FERC documents in California trading case to be secret


NFPA 70E Training

Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.

  • Live Online
  • 6 hours Instructor-led
  • Group Training Available
Regular Price:
$199
Coupon Price:
$149
Reserve Your Seat Today
An administrative law judge said recently she would keep secret the responses of some 43 companies to a Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) order to justify profits gained from Enron-style trading tactics during the California energy crisis.

The documents will be temporarily kept private under an agency order issued on Friday to "try to encourage settlement negotiations," FERC Judge Carmen Cintron told Reuters in a telephone interview.

So far, more than a half-dozen companies or municipalities have reached tentative deals with FERC trial staff to settle allegations that they used manipulative trading tactics to boost their profits in 2000-01.

The settlements involve relatively small amounts of money, ranging from $17,000 to $857,000, compared to demands from California officials for billions in refunds from unfair trading strategies.

In June, FERC commissioners ordered 43 firms that may have used Enron-style strategies to "show cause" why they should not have to repay the profits gained from the use of these strategies. The agency did not quantify the amount of money at stake.

Judge Cintron said she will will hold a hearing on Wednesday to determine when the secret responses will be made public.

Morgan Stanley (MWD) agreed to pay $857,089 in one of the biggest tentative settlements to emerge from closed-door talks hosted by FERC. All settlements must be approved by FERC's three commissioners before they can be finalized.

Other firms that have reached tentative settlements with FERC trial staff are Reliant Resources Inc., Aquila Inc., American Electric Power Co. Inc. and Mirant Corp.

FERC staff has recommended that similar cases brought against the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power and Bonneville Power Administration be dropped.

Cases that are not settled by Nov. 3 will proceed to formal hearings before a FERC administrative law judge.

The cases are pending in docket EL03-137.

Related News

Site C mega dam billions over budget but will go ahead: B.C. premier

Site C Dam Update outlines hydroelectric budget overruns, geotechnical risks, COVID-19 construction delays, BC Hydro…
View more

Europe's Worst Energy Nightmare Is Becoming Reality

European Energy Crisis shocks markets as Russia slashes gas via Nord Stream, spiking prices and…
View more

Coal demand dropped in Europe over winter despite energy crisis

EU Winter Energy Mix 2022-2023 shows renewables, wind, solar, and hydro overtaking coal and gas,…
View more

Tornadoes and More: What Spring Can Bring to the Power Grid

Spring Storm Grid Risks highlight tornado outbreaks, flooding, power outages, and transmission disruptions, with NOAA…
View more

Alberta gives $40M to help workers transition from coal power jobs

Alberta Coal Transition Support offers EI top-ups, 75% wage replacement, retraining, tuition vouchers, and on-site…
View more

U.S. Grid overseer issues warning on Coronavirus

NERC COVID-19 Grid Security Alert urges utilities to update business continuity plans, assess supply chain…
View more

Sign Up for Electricity Forum’s Newsletter

Stay informed with our FREE Newsletter — get the latest news, breakthrough technologies, and expert insights, delivered straight to your inbox.

Electricity Today T&D Magazine Subscribe for FREE

Stay informed with the latest T&D policies and technologies.
  • Timely insights from industry experts
  • Practical solutions T&D engineers
  • Free access to every issue

Download the 2026 Electrical Training Catalog

Explore 50+ live, expert-led electrical training courses –

  • Interactive
  • Flexible
  • CEU-cerified