Setting the record straight on Oakville station

subscribe

During the protest at Queen's Park against the proposed Oakville Generating Station, unfounded allegations were made about the competitive process used by the Ontario Power Authority (OPA) to select a new natural gas-fired power plant for the Southwest Greater Toronto Area. Those allegations were published in the National Post. As a result, the OPA has a responsibility to set the record straight.

The procurement process overseen by the Power Authority on behalf of the Ontario government was designed to vigorously protect the interests of ratepayers and to operate independently. Four qualified applicants participated in the selection process, including the eventual selected proponent, TransCanada Energy Ltd. Each proposal was evaluated against a number of factors, such as environmental assessment, engineering design, construction arrangements and cost.

The proposals were evaluated by an independent team composed of Power Authority staff (who were not otherwise involved in the bid process) and third parties with expertise in the electricity sector. The chair was a third-party member with both electricity-sector and procurement expertise. All information was held by this bid evaluation team and at no time did I or any members of my executive team have access to the details of the evaluation.

The process was overseen by an external, neutral fairness advisor who ensured that the rules of the competition were followed but who played no role in TransCanada's selection.

The $1.2-billion, 900-megawatt plant that TransCanada proposes to build on a 15-acre site in an industrial area adjacent to the Queen Elizabeth Way is needed to provide power to the fast-growing Southwest GTA region. The peak demand for electricity in this area has grown more than twice as quickly as the provincial average. According to the Ontario Energy Board, Oakville residents consumed more electricity per household in 2008 than any of their GTA neighbours.

The new plant will also enable the elimination of coal-fired generation in Ontario. This initiative began with the closing of the Lakeview generating station, in Mississauga, in 2005. It will continue with the shutdown of Ontario's remaining coal-fired stations, whose emissions have an impact on the region, by the end 2014. This will reduce carbon dioxide emissions by up to 30 megatonnes and is one of the largest climate change initiatives in North America.

It's important to remember, however, that the closing of Lakeview removed 1,140 megawatts of local power, enough electricity for up to a million homes. That's why a new gas-fired plant is needed to ensure that there is a safe and reliable supply of power in the Southwest GTA, one of the most important economic regions in the province. It would not be responsible to build a plant elsewhere and deliver its power to the Southwest GTA because that would require building new high-voltage transmission lines, which would impact many other communities and mean hundreds of millions of dollars in additional costs that would have to borne by the ratepayers of Ontario.

It's important to note as well that emission standards at the plant will be 80% stricter than what the Ministry of the Environment requires. The government has acted on concerns about air quality by appointing a task force to develop a comprehensive plan to reduce emissions from industry, traffic and residences to improve air quality in the region.

In addition, the Power Authority will lead or participate in a variety of programs — worth about $30-million — to reduce energy consumption and to target emissions reductions at local industrial plants. This means that the Southwest GTA will have access to significant funds to enhance conservation efforts that will help improve air quality.

Related News

power lines

Which of the cleaner states imports dirty electricity?

WASHINGTON - In the United States, electricity generation accounts for nearly 30% of our carbon emissions. Some states have responded to that by setting aggressive renewable energy standards; others are hoping to see coal propped up even as its economics get worse. Complicating matters further is the fact that many regional grids are integrated, meaning power generated in one location may be exported and used in a different state entirely.

Tracking these electricity exports is critical for understanding how to lower our national carbon emissions. In addition, power from a dirty source like coal has health and environment impacts where it's…

READ MORE
rising-solar-and-wind-curtailments-in-california

Rising Solar and Wind Curtailments in California

READ MORE

Ontario Reducing Burden on Industrial Electricity Ratepayers

READ MORE

electric tractor

Are we ready for electric tractors?

READ MORE

wyoming wind turbines

WY Utility's First Wind Farm Faces Replacement

READ MORE