they produce. Additional background on how renewables mitigate pollution is outlined in this guide to renewable energy sources that highlights lifecycle impacts.

Solar energy could help us decrease our reliance on declining and costly supplies of fossil fuels like natural gas. Solar could also help us decrease our reliance on oil. Although very little electricity in the United States comes from oil, electricity generated by solar electric systems could be used to power electric or plug‑in hybrid cars and trucks, reducing our demand for gasoline and diesel fuel, both of which come from oil. And, although the production of solar electric systems does have its impacts, all in all it is a relatively benign technology compared to fossil fuel and nuclear power plants. As transportation electrifies, insights on alternative energy power can help consumers plan charging and efficiency.

Another benefit of solar electricity is that, unlike oil, coal, and nuclear energy, the fuel is free. Moreover, solar energy is not owned or controlled by hostile foreign states or one of the dozen or so influential energy companies that largely dictate energy policy, espe­cially in the United States. Because the fuel is free and will remain so, solar energy can provide a hedge against inflation, caused in part by ever‑increasing fuel costs. For policymakers, curated alternative energy solutions illustrate market mechanisms that stabilize costs.

An increasing reliance on solar and wind energy could also ease political tensions worldwide. Solar and other renewable energy resources could alleviate the need for costly military operations aimed at stabilizing the Mideast, a region where the largest oil reserves reside. Because the Sun is not owned or controlled by the Middle East, we'll never fight a war over solar or other renewable energy resources. Not a drop of human blood will be shed to ensure a steady supply of solar energy to fuel our economy. Understanding diverse forms of alternative energy also clarifies how energy diversity reduces geopolitical risk.

Yet another advantage of solar‑generated electricity is that it uses existing infrastructure ‑ the electrical grid ‑ and technolo­gies in use today such as electric toasters, microwaves, and the like. A transition to solar electricity could occur fairly seamlessly. Grid integration best practices and alternative energy solar power case studies show how adoption can proceed with minimal disruption.

Solar electricity is also modular. You can add on to a system over time. If you can only afford a small system, you can start small and expand your system as money becomes available. Homeowners exploring upgrades can consult resources on renewable alternative energy to plan phased system expansions.

Solar electricity could provide substantial economic benefits for local, state, and regional economies. And solar electricity does not require extensive use of water, an increasing problem for coal, nuclear, and gas‑fired power plants, particularly in the western United States and in and regions.

Related Articles

• Solar Power Channel

Solar power batteries store photovoltaic energy for off-grid and grid-tied systems, using lithium-ion cells, BMS, and inverters to deliver reliable backup power, peak shaving, and efficient AC/DC energy storage and microgrid applications.

What Are Solar Power Batteries?

Solar power batteries are engineered storage systems that capture PV energy, stabilize loads, and supply backup power.

✅ Integrates with inverters, MPPT charge controllers, and BMS.

✅ Key specs: kWh capacity, C-rate, depth of discharge, cycle life.

✅ Supports peak shaving, UPS, and microgrid islanding operations.

Flooded Lead Acid Batteries

Batteries used in most off‑grid renewable energy systems are deep‑cycle flooded lead‑acid batteries. These batteries can be charged and discharged (cycled) hundreds of times before they wear out. In many homestead and remote installations, these storage banks are paired with off-grid solar power systems to ensure consistent charging throughout varying weather.

Lead‑acid batteries contain three separate 2‑volt compartments, known as cells. Inside each cell is a series of thick parallel lead plates (Figure1). The cells are connected internally (wired in series) so that they produce 6‑volt electricity. The space between the plates is filled with sulfuric acid (hence the term "flooded"). A partition wall separates each cell, so that fluid cannot flow from one cell to the next. The cells are encased in a heavy‑duty plastic case. Within broader renewable energy systems used in remote sites, this rugged construction helps batteries withstand cycling and temperature swings.

As illustrated in Figure1, lead acid batteries contain two types of plates: positive and negative. The positive plates connect to a posi­tive metal post or terminal; the negative plates connect to a negative post. The posts allow electricity to flow in and out of batteries. Because the output is direct current, integration with solar power inverters is required to supply standard AC loads safely.

Fig. 1: Anatomy of a Flooded Lead‑Acid Battery

The positive plates of lead‑acid batteries are made from lead dioxide (Pb02). The negative plates are made from pure lead. The sulfuric acid that fills the spaces between the plates is referred to as the electrolyte.

How Lead‑Acid Batteries Work

When used with photovoltaic arrays, charging current originates at the modules whose output is determined by the physics of photovoltaic cells and their exposure conditions.

Like all other types of batteries, lead‑acid batteries convert electri­cal energy into chemical energy when they are charged. When discharging, that is, giving off electricity, chemical energy is con­verted back into electricity. The chemical reactions that take place during battery discharge are shown in Figure 2. To prevent overcharge or excessive discharge during these cycles, systems employ solar power controllers that regulate voltage and current precisely.

As illustrated, when electricity is drawn from a lead‑acid battery, sulfuric acid reacts with the lead of the negative plates (top reac­tion). This reaction yields electrons, tiny negatively charged particles. They flow out of the battery creating an electrical cur­rent. During this reaction, lead on the surface of the negative plates is converted to tiny lead sulfate crystals. Proper array sizing within a complete solar PV system helps maintain discharge rates that minimize sulfation and extend service life.

Fig. 2: Chemical Reactions in a Lead‑Acid Battery.

When a battery is discharging, sulfuric acid also reacts with the lead dioxide of the positive plates, resulting in the formation of lead sulfate crystals on them as well (see bottom panel). Discharging a battery not only creates lead sulfate crystals on the positive and neg­ative plates, it depletes the amount of sulfuric acid in the battery. When the battery is charged, however, lead sulfate crystals on the positive and negative plates are broken down, releasing sulfate ions into solution, thus replenishing the sulfuric acid. (The reactions that take place during recharge are the reverse of those that occur during discharge.)

Although the chemistry of lead‑acid batteries is a bit compli­cated, it is important to remember that this system works because electrons can be stored in the chemicals within the battery when a battery is charged. The stored electrons can be drawn out by revers­ing the chemical reactions. Through this reversible chemical reaction, the battery is acting as a"charge pump:' moving electrical charges through a circuit on demand. This stored energy can then be delivered through portable or stationary solar power generators to meet variable household or field demands.

Related Articles

• Solar Power Channel

Solar power pros and cons examine renewable energy benefits, photovoltaic efficiency, installation costs, battery storage, net metering, grid-tied reliability, maintenance, incentives, and carbon footprint to assess ROI, payback period, and long-term sustainability.

What Are the Solar Power Pros and Cons?

Solar power offers low OPEX and emissions, but faces intermittency, upfront CAPEX, and location constraints.

✅ Pros: low OPEX, incentives, reduced carbon footprint.

✅ Cons: intermittency, high CAPEX, storage or grid upgrades.

✅ Evaluate: irradiance, roof orientation, shading, net metering policy.

Solar Power Pros and Cons

Solar energy is a seemingly ideal fuel source. It's clean. It's free. It's abundant, and its use could ease many of the world's most pressing environmental problems, chief among them global climate change. Because solar energy has its share of critics, its worth taking a look at both the pros and cons of solar energy and responding to the criticisms. For a concise review of key benefits and typical tradeoffs, see advantages of solar power for additional perspective.

Availability and Variability

Although the Sun shines 24 hours a day and beams down on the Earth at all times, half the planet is always immersed in darkness. This poses a problem, because modern societies consume electric­ity 24 hours a day, 365 days a year.

Another problem is the daily variability of solar energy. That is, even during daylight hours clouds can block the Sun, sometimes for days on end. If PV systems are unable to generate electricity 24 hours a day like coal‑fired and nuclear power plants, how can we use them to power our 24‑hour‑per‑day demand for electricity? Understanding how a solar PV system is designed to manage intermittency clarifies the need for storage and flexible loads.

Homeowners like myself who live off‑grid (not connected to the electrical grid) solve the problem by installing batteries to store electricity to meet their nighttime demand and to supply electric­ity for use on cloudy days. As a result, they are supplied with electricity 24 hours a day, 365 days a year by PV systems. Practical layouts and component choices are detailed in off-grid solar power systems guides for homeowners.

In all such setups, DC output from modules is converted by solar power inverters into AC so common appliances operate reliably.

The Sun's variable nature can also be offset by coupling solar electric systems with other renewable energy sources, for example, wind‑electric systems, or micro hydro systems. Wind systems, for instance, generate electricity day and night ‑ so long as the winds blow. Micro hydro systems tap the energy of flowing water in streams or rivers. Either one can be used to generate electricity to supplement a PV system, compensating for the Sun's natural vari­ability. Solar and wind are especially good partners. Figure 1 shows data on the solar and wind resources at my renewable energy education center in eastern Missouri. As illustrated, the Sun shines a lot in the spring, summer, and early fall but less so during the win­ter. During winter, however, the winds blow more often and much more forcefully. A wind turbine could easily make up for the reduced output of a PV system, ensuring a reliable, year‑round sup­ply of electricity at this and other similar sites. Such hybrid configurations are explored in renewable energy systems references that focus on complementary resources.

While the Sun's variability can easily be overcome on the indi­vidual level, can society find a way to meet its 24‑hour‑per‑day needs for electrical energy from the Sun Scientists and engineers are currently developing numerous ingenious technologies to store solar electricity. Batteries are not high on the list, however. Why?

To store massive amounts of electricity to power factories, stores, and homes, we'd need equally massive battery banks. Because they would be costly and would require huge investments, scien­tists are seeking a variety of other, potentially more cost‑effective options. One option is the solar thermal electric system mentioned earlier, which stores surplus solar‑heated water to run electric gen­erators at night or during cloudy periods.

Another option is the use of solar electricity to power air com­pressors. They'd produce compressed air that could be stored in abandoned underground mines. When electricity is needed, the compressed air would be released through a turbine, not unlike those found in conventional power plants. The blades of the turbine would be attached to a shaft that is attached to a generator that produces electricity.

Surplus solar electricity could also be used to generate hydro­gen gas from water. Hydrogen gas is created when electricity is run through water. This process, known as electrolysis, splits the water into its components, hydrogen and oxygen, both gases. Hydrogen can be stored in tanks and later burned to produce hot air or to heat water to produce steam. Hot air and steam can be used to spin a turbine attached to a generator. Hydrogen could also be fed into a fuel cell, which produces electricity.

As in residential systems, electricity can also be supplied on cloudy days or at night by commercial wind farms. They could provide power to supplement solar systems because the winds often blow when the Sun is behind clouds (during storms, for instance). Other renewable energy technologies can also be used to complement solar energy. Hydroelectric plants and biomass facili­ties, for instance, could be used to ensure a continuous supply of renewable energy in a system that's finely tuned to switch from one energy source to another. In Canada, hydroelectric facilities can be turned on and off as needed to meet demand. Such systems could be used to produce electricity when demand exceeds the capacity of commercial solar systems or at night.

Shortfalls could also be offset on a local or regional level by transferring electricity from areas of surplus solar and/or wind pro­duction to areas of insufficient electrical production. Surplus solar‑generated electricity from Colorado, for example, could be shipped via the electrical grid to neighboring Wyoming, New Mexico, and Nebraska when needed ‑ or vice versa.

Solar's variability can also be offset by natural gas‑fired power plants and newer coal‑fired plants that burn pulverized coal. Both can be started or stopped, or throttled up or down, to provide addi­tional electricity. These facilities could serve as an excellent backup source as we transition to a renewable energy future.

With smart planning and careful design, we can meet a good portion of our electrical needs from this seemingly capricious resource. For broader context on its role within the energy transition, explore alternative energy solar power discussions that link technology, policy, and markets.

Aesthetics

While many of us view a solar electric array as a thing of great value, our neighbors don't always share our opinions. Some neighborhood associations have banned PV systems.

Ironically, those who object to solar electric systems rarely com­plain about the visual blight in our environs, among them cell phone towers, water towers, electric transmission lines, and bill­boards. One reason that these common eyesores draw little attention is that they have resided in our communities for decades. We've grown used to ubiquitous electric lines and radio towers.

Fortunately there are ways to mount a solar array so that it blends seamlessly with a roof.   Solar modules can be flush mounted on roofs. There's also a solar product that can be applied directly to a certain type of metal roof, creating an even lower‑profile array. Solar arrays can also be mounted on a pole or rack anchored to the ground that can be placed in sunny backyards ‑ out of a neighbor's line of sight.

Cost

Perhaps the biggest disadvantage of solar electric systems is thatthey're costly ‑ very costly. Although the cost of solar cells has fallen precipitously, from around $50 per watt in the mid 1970s to $5 per watt in the early 2000s then to about $3.50 a watt in 2009, solar electric systems are one of the most expensive means of gen­erating electricity ‑ but only if you ignore the environmental costs of conventional power and the generous subsidies these technolo­gies receive from taxpayers. Comparative analyses of levelized costs are outlined in solar power economics to quantify these tradeoffs.

Although solar electric systems are expensive, there are ways to lower the cost ‑ often substantially. And there are factors that make, a system competitive with conventional electricity. If, for instance, you live in an area with lots of sunshine and high electrical rates, such as southern California or Hawaii, a PV system com­petes very well with conventional electricity. Even in areas with low sunshine but high electrical rates, such as Germany, PV is economi­cally competitive. Financial incentives for PV systems from local utilities or the state and federal government drive costs down, often making solar electricity cost competitive with conventional sources.

If you are building a home more than a few tenths of a mile from a power line, solar electricity can also compete with utility power. That's because utility companies often charge customers a I arge fee to connect to the utility grid. You could, for instance, pay $20,000 to connect to the electric line, even if you're only a few tenths of mile away from a power line. Line extension fees don't pay for a single kilowatt‑hour of electricity; they only cover the cost of the transformer, poles, wires, electrical meter, and installation. You'll pay the cost of the connection either up front or pro‑rated over many years.

Related Articles

• Solar Power Channel

Solar power economics evaluates ROI, LCOE, CAPEX, OPEX, payback periods, tax credits, net metering, financing, and grid parity to quantify solar project viability, cash flows, and lifecycle costs under tariffs and incentives.

What Is Solar Power Economics?

Quantifies solar project costs and revenues via ROI, LCOE, payback, and incentives to evaluate financial feasibility.

✅ Model LCOE, CAPEX, OPEX, and degradation rates

✅ Forecast cash flows, payback period, and IRR

✅ Account for incentives, net metering, and tax credits

Does a Solar Electric System Make Economic Sense?

At least three options are available to analyze the economic costs and benefits of a solar electric system: (1) a comparison of the cost of electricity from the solar electric system with conventional power or some other renewable energy technology, (2) an estimate of return on investment, and (3) a more sophisticated economic analy­sis tool known as total cost of ownership.

Cost of Electricity Comparison

One of the simplest ways of analyzing the economic performance of a solar system is to compare the cost of electricity produced by a PV system to the cost of electricity from a conventional source such as the local utility. This is a five‑step process, two of which I've already discussed. For readers new to PV components, this overview of solar PV systems explains how modules, inverters, and meters work together in practice.

The first step is to determine the average monthly electrical con­sumption of your home or business, preferably after incorporating conservation and efficiency measures. Second, calculate the size of the system you'll need to install to meet your needs. Third, calcu­late the cost of the system. (A solar provider can help you with this.) Fourth, after determining the cost of the system, calculate the out­put of the system over a 30‑year period, the expected life of the system. Fifth, now estimate the cost per kilowatt‑hour by dividing the cost of a PV system by the total output. To frame those calculations within a broader decision context, consider the practical advantages of solar power that complement purely numerical comparisons.

Suppose you live in Colorado and are interested in installing a grid‑connected solar electric system that will meet 100% of your electric needs. Your super‑efficient home requires, on average, 500 kWh of electricity per month. That's 16.4 kWh per day. Peak sun hours is 6. To size the system, divide the electrical demand (16.4 kWh per day) by the peak sun hours. The result is a 2.7 kW sys­tem. Adjusting for 78% efficiency, the system should be 3.46 or 3.5 kW. For the sake of simplicity, let's assume that the system is not shaded at all during the year. Site specifics and design choices inevitably involve tradeoffs, and a concise review of solar power pros and cons can clarify expectations before you commit.

Your local solar installer says she can install the system for $7 a watt, or $24,500. You'll receive a rebate from the utility of $3.50 per watt of installed capacity or $12,250. The system cost is now $12,250. You'll also receive a 30% tax credit from the federal gov­ernment on the cost of the system. The federal tax credit is based on the initial cost of the system ($24,500) minus the utility rebate ($12,250 in this example). Thirty percent of this amount equals $3,675. Total system cost after subtracting these incentives is $8,575.

According to your calculations or the calculations provided by the solar installer, this system will produce about 16.4 kWh of elec­tricity per day or 6,000 kWh per year. If the system lasts for 30 years, it will produce 180,000 kWh.

To calculate the cost per kilowatt‑hour, divide the system cost ($8,575) by the output (180,000 kWh). In this case, your electric­ity will cost slightly less than 4.76 cents per kWh. Considering that the going rate in Colorado is currently about 9.5 cents per kWh, including all fees and taxes, the PV system represents a pretty good investment.

Return on Investment

 Another relatively simple method used to determine the cost effec­tiveness of a PV system is simple return on investment (ROT). Simple return on investment is, as its name implies, the savings gen­erated by installing a PV system expressed as a percentage of the investment. When comparing projects across technologies, resources on renewable energy systems can help you understand how ROT varies by technology and market.

Simple ROT is calculated by dividing the annual dollar value of the energy generated by a PV or wind system by the cost of the sys­tem. A solar electric system that produces 6,000 kWh of electricity per year in an area where electricity sells at 9.5 cents per kilowatt‑hour generates $570 worth of electricity each year. If the system costs $8,575, after rebates, the simple return on investment is $570 divided by $10,710 x 100 which equals 6.6%. If the utility charges 15 cents per kWh, the 6,000 kWh of electricity would be worth $900 and the simple ROT would be 10.5%. Given the state of the economy, both of these represent decent rates of return. (If only our retirement funds performed half as well these days!) Even in good economic times, these are respectable ROTs.
 

Weaknesses of Economic Analysis Tools

Comparing the cost of electricity and return on investment are both simple tools. Both fail to take into account a number of economic factors. For example, both techniques fail to account for interest payments on loans that may be required to purchase a PV system. Interest payments will add to the cost of electricity produced by the system. For those who self‑finance, for example, by taking money out of savings, both tools fail to take into account opportunity costs ‑ lost income from interest‑bearing accounts raided to pay for the system.

Both methods fail to take into account the rising cost of elec­tricity. Nationwide, electric rates have increased on average about 4.4% per year over the past 35 years. In recent years, the rate of increase has been double that amount in some areas.

Although these analytic tools fail to account for key economic factors that would decrease the value of a PV system, the rising cost of electricity from conventional sources will in all likelihood offset the opportunity cost or the cost of financing a system. For a quick primer that situates PV within the broader clean energy landscape, see this guide to alternative energy solar power for additional context.

That said, these techniques do not take into account system maintenance, insurance, or property taxes, if any. All of these factors add to the cost of a system over the long term.

Despite these shortcomings, the cost comparison and simple return on investment are convenient tools for evaluating the economic performance of renewable energy systems. They're infinitely better than the old standby, payback (also known as "simple payback").

Why ?

Payback is a term that gained popularity in the 1970s. It was used to determine whether energy conservation measures and renewable energy systems made economic sense. Payback is the number of years it takes a renewable energy system or energy effi­ciency measure to pay back its cost through the savings it generates.

Payback is calculated by dividing the cost of a system by the anticipated annual savings. If the $8,575 PV system I've been look­ing at produces 6,000 kilowatt‑hours per year and grid power costs you 9.5 cents per kWh, the annual savings of $570 yields a payback of 18.8 years ($8,575 divided by $570 = 15 years). In other words, this system will take 15 years to pay for itself. From that point on, the system produces electricity free of charge.

While the payback of 15 years on this system seems long, don't forget that the return on investment on this system, calculated ear­lier, was 6.6%, which is a very respectable rate of return on your investment ‑ or any investment these days.

While simple payback is fairly easy to understand, it has some very serious drawbacks. The most important is that payback is a foreign concept to most of us and, as a result, can be a bit misleading.

Besides being misleading, simple payback is a concept we rarely apply in our lives. Do avid anglers ever calculate the payback on their new bass boats ($25,000 plus the cost of oil, gas, and trans­portation to and from favorite fishing spots divided by the total number of pounds of edible bass meat at $5 per pound over the lifetime of the boat.) Do couples ever calculate the payback on their new SUV or the new chandelier they installed in the dining room ?

Simple payback and simple return on investment are closely related metrics. In fact, ROl is the reciprocal of payback. That is, ROl = 1/Payback. Thus, a PV system with a 10‑year payback rep­resents a 10% return on investment (ROT = 1/10). A PV system with a 20‑year payback represents a 5% ROT.

Although payback and ROT are related, return on investment is a much more familiar concept. We receive interest on savings accounts and are paid a percentage on mutual funds and bonds ‑ both of which are a return on our investment. Most of us were introduced to return on investment very early in life ‑ when we opened our first interest‑bearing account. Renewable energy sys­tems also yield a return on our investment, so it is logical to use ROT to assess their economic performance.
 

Adjusting for Incentives

When calculating the cost of electricity from a solar electric sys­tem, be sure to remember to subtract financial incentives from state and local government or local utilities ‑ as in the previous exam­ple. Financial incentives can be quite substantial. In Wisconsin, for example, more than 30 utilities participate in a statewide program called Focus on Energy through which they provide customers who install PV systems a rebate of up to 25% of their system cost with a maximum reward of $35,000. Other utilities and even several states, like New York, offer generous incentives as well. The best PV incentives are found in Colorado, New Jersey, Massachusetts, California, and Oregon.

The federal government also offers a generous financial incen­tive to those who install PV systems. Their incentive is a 30% tax credit to homeowners and businesses. However, the feds also allow businesses to depreciate a solar electric system on an accelerated schedule, which means they can deduct the costs faster than other business equipment, recouping their investment more quickly. This further reduces the cost of a PV system. The US Department of Agriculture offers a 25% grant to cover the cost of PV systems on farms and rural businesses. Their minimum grant is $2,500 (for a $10,000 system) and the maximum is $500,000. To learn more about state and federal incentives in your area, log on to the Database of State Incentives for Renewables and Efficiency at www.dsireusa.org. Click on the map of your state. To learn more about USDA grant program, log on to www.rurdev.usda.gov/. Up-to-date guidance on eligibility and claiming benefits is available in this overview of alternative energy tax credits for homeowners and businesses.

Because financial incentives can reduce the cost of a PV system, most PV system installations are driven by incentives.

Discounting and Net Present Value: Total Cost of Ownership

For those who want a more sophisticated tool to determine whether an investment in solar energy makes sense, economists offer up dis­counting and net present value. This method, referred to as total cost of ownership, allows you to compare the cost of a PV system to the cost of the electricity it will displace. Unlike the previous economic tools, this one takes into account numerous economic parameters, including initial costs, financial incentives, maintenance costs, the rising cost of grid power, and another key element, the time value of money. The time value of money takes into account the fact that a dollar today is worth more than a dollar tomorrow and even more than a dollar a few years from now. Economists refer to this as the discount factor.

To make life easier, this economic analysis can be performed by using a spread sheet. This method is discussed in Powerfrom the Sun.

Alternative Financing for PV Systems

Not everyone has access to the money required to purchase a PV system ‑ even with incentives ‑ or wants to incur that kind of debt. If you are one of these people, there are some alternative financing mechanisms that could still make your dreams of a PV system come true: power purchase agreements (PPAs) and leases.

In a power purchase agreement, a private company installs a solar electric system on a customer's home mostly at their expense. (They do require a down payment to help offset the cost of the sys­tem and installation.) The company owns and"operates" the system, selling the electricity generated by the system to the homeowner at a low rate ‑ usually a rate that increases much more slowly than utility rates for the duration of the lease, typically around 18 years. Homeowners benefit because they incur no upfront costs while enjoying lower electric bills and living a more environmentally friendly lifestyle. They also own a residence that will probably sell more quickly when the time comes to put it on the market.

Another option is a lease. Once again, the PV system is installed by a private company and the system is leased to them. Customers that lease PV systems typically end up paying slightly less for elec­tricity. The lease also guarantees a fixed rate for the term of the agreement, providing a hedge against rising electric rates.

Lease programs are available in California, Arizona, Oregon, Colorado and Connecticut. Expect to see other companies enter the market in other states.

Lease programs and power purchase agreements are really quite similar. The main difference is that in lease programs there's typi­cally no down payment. However, as author and market analyst Charles W. Thurston explains in an article in Home Power maga­zine (issue 128), "if you can afford to invest up front in part of the system cost (through a PPA), you'll pay less as time goes on, and your savings can be greater at the end of the contract. In that case, a PPA may be more beneficial.'

Despite Thurston's analysis, representatives from both indus­tries argue that the financial costs are not that different over the long haul. "The bottom line is that a solar lease or PPA makes it possible for any homeowner to stop talking about tomorrow and act now," says Thurston. If you'd like to power your home with solar electricity, but can't afford a system or don't want to borrow the money, consider a lease or a power purchase agreement.
 

Putting It All Together

Here, you've seen that there are several ways to save money on a PV system. Efficiency measures lower the initial size and cost of a system, saving huge sums of money. Tax incentives and rebates also lower the cost. Some states exempt PV systems from sales taxes or property taxes, creating additional savings. I encourage those who are building superefficient passive solar/solar electric homes to view savings they'll accrue from efficiency measures and passive solar design as a kind of internal subsidy or rebate for their PV systems. My own solar electric system cost about $17,000 and has generated about $4,000 worth of electricity in the first 12 years. The return on investment is pretty low. However, my passive solar home has saved me approximately $18,000 in heating bills during this same period. Savings on electricity from the PV and savings on heating bills resulting from passive solar heating have more than paid for my PV system. If your site lacks reliable utility service, the cost-benefit picture can shift, and planning for off-grid solar power systems involves different assumptions about storage, backup, and maintenance.

Economics is where the rubber meets the road. Comparing solar electric systems against the "competition" and calculating the return on investment gives a potential buyer a much more realistic view of the feasibility of solar energy at a particular site. Remember, however, economics is not the only metric on which we base our decisions. Energy independence, environmental values, reliability, the cool factor, bragging rights, the fun value, and other factors all play prominently in our decisions to invest in renewable energy.

Related Articles

• Solar Power Channel

Off grid solar power systems integrate PV arrays, MPPT charge controllers, battery storage, and inverters to deliver AC/DC power, engineered for load profiles, autonomy, grounding, and protection without utility interconnection.

What are off grid solar power systems?

Standalone PV with batteries, MPPT charge controllers, and inverters supplying AC/DC loads without utility connection.

✅ Load sizing: kWh/day, peak demand, autonomy, DoD, inverter surge

✅ Core components: PV array, MPPT, batteries, inverter/charger

✅ Electrical design: wiring, grounding, OCPD, earthing, voltage

Off‑grid systems are designed for individuals and businesses that want to or must supply all of their needs via solar energy ‑ or a combination of solar and wind or some other renewable source. As shown in Figure 1a, off‑grid systems bear a remarkable resem­blance to grid‑connected systems with battery backup. There are some noteworthy differences, however. The most notable is the lack of grid connection.

Broader design principles from renewable energy systems help frame choices around storage, redundancy, and load management.

As illustrated in Figure 1, electricity flows from the PV array to the charge controller. The charge controller, monitors battery voltage and delivers DC electricity to the battery bank. When elec­tricity is needed in a home or business, it is drawn from the battery bank via the inverter. The inverter converts the DC electricity from the battery bank, typically 24 or 48 volts in a standard system, to higher‑voltage AC, either 120 or 240 volts, which is required by households and businesses. AC electricity then flows to active cir­cuits in the house via the main service panel. For a refresher on each building block, see this overview of a solar PV system and how components interact under varying loads.

Off‑grid systems often require a little "assistance' to make up for shortfalls. Additional electricity can be supplied by a wind tur­bine, micro hydro turbine, or a gasoline or diesel generator, often referred to as a gen‑set. "A gen‑set also provides redundancy' notes National Renewable Energy Laboratory's wind energy expert Jim Green. Moreover, "if a critical component of a hybrid system goes down temporarily, the gen‑set can fill in while repairs are made:' Gen‑sets also play a key role in maintaining batteries. Guidelines for sizing and operating solar power generators can clarify fuel use, runtime targets, and maintenance intervals.

Fig 1. Off -grid System.

Off‑grid systems with gen‑sets require another component, a battery charger. They convert the AC electricity produced by the generator into DC electricity that's then fed into the battery bank. Battery chargers are built into the inverter and operate automati­cally. When a generator is started and the inverter senses voltage at its input terminals, it then transfers the home loads over to the gen­erator through an internal, automatic transfer switch. It also begins charging the battery from the generator. When selecting equipment, detailed comparisons of solar power inverters can inform waveform quality, surge capacity, and charger integration.

Like grid‑connected systems with battery backup, an off‑grid system requires safety disconnects ‑ to permit safe servicing. DC disconnects, with appropriately rated fuses or breakers, are located between the PV array and the charge controller, between the charge controller and the battery bank, and between the battery and the inverter.

These systems also require charge controllers to regulate battery charging from the PV array. Charge controllers also protect the batteries from overcharging.

As is evident by comparing schematics of the three types of sys­tems, off‑grid PV systems are the most complex. Moreover, some systems are partially wired for DC ‑ that is, they contain DC cir­cuits. These are supplied directly from the battery bank. DC circuits are used to service lights or DC appliances such as refrig­erators or DC well or cistern pumps. Why include DC circuits ?

Many people who install them do so because DC circuits bypass the inverter. Because inverters are not 100% efficient in their conversion of DC to AC, this saves energy. Operating a DC refrig­erator, for example, over long periods can save a substantial amount of energy.

The problem with this strategy is that DC circuits are low volt­age circuits and thus require much larger wiring and special, more expensive plugs and sockets. DC appliances are also harder to find. In addition, they are typically much smaller than those used in homes, and they are less reliable.

If you are thinking about installing an off‑grid system in a home or business, your best bet is an AC system ‑ unless your home is extremely small and your needs are few.

To simplify installation of battery‑based systems, many installers recommend use of a power center, such as the one shown in Figure 2. Power centers contain many of the essential components of a renewable energy system, including the inverter, the charge con­troller, and fused safety disconnects ‑ all prewired. This makes an electrician's job easier. Power centers also provide busses (con­nection points) to which the wires leading to the battery bank, the inverter, and the PV array connect.

Pros and Cons of Off‑Grid Systems

Off‑grid systems offer many benefits, including total emancipation from the electric utility (Table 1). They provide a high degree of energy independence that many people long for. You become your own utility, responsible for all of your energy production. In addi­tion, if designed and operated correctly, your system will provide energy day in and day out for many years. Off‑grid systems also provide freedom from occasional power failures. These benefits align with widely cited advantages of solar power such as resilience, predictable costs, and modular growth options.

Off‑grid systems do have some downsides. One of the most significant is that they are the most expensive of the three renewable energy system options. Battery banks, sup­plemental wind systems, and generators add substantially to the cost ‑ often 60% more. They also require more wiring. In addition, you will need space to house battery banks and generators. Although cost is usually a major downside, there are times when off‑grid sys­tems cost the same or less than grid‑connected systems ‑ for example, if a home or business is located more than a few tenths of a mile from the electric grid. Under such circumstances, it can cost more to run electric lines to a home than to install an off‑grid system. For planning and budgeting, practical primers on solar power economics explain lifecycle costs, incentives, and payback scenarios.

When installing an off‑grid system, remember that you become the local power company and your independence comes at a cost to you. Also, although you may be independent" from the utility, you will need to buy a gen‑set and fuel, both from large corporations. Gen‑sets cost money to maintain and operate. You will be dependent on your own ability to repair your power system when something fails. If you are weighing tradeoffs, a balanced look at the solar power pros and cons can sharpen expectations about reliability, maintenance, and total ownership.

An off‑grid system also comes at a cost to the environment. Gen‑sets produce air and noise pollution. Lead‑acid batteries are far from environmentally benign. Although virtually all lead‑acid batteries are recycled, battery production is responsible for considerable envi­ronmental degradation. Mining and refining the lead are fairly damaging. Thanks to NAFTA and the global economy, lead pro­duction and battery recycling are being carried out in many poor countries that have lax or nonexistent environmental policies. They are responsible for some of the most egregious pollution and health problems facing poorer nations across the globe, according to small wind energy expert Mick Sagrillo. So, think carefully before you decide to install an off‑grid system.

Related Articles

• Solar Power Channel