New coal ash rules could affect Gibson


NFPA 70E Training

Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.

  • Live Online
  • 6 hours Instructor-led
  • Group Training Available
Regular Price:
$199
Coupon Price:
$149
Reserve Your Seat Today

Coal ash regulation weighs EPA hazardous waste rules, citizen enforcement, lined ponds, groundwater protection, and public health. Environmental groups seek stricter oversight; utilities warn of rising costs, reliability risks, and impacts on electricity consumers.

 

The Latest Developments

Coal ash regulation defines EPA rules on hazardous status, storage standards, and enforcement to reduce toxic pollution.

  • EPA weighs hazardous vs nonhazardous classification
  • Special waste status enables federal enforcement power
  • Industry backs liners, state oversight, citizen suits
  • Reports link ash sites to arsenic, boron, selenium pollution

 

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is looking into imposing strict new federal regulations on the handling of coal ash, a move that could carry consequences for the Gibson Generating Station in Princeton, Ind.

 

The agency began a month-long series of public hearings on the handling of coal ash — the material that remains after coal is burned to create electricity — after a wake-up call from a major ash flood, and could determine by the end of the year whether it should be treated as a hazardous waste.

Environmental groups, led by the Environmental Integrity Project, are advocating for strict new protections. Electric utilities, meanwhile, essentially agree that additional regulation is necessary but hope the EPA doesn't define coal ash as hazardous waste, a determination that could increase operating costs.

Two proposals are under consideration.

The one supported by environmental groups would designate coal ash as a special waste, which would place it in the category of a hazardous substance.

The proposal supported by industry groups would regulate the residue as a nonhazardous material that could be stored only in ponds with special liners, citing claims that some 'dirtiest' lists rely on outdated data from earlier years. The federal government would have no real regulatory power, and enforcement would be handled through citizen lawsuits.

"Nonhazardous waste regulation will ensure that coal ash is managed safely, while also protecting human health and the environment, jobs and electricity consumers,'' the Utility Solid Waste Activities Group, an industry organization, said in a statement.

"EPA's other option — to regulate coal ash as a hazardous waste — would impose staggering costs on power plant operations, causing electricity costs to increase and threatening electric reliability."

Lyndsay Moseley, federal policy representative of the Sierra Club, an environmental organization, said the federal government can no longer afford to ignore the issue.

"The only real solution is for the EPA to adopt federally enforceable protections as part of its push to improve public health,'' she said. "We're talking about people's lives here."

The coal ash issue was raised recently in a pair of reports from the Environmental Integrity Project and Earthjustice that identified 70 higher-risk sites, including the Gibson plant, that are contaminating nearby water sources with high levels of arsenic, boron and selenium, based on state-provided data.

Coal ash pollution poses a serious health risk, with some research finding it is more radioactive than nuclear waste in certain contexts. People living near unlined coal ash ponds have a one-in-50 risk of cancer — more than 2,000 times higher than the federal EPA considers acceptable.

Toxins found in coal ash have been linked to organ disease, respiratory illness, neurological damages and developmental problems, according to Earthjustice.

According to the Environmental Integrity Project, the coal ash produced by the Gibson Generating Station is sluiced into on-site impoundments that are not lined.

The initial Environmental Integrity Project report issued in February, "Out of Control: Mounting Damages from Coal Ash Waste Sites,'' said an analysis of state pollution data shows coal fly ash and bottom ash are contaminating off-site surface and groundwater and affecting aquatic life near the Gibson plant.

Boron contamination has reached the nearby community of East Mount Carmel and selenium, discharged from the cooling lake that receives water from the plant's ash ponds, has contaminated fish and aquatic invertebrates in the Cane Ridge Wildlife Management Area.

Selenium in Gibson Lake fish has risen to levels resulting in a fishing ban, according to the report.

Exposure to large amounts of boron over short periods, according to the report, can eventually lead to death. Arsenic discovered at the site is a known carcinogen.

The Gibson plant, operated by Duke Energy of Charlotte, N.C., is one of the nation's largest, producing about 2 million tons of ash and scrubber waste every year.

Duke is undertaking a project to keep the fly ash dry, using maximum controls so it can be disposed of in a 377-acre state-of-the-art landfill with a synthetic lining over an additional layer of clay and sand to capture any liquid waste that might seep out.

The transition will be complete by 2013.

Duke supplies and delivers electricity to about 4 million U.S. customers. The company has about 35,000 net megawatts of electric generating capacity in the Midwest and the Carolinas.

 

Related News

Related News

More young Canadians would work in electricity… if they knew about it

Generation Impact Report reveals how Canada's electricity sector can recruit Millennials and Gen Z, highlighting…
View more

Opp Leader calls for electricity market overhaul to favor consumers over generators

Labor National Electricity Market Reform aims to rebalance NEM rules, support a fair-dinkum clean energy…
View more

Berlin Launches Electric Flying Ferry

Berlin Flying Electric Ferry drives sustainable urban mobility with zero-emission water transit, advanced electric propulsion,…
View more

The Power Sector’s Most Crucial COVID-19 Mitigation Strategies

ESCC COVID-19 Resource Guide outlines control center continuity, sequestration, social distancing, remote operations, testing priorities,…
View more

BC Hydro rates going up 3 per cent

BC Hydro Rate Freeze Rejection details the BCUC decision enabling a 3% rate increase, citing…
View more

Solar power growth, jobs decline during pandemic

COVID-19 Solar Job Losses are erasing five years of workforce growth, SEIA reports, with U.S.…
View more

Sign Up for Electricity Forum’s Newsletter

Stay informed with our FREE Newsletter — get the latest news, breakthrough technologies, and expert insights, delivered straight to your inbox.

Electricity Today T&D Magazine Subscribe for FREE

Stay informed with the latest T&D policies and technologies.
  • Timely insights from industry experts
  • Practical solutions T&D engineers
  • Free access to every issue

Live Online & In-person Group Training

Advantages To Instructor-Led Training – Instructor-Led Course, Customized Training, Multiple Locations, Economical, CEU Credits, Course Discounts.

Request For Quotation

Whether you would prefer Live Online or In-Person instruction, our electrical training courses can be tailored to meet your company's specific requirements and delivered to your employees in one location or at various locations.