Proposed power plant questioned by residents


Substation Relay Protection Training

Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.

  • Live Online
  • 12 hours Instructor-led
  • Group Training Available
Regular Price:
$699
Coupon Price:
$599
Reserve Your Seat Today
A public discussion on a controversial hydroelectric power plant proposed for the Lake Elsinore area grew heated as residents questioned project proponents on issues ranging from transportation to the impact on homes near the project area.

About 40 people attended the event sponsored by the nonpartisan Democracy for America Temecula Valley chapter. Several people questioned what benefit the project would have for area residents and called for the project's co-sponsors - the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District and the San Diego County-based Nevada Hydro Co. - to include the public in the process.

"Let us sit in when the water district is meeting with Nevada Hydro," Lakeland Village resident Linda Ridenour said.

The proposed Lake Elsinore Advanced Pump Storage Project, more commonly known as LEAPS, would pump water uphill from Lake Elsinore to a reservoir so it can be released back downhill, powering turbines that generate electricity during peak demand hours.

The electricity would be transmitted in power lines running through about 30 miles of the Cleveland National Forest and would end near Camp Pendleton.

Proponents have said it would fill a need in Southern California by generating 500 megawatts of electricity, as well as stabilizing lake levels, creating economic opportunities and offsetting future costs for lake management.

"The biggest threat to that lake is drought," said Ron Young, general manager of the Elsinore Valley Water District. The project would "create a sustainable environmental solution."

In previous public hearings on the project, opponents have cited many concerns about the project, ranging from environmental impacts to possible fire hazards and the loss of scenic mountain views.

"It can only hinder property values," said water district board member Chris Hyland, who has broken ranks with fellow board members as an outspoken opponent of the project.

The estimated $1.3 billion project has been working its way through a lengthy federal permit process. A final environmental impact report is due later this summer.

Related News

N.L. lags behind Canada in energy efficiency, but there's a silver lining to the stats

Newfoundland and Labrador Energy Efficiency faces low rankings yet signs of progress: heat pumps, EV…
View more

California Forecasts 61% Electricity Demand Growth by 2045

A new California Energy Commission forecast projects a 61 percent rise in electricity demand by…
View more

How to Get Solar Power on a Rainy Day? Beam It From Space

Space solar power promises wireless energy from orbital solar satellites via microwave or laser power…
View more

New Mexico Could Reap $30 Billion Driving on Electricity

New Mexico EV Benefits highlight cheaper fuel, lower maintenance, cleaner air, and smarter charging, cutting…
View more

Tube Strikes Disrupt London Economy

London Tube Strikes Economic Impact highlights transport disruption reducing foot traffic, commuter flows, and tourism,…
View more

BNEF Report: Wind and Solar Will Provide 50% of Electricity in 2050

BNEF 2019 New Energy Outlook projects surging renewable energy demand, aggressive decarbonization, wind and solar…
View more

Sign Up for Electricity Forum’s Newsletter

Stay informed with our FREE Newsletter — get the latest news, breakthrough technologies, and expert insights, delivered straight to your inbox.

Electricity Today T&D Magazine Subscribe for FREE

Stay informed with the latest T&D policies and technologies.
  • Timely insights from industry experts
  • Practical solutions T&D engineers
  • Free access to every issue

Download the 2026 Electrical Training Catalog

Explore 50+ live, expert-led electrical training courses –

  • Interactive
  • Flexible
  • CEU-cerified