FERC Says Con Ed Should Bear Generation Cost


NFPA 70b Training - Electrical Maintenance

Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.

  • Live Online
  • 12 hours Instructor-led
  • Group Training Available
Regular Price:
$699
Coupon Price:
$599
Reserve Your Seat Today
The New York ISO practice of using higher-cost generation resources in New York City to avoid possible power outages when thunderstorms threaten the city but then spread the cost of those generation resources across the state is unfair, FERC said.

In a draft order issued, FERC dismissed arguments by the NY-ISO and Consolidated Edison, the utility serving New York City, that the practice of shifting generation resources during severe weather benefits the entire state.

“Thunderstorm Alert” procedures developed by the New York State Reliability Council prior to the establishment of the NY-ISO stated that because Con Ed’s transmission and distribution system is vulnerable to storm-caused disruptions, more expensive generation resources in New York City and Long Island should be used in place of cheaper resources in upstate New York when storms threaten or occur in Con Ed’s service territory. Storms would theoretically limit the amount of power Con Ed could import from upstate sources, forcing the utility to rely on nearby sources.

FERC accepted the thunderstorm alert procedures when it approved the NY-ISOÂ’s market rules and tariff, but urged the ISO to consider alternatives. Last October, the ISO submitted a report saying the current procedure is appropriate. But the commission disagreed.

“On the merits, the commission finds that the current allocation of thunderstorm alert-related costs is unjust and unreasonable,” the draft order says. “These procedures are mandated by a local reliability rule designed to prevent recurrence of a major blackout in New York City, and which were, prior to the formation of the NY-ISO, the sole responsibility of Con Ed. The specific reliability benefits from these procedures inure solely to benefit New York City load, so that the costs should be allocated solely to that load.”

By spreading costs throughout the state, FERC said Con Ed has no real incentive to try to minimize the costs. The ISOÂ’s consultant, LECG, studied the storm cost issue and suggested two alternatives to the current cost allocation structure: assigning all costs to New York City load; or assigning all costs to both New York City and Long Island load, because some of the power plants that would be called on are located on Long Island. The Long Island Power Authority objected, saying only New York City benefits from the storm procedures. FERC in the draft order agreed with LIPA.

Related News

IEC reaches settlement on Palestinian electricity debt

IEC-PETL Electricity Agreement streamlines grid management, debt settlement, and bank guarantees, shifting power supply, transmission,…
View more

As Maine debates 145-mile electric line, energy giant with billions at stake is absent

Hydro-Quebec NECEC Transmission Line faces Maine PUC scrutiny over clean energy claims, greenhouse gas emissions,…
View more

Europe's Worst Energy Nightmare Is Becoming Reality

European Energy Crisis shocks markets as Russia slashes gas via Nord Stream, spiking prices and…
View more

EV Fires Raise Health Concerns for Firefighters

EV Firefighter Cancer Risks: lithium-ion battery fires, toxic metals like nickel and chromium, hazardous smoke…
View more

Christmas electricity spike equivalent to roasting 1.5 million turkeys: BC Hydro

BC Hydro Holiday Energy Saving Tips highlight electricity usage trends and power conservation during Christmas…
View more

Investigation reveals power company 'gamed' $100M from Ontario's electricity system

Goreway Power Station Overbilling exposed by Ontario Energy Board shows IESO oversight failures, GCG gaming,…
View more

Sign Up for Electricity Forum’s Newsletter

Stay informed with our FREE Newsletter — get the latest news, breakthrough technologies, and expert insights, delivered straight to your inbox.

Electricity Today T&D Magazine Subscribe for FREE

Stay informed with the latest T&D policies and technologies.
  • Timely insights from industry experts
  • Practical solutions T&D engineers
  • Free access to every issue

Live Online & In-person Group Training

Advantages To Instructor-Led Training – Instructor-Led Course, Customized Training, Multiple Locations, Economical, CEU Credits, Course Discounts.

Request For Quotation

Whether you would prefer Live Online or In-Person instruction, our electrical training courses can be tailored to meet your company's specific requirements and delivered to your employees in one location or at various locations.