Nuclear facility workers indicted


CSA Z462 Arc Flash Training – Electrical Safety Compliance Course

Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.

  • Live Online
  • 6 hours Instructor-led
  • Group Training Available
Regular Price:
$249
Coupon Price:
$199
Reserve Your Seat Today
Two former FirstEnergy employees and a contractor allegedly used "tricks, schemes and devices" to cover up details about damage at the Davis-Besse nuclear power plant, according to a five-count federal indictment.

Using false statements, video and letters in late 2001, the indictment said, the three misled the Nuclear Regulatory Commission during what is now called the fourth-worst nuclear power incident in U.S. history.

A grand jury in Cleveland recently indicted David Geisen and Andrew Siemaszko, former FirstEnergy employees, and Rodney Cook, a contractor the utility hired.

The men are accused of concealing acid leaks that nearly ate through the 6-inch steel top of Davis-Besse's reactor head.

The NRC estimated the reactor lining would have failed in two to 22 months if the hole had not been discovered in March 2002.

Davis-Besse is on the Lake Erie shore in Oak Harbor.

FirstEnergy Corp. spokesman Todd Schneider said the Akron utility had little comment regarding the indictments.

Geisen and Siemaszko left the company in the fall of 2003. Cook, the consultant, was never a FirstEnergy employee, he said.

None of the three could be located for comment.

In August 2001, the NRC warned FirstEnergy that plants similar to Davis-Besse were experiencing problems with acid leaks and asked the Akron utility to report on the condition of its nuclear power plant by the end of the year.

In oral and written reports, the men falsely assured the NRC that Davis-Besse had been thoroughly inspected and had no problems, according to the indictment.

At the same time, they asked to delay further inspection until a scheduled refueling in 2002.

The three men failed to report problems gaining access to parts of the reactor head where the damage was later found, the indictment said. They allegedly omitted a portion of a video of the reactor that showed large boric acid deposits.

They also are accused of lying when reporting that in 1996 "the entire reactor pressure vessel head was inspected."

The indictment said, "In fact, at least twenty-four nozzles were blocked from view because of boric acid."

The NRC said it would not have allowed the plant to continue to restart after a 2000 inspection if it had known the full measure of the damage at the plant and that the inspections were incomplete.

"Had the NRC known that the plant was being operated with leakage through the reactor vessel head, the agency would have taken immediate action to shut down the plant," James Caldwell, NRC regional administrator, said in a release earlier this month.

Siemaszko has said he was wrongly fired and that he had told supervisors the reactor needed to be cleaned. He said managers rejected his requests.

Both Siemaszko and Geisen were barred by the NRC from working in the nuclear industry for five years.

The plant was safely shut down in 2002.

In September 2002, company officials told the NRC that it is making safety, not profit, the plant's top priority.

FirstEnergy's self-analysis of what went wrong at Davis-Besse reported that previous plant management had emphasized production over safety.

FirstEnergy paid a $5.45 million fine in April for its part in the incident. The corporation was not named in the indictment.

The nuclear plant was restarted in March 2004 after a two-year shutdown.

FirstEnergy spent more than $600 million in repairs and to buy replacement electricity while the plant was shut down.

The indictments represent the last of the investigations into the incident. The case was assigned to U.S. District Court Judge David A. Katz in Toledo.

Related News

Hydro One employees support Province of Ontario in the fight against COVID-19

Hydro One COVID-19 Quarantine Support connects Ontario's Ministry of Health with trained customer service teams…
View more

France's nuclear power stations to limit energy output due to high river temperatures

France Nuclear Heatwave Output Restrictions signal reduced reactor capacity along the Rhone River, as EDF…
View more

Maritime Link almost a reality, as first power cable reaches Nova Scotia

Maritime Link Subsea Cable enables HVDC grid interconnection across the Cabot Strait, linking Nova Scotia…
View more

Why subsidies for electric cars are a bad idea for Canada

EV Subsidies in Canada influence greenhouse-gas emissions based on electricity grid mix; in Ontario and…
View more

USDA Grants $4.37 Billion for Rural Energy Upgrades

USDA Rural Energy Infrastructure Funding boosts renewable energy, BESS, and transmission upgrades, delivering grid modernization,…
View more

The Cool Way Scientists Turned Falling Raindrops Into Electricity

Raindrop Triboelectric Energy Harvesting converts falling water into electricity using Teflon (PTFE) on indium tin…
View more

Sign Up for Electricity Forum’s Newsletter

Stay informed with our FREE Newsletter — get the latest news, breakthrough technologies, and expert insights, delivered straight to your inbox.

Electricity Today T&D Magazine Subscribe for FREE

Stay informed with the latest T&D policies and technologies.
  • Timely insights from industry experts
  • Practical solutions T&D engineers
  • Free access to every issue

Live Online & In-person Group Training

Advantages To Instructor-Led Training – Instructor-Led Course, Customized Training, Multiple Locations, Economical, CEU Credits, Course Discounts.

Request For Quotation

Whether you would prefer Live Online or In-Person instruction, our electrical training courses can be tailored to meet your company's specific requirements and delivered to your employees in one location or at various locations.