North Korea, U.S. fail to agree on nuclear talks


NFPA 70E Training

Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.

  • Live Online
  • 6 hours Instructor-led
  • Group Training Available
Regular Price:
$199
Coupon Price:
$149
Reserve Your Seat Today
U.S. and North Korean envoys failed to reach an agreement on when to resume six-party disarmament negotiations on Pyongyang's atomic weapons program.

U.S. Assistant Secretary of State Christopher Hill said that after two days of talks with his North Korean counterpart, Vice Foreign Minister Kim Kye Gwan, he planned to leave Beijing without a follow-up meeting.

A U.S. Embassy statement said that Mr. Hill's delegation “shared ideas that could help ensure progress when the six-party talks resume,” without elaborating.

“The DPRK promised to study these ideas,” the statement said, using the acronym for the North's official name, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

The heads of delegations from the three countries “frankly and deeply exchanged views on the issue of promoting the process of the six-party talks and improve mutual understanding,” China's Foreign Ministry said on its Web site. “The three parties also agreed to strive for the progress of the talks.”

Mr. Hill, who had been scheduled to fly to Seoul after Beijing, cancelled the trip, said Susan Stevenson, spokeswoman for the U.S. Embassy in Beijing. She did not give a reason, but said Mr. Hill now planned to leave for Washington with a possible stopover in Japan.

Japan's Kyodo News agency cited unidentified people at the talks as saying that Mr. Kim demanded that the U.S. lift financial sanctions and freeze UN sanctions that were imposed after the North's first nuclear test on Oct. 9.

Mr. Hill responded by saying that the possible lifting of financial sanctions can be discussed during the talks and working level discussions, which are expected to be held simultaneously, Kyodo said.

Similar stances were taken when the three met bilaterally and trilaterally recently, Japanese and South Korean media have reported.

North Korea agreed in September 2005 to abandon its nuclear program in exchange for security guarantees and aid. But Washington imposed the financial sanctions against a Macau-based bank on suspicions it was laundering counterfeit money for the North Koreans. Angered by the move, Pyongyang withdrew from the talks two months later.

The six-party talks involve the United States, North Korea, Japan, South Korea and Russia, which has not sent an envoy to Beijing.

State Department spokesman Sean McCormack said in Washington that the main goal of the Beijing meetings was to “make sure that everybody, at least, has a good, solid understanding of what might happen” when the six-nation talks resume.

Mr. Kim said earlier that the timing of the next round of six-nation talks “depends on the United States.”

Mr. Kim's trip to Beijing — a rare overseas visit — and the presence of other negotiators had lifted expectations that there could be a breakthrough in ongoing efforts to restart the talks.

An unannounced meeting between Mr. Hill and Mr. Kim last month in Beijing led to Pyongyang agreeing to return to the arms negotiations amid heightened tensions after the Oct. 9 nuclear test.

Meanwhile, a South Korean lawmaker said North Korea could conduct an additional nuclear test next month or early next year unless the United States offers economic concessions such as lifting financial restrictions.

“I believe that there are specific movements in North Korea to prepare for a second nuclear test,” said opposition lawmaker Chung Hyung-keun, citing information obtained by state intelligence agencies, according to his office.

Related News

Mines found at Ukraine's Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant, UN watchdog says

Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Plant Mines reported by IAEA at the Russian-occupied site: anti-personnel devices in a…
View more

Victims of California's mega-fire will sue electricity company

PG&E Wildfire Lawsuit alleges utility negligence, inadequate infrastructure maintenance, and faulty transmission lines, as victims…
View more

Website Providing Electricity Purchase Options Offered Fewer Choices For Spanish-speakers

Texas PUC Spanish Power to Choose mandates bilingual parity in deregulated electricity markets, ensuring equal…
View more

How Alberta’s lithium-laced oil fields can fuel the electric vehicle revolution

Alberta Lithium Brine can power EV batteries via direct lithium extraction, leveraging oilfield infrastructure and…
View more

PG&E Rates Set to Stabilize in 2025

PG&E 2024 Rate Hikes signal sharp increases to fund wildfire safety, infrastructure upgrades, and CPUC-backed…
View more

California's solar energy gains go up in wildfire smoke

California Wildfire Smoke Impact on Solar reduces photovoltaic output, as particulate pollution, soot, and haze…
View more

Sign Up for Electricity Forum’s Newsletter

Stay informed with our FREE Newsletter — get the latest news, breakthrough technologies, and expert insights, delivered straight to your inbox.

Electricity Today T&D Magazine Subscribe for FREE

Stay informed with the latest T&D policies and technologies.
  • Timely insights from industry experts
  • Practical solutions T&D engineers
  • Free access to every issue

Live Online & In-person Group Training

Advantages To Instructor-Led Training – Instructor-Led Course, Customized Training, Multiple Locations, Economical, CEU Credits, Course Discounts.

Request For Quotation

Whether you would prefer Live Online or In-Person instruction, our electrical training courses can be tailored to meet your company's specific requirements and delivered to your employees in one location or at various locations.