Niagara tunnel project could be three years late


Protective Relay Training - Basic

Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.

  • Live Online
  • 12 hours Instructor-led
  • Group Training Available
Regular Price:
$699
Coupon Price:
$599
Reserve Your Seat Today
Ontario Power Generation confirmed today that its Niagara tunnel project could be three years late in a worst-case scenario, but the province-owned power producer denied reports that the cost of the hydroelectric venture is at risk of more than doubling.

The tunnel is being built to divert more water from Niagara Falls to the Adam Beck power station, which will be able to generate enough additional electricity to power 160,000 homes.

But Big Becky, the massive boring machine that's digging the 10-kilometre, 14-metre wide tunnel has run into some dangerous rock conditions and is behind schedule. OPG disclosed late last year that the project will be late and over budget, but the details are still under review.

Global News, citing an interview with John Murphy, OPG's executive vice-president of hydro, reported that the project could cost $1.6 billion and be three years late under a worst-case scenario. It also reported the original cost estimate as $600 million.

However, OPG spokesperson Ted Gruetzner told the Star that the original estimate was $985 million. He doesn't dispute the $1.6 billion figure, just the suggestion it's more than doubling the cost of the project. In reality it would represent a 62 per cent increase.

Gruetzner also said it's unclear how much of that additional costs, if any, will be borne by electricity ratepayers. OPG is still negotiating its contract with Strabag AG, the Austrian company leading the project. A dispute review board is expected to determine who will bear the cost or whether it should be shared between the two parties.

"Once we do get the final timelines we'll announce that," said Gruetzner, adding that the update could come next month.

OPG says that even in a worst-case scenario the project is still economical because the tunnel will deliver clean electricity for more than 90 years. But critics say the company should have known about the rock conditions before committing to such a complex engineering project.

Related News

Spent fuel removal at Fukushima nuclear plant delayed up to 5 years

Fukushima Daiichi decommissioning delay highlights TEPCO's revised timeline, spent fuel removal at Units 1 and…
View more

Ukraine Leans on Imports to Keep the Lights On

Ukraine Electricity Imports surge to record levels as EU neighbors bolster grid stability amid Russian…
View more

Parsing Ontario's electricity cost allocation

Ontario Global Adjustment and ICI balance hydro rates, renewable cost shift, and peak demand. Class…
View more

New energy projects seek to lower electricity costs in Southeast Alaska

Southeast Alaska Energy Projects advance hydroelectric, biomass, and heat pumps, displacing diesel via grants. Inside…
View more

Europe’s Big Oil Companies Are Turning Electric

European Oil Majors Energy Transition highlights BP, Shell, and Total rapidly scaling renewables, wind and…
View more

What Will Drive Utility Revenue When Electricity Is Free?

AI-Powered Utility Customer Experience enables transparency, real-time pricing, smart thermostats, demand response, and billing optimization,…
View more

Sign Up for Electricity Forum’s Newsletter

Stay informed with our FREE Newsletter — get the latest news, breakthrough technologies, and expert insights, delivered straight to your inbox.

Electricity Today T&D Magazine Subscribe for FREE

Stay informed with the latest T&D policies and technologies.
  • Timely insights from industry experts
  • Practical solutions T&D engineers
  • Free access to every issue

Download the 2026 Electrical Training Catalog

Explore 50+ live, expert-led electrical training courses –

  • Interactive
  • Flexible
  • CEU-cerified