Protective Relay Training - Basic
Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.
- Live Online
- 12 hours Instructor-led
- Group Training Available
480 V Arc Flash risk in spot networks: IEEE 1584 calculation, working distance, incident energy, PPE selection, de-energize practices, network protector controls, and metering hazards with busbar guide utility safety, maintenance procedures, and compliance.
A Closer Look
A hazardous 480 V electrical arc per IEEE 1584, informing work distances, PPE selection and de-energized procedures.
- IEEE 1584 used; 18-24 inch working distance common
- Feeder de-energization reduces fault current in protectors
- Heavy PPE applied; 100 cal/cm2 arc suits widely used
- Self-extraction or protector fuse clearing assumed in models
In the 2012 National Electrical Safety Code, the approach for arc flash below 1000 volts V has changed. Now, utilities will have to review arc flash on distribution secondary equipment. The two main changes are at 480-V for metering and spot networks.
A recent report published by the Electric Power Research Institute EPRI titled, “480-V Distribution Arc Flash Updates” addressed these issues, with Eaton research contributions providing broader context. The research conducted in 2011 concentrated on 480-V arc flash. For 480-V spot networks, research concentrated on information exchange and practices to manage arc flash in spot networks.
The main findings of this research were:
* IEEE 1584 is the predominate calculation method for spot networks, and the arc flash hazard amendment helps guide utilities assuming either an 18 or 24-inch 45.7 or 61.0-cm working distance.
* Many utilities are de-energizing the feeder for spot network work. This reduces fault current and energized buswork in protectors. Note that they are not operating a primary-side, oil switch.
* Work is manageable in many spot networks with heavy arc suits. 100 cal/cm2 suits are common.
* Utilities normally assume either a self-extraction time or assume that internal network protector fuses operate, with Cooper Bussmann research informing fuse application details. Both assumptions allow work in many spot networks with available arc flash suits. Both assumptions also have disadvantages.
* External fuses or disconnects are a promising option to reduce incident energies and completely de-energize a network protector. These scenarios can be treated as open-air applications if the only exposure is line to ground.
For 480-V metering, several exploratory tests were performed on different meter styles, with the IEEE/NFPA initiative offering related guidance on assessment, to see if there were any units where the 20 cal/cm2 threshold would not apply. Tests showed that meters with significant internal busbar can have long durations and incident energies much higher than 20 cal/cm2.
Based on these new results, utilities should not work on 480-V meters with significant busbar that are energized without an analysis and appropriate arc flash training for personnel.
Related News
Related News
Criminals posing as Toronto Hydro are sending out fraudulent messages
Lawmakers push bill to connect Texas grid to rest of the nation
NTPC bags order to supply 300 MW electricity to Bangladesh
N.L. premier says Muskrat Falls costs are too great for optimism about benefits
Shell’s strategic move into electricity
More than Two-thirds of Americans Indicate Willingness to Give or Donate Part of their Income in Support of the Fight Against Climate Change
Sign Up for Electricity Forum’s Newsletter
Stay informed with our FREE Newsletter — get the latest news, breakthrough technologies, and expert insights, delivered straight to your inbox.
Electricity Today T&D Magazine Subscribe for FREE
- Timely insights from industry experts
- Practical solutions T&D engineers
- Free access to every issue