Greening hospital operations

By Information Management


Protective Relay Training - Basic

Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.

  • Live Online
  • 12 hours Instructor-led
  • Group Training Available
Regular Price:
$699
Coupon Price:
$599
Reserve Your Seat Today
When it comes to environmentalism in health care, any push to "green" operations is driven as much by the folding kind of green as the leafy variety. It's not that hospital executives are opposed to becoming better environmental stewards. Few are immune to the issue.

Many of those who have made strides toward reducing energy consumption, however, candidly concede their primary motivator was trimming expenses - not softening their carbon footprint. The leaders driving energy reduction programs, electronics recycling and modernized building design are just as likely to wear a suit to work as Birkenstocks. Yet these leaders are keenly aware of the challenges facing health care - which, after the food industry, is the nation's second largest energy user.

While they may be aimed primarily at reducing the utility bill, many local initiatives do have positive impact on the environment. Trimming energy consumption is often the low hanging environmental fruit for hospitals. A culprit in energy consumption is usually the I.T. department. And the CFO is likely to be the leader in trimming the electric bill there and elsewhere.

Yet hospitals have many other venues through which they can become more responsible corporate citizens. Electronics recycling is one. Eliminating paper records is another with direct ramifications for I.T. Beyond that, some hospitals are looking at building design and even food consumption as part of their greening effort.

It's about time, some say. "Health care disproportionately impacts climate change," asserts Gina Pugliese, vice president of the Safety Institute run by Premier Inc., a San Diego-based hospital alliance and group purchasing organization.

Pugliese heads an effort called SPHERE, short for "Securing Proven Healthcare Energy Reduction for the Ecosystem." The cornerstone of the project is an online energy auction service that Premier offers its 200 health system owners.

And for some Premier members, the online auction has proven to be an innovative use of I.T. that results in direct savings - if not indirect benefit to the environment. "We are not opposed to green initiatives, but our primary focus is saving money," says Vince Pryor, CFO at 350-bed Ingalls Health System, Harvey, Ill. "We developed a strategy to do both, by becoming partially green and saving a fair amount of dollars."

Last fall, Ingalls served as a guinea pig for SPHERE's "reverse energy auction," an online service designed to put competitive bidding into the picture for a hospital's natural gas and electrical needs. Like most hospitals, Ingalls is a major energy consumer, spending some $2 million annually on electricity and $1.8 million annually on gas. By participating in the reverse auction, Ingalls shaved some $375,000 off its projected electricity costs over a three-year period and another $465,000 over 17 months off its gas prices.

In addition to reducing its bill compared to historical levels, its three-year electrical contract with Texas-based Pepco includes a small portion of electricity - 5% of the total capacity - from green sources, such as wind or solar power, notes Harold Richards, director of materials management.

It may not seem like much, but Richards points out that by diverting just a small portion of its electrical power from traditional "brown" sources such as a coal, Ingalls is keeping more than 3,400 tons of carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere. "It's equal to about 430 homes," he says.

To participate in the auction, Ingalls sent a request for proposals to eight electrical utilities. Thanks to Illinois' deregulation of electrical suppliers, customers like Ingalls do not have to depend on one local utility company. Yet, in the pre-online auction era, getting a competitive bid was not easy, Richards says. "We would sit with a couple of brokers and try to get the best deal," he recalls.

In the reverse auction, the suppliers already knew Ingalls' electrical power needs. The hospital provided 17 options on which the suppliers could bid. These options broke down the hospital's energy needs over multiple time periods, from two to five years, with varying percentages of green and brown energy. Once the auction started, the suppliers began submitting competitive quotes on the proposals, with Ingalls' executives watching the numbers on a large monitor. "It was like e-Bay," Pryor says. "A lot of hospital executives came in to watch," Richards adds.

In the end, Pepco bid down the number, providing the hospital with the best deal at a three-year price point. Its bid, for example, for a 95/5 brown/green ratio beat other suppliers' bids for 100% brown. Thus, Ingalls was able to get a better price for its electricity and reduce its carbon footprint to boot.

"The challenge is to balance the additional cost of being more green versus the lower reimbursements we are getting," Pryor says. "Green initiatives can be more costly if you are not selective."

Going green, no doubt, is very difficult for health care organizations. Green electricity sources are still in their infancy. Moreover, hospitals face ever-increasing demands for electricity.

Take OSF Healthcare System. The Peoria, Ill.-based delivery system operates seven hospitals across two states in addition to its 160 clinics. Its annual electricity consumption is approximately 195 million kilowatt hours, says Edward McKenzie, corporate plant operations manager. Add 6.5 million therms (a unit of natural gas) to the yearly energy consumption, and you've got a big utility bill.

One of the biggest users of energy is the I.T. department, McKenzie says. "I.T. does not have a good reputation" when it comes to energy savings, he says. Its data centers have voracious energy appetites. And running the servers and laptops needed to sustain 12,000 employees only adds to the demand. "Anything you can do to reduce energy consumption is what we look at," McKenzie says.

The challenge, he adds, is keeping up with the increased energy needs of server racks. "They have gone from 10 to 20 to 35 kilowatts per rack per hour to run," he says. "It generates a tremendous amount of heat."

OSF is using the latest in building design technology to stem the tide. Its new data center in North Peoria, for example, will have a "free cooling" system. It will use naturally chilled air from outside to help maintain an appropriate temperature inside. And Ingalls also is upgrading its HVAC technology throughout the system, particularly when it builds new facilities. "We use the LEED guidelines," McKenzie says, referencing the building design standards advocated by the U.S. Green Building Council.

Its Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design Green Building Rating System provides standards for environmentally sustainable construction. Before OSF adopts any LEED standards, however, it analyzes the technology for its return, McKenzie says.

OSF Healthcare is replacing its legacy electrical chillers with more modern technology, he adds. The newer chillers are far more energy efficient, a major plus in keeping the hospital temperate and avoiding a boiler room in the data center. In fact, one modern chiller may only cost $35,000 annually to operate, compared to its $50,000 predecessor. Moreover, the modern chiller does not use ozone-depleting refrigerants, McKenzie notes.

CIOs are not oblivious to the energy demand created by their department. Lior Blik, acting CIO at Hoboken (N.J.) Medical Center, transitioned in 2007 to a "virtual server" environment in part to drive down operating costs. Rather than having a dedicated server for each application, the virtual infrastructure enables Hoboken to run multiple applications on fewer servers. His department maintains an armament of nearly 70 servers, but would have required 100 under the old set-up. "The electrical bill is down 25%," says Blik, who is CEO of NITConnect, a New York-based consulting company.

Hoboken's next big project will be digitizing its paper records. The hospital spends some $750,000 annually on paper alone, including specialized carbon forms, he says. Eliminating the paper, he adds, can only help the environment.

Other areas figure into hospitals' green-supportive projects. Cook Children's Healthcare Network, Fort Worth, Texas, for example, redirected its electronics recycling program about one year ago. To keep old computers out of landfill, Cook Children's sells the equipment to its staff. But the labor required to cleanse the computers of confidential data, store the computers and maintain the inventory proved overwhelming, says Michael Zachary, interim director of operations in the information systems department. "The amount of time needed was a distraction," he says.

Cook Children's turned to a local company, Grand Prairie, Texas-based Argus Connection Inc., to handle the device cleansing. Argus picks up used equipment each month, documents the inventory, removes confidential data and recycles any equipment not suitable for re-sale to the staff. Proper recycling of electronics is a must, says Zachary, who points to reports that many used U.S. computers wind up as third-world landfill. Cook Children's also offers free electronics recycling to employees who tote in old televisions or cell phones.

The unstated irony in all these projects is that the modern hospital is perhaps among the most environmentally unfriendly settings around. That's the viewpoint of Kathy Gerwig, vice president of workplace safety and environmental stewardship officer for Kaiser Permanente, an Oakland-based delivery system than encompasses a health plan and more than 30 hospitals across nine states.

Kaiser's taking a multi-pronged approach to becoming a greener organization, she says. It wants to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions and ensure safety in the use and destruction of chemicals. The program includes eliminating vinyl, an almost ubiquitous substance found in older hospitals. Its manufacture and destruction can be highly toxic, Gerwig says.

As it retrofits old hospitals and builds new ones, Kaiser is turning to rubber flooring to replace the vinyl. Rubber, Gerwig says, is the new environmental standard for hospital flooring. "It is not environmentally benign, but it has a longer lifespan and does not require chemical cleaning," she observes. In addition, Kaiser is promoting locally grown and organic produce by hosting farmers' markets at most of its hospitals. In some underserved areas, they provide the only source of fresh produce, Gerwig says.

When it comes to thinking green, health care executives also need to think big, Gerwig says. "People understand the cost benefits around energy savings, but they don't make the direct link to people's health," provided by a healthy care-giving environment, she says. "There is only so much you can do in the doctor's office. People also need a healthy place to live and work."

Related News

Groups clash over NH hydropower project

Northern Pass Hydropower Project Rehearing faces review by New Hampshire's Site Evaluation Committee as Eversource seeks approval for a 192-mile transmission line, citing energy cost relief, while Massachusetts eyes Central Maine Power as an alternative.

 

Key Points

A review of Eversource's halted NH transmission plan, weighing impacts, costs, and alternatives.

✅ SEC denied project, Eversource seeks rehearing

✅ 192-mile line to bring Canadian hydropower to NE

✅ Alternative bids include Central Maine Power corridor

 

Groups supporting and opposing the Northern Pass hydropower project in New Hampshire filed statements Friday in advance of a state committee’s meeting next week on whether it should rehear the project.

The Site Evaluation Committee rejected the transmission proposal last month over concerns about potential negative impacts. It is scheduled to deliberate Monday on Eversource’s request for a rehearing.

The $1.6 billion project would deliver hydropower from Canada, including Hydro-Quebec exports, to customers in southern New England through a 192-mile transmission line in New Hampshire.

If the Northern Pass project fails to ultimately win New Hampshire approval, the Massachusetts Department of Energy Resources has announced it will begin negotiating with a team led by Central Maine Power Co. for a $950 million project through a 145-mile Maine transmission line as an alternative.

Separately, construction later began on the disputed $1 billion electricity corridor despite ongoing legal and political challenges.

The Business and Industry Association voted last month to endorse the project after remaining neutral on it since it was first proposed in 2010. A letter sent to the committee Friday urges it to resume deliberations. The association said it is concerned about the severe impact the committee’s decision could have on New Hampshire’s economic future, even as Connecticut overhauls electricity market structure across New England.

“The BIA believes this decision was premature and puts New Hampshire’s economy at risk,” organization President Jim Roche wrote. “New Hampshire’s electrical energy prices are consistently 50-60 percent higher than the national average. This has forced employers to explore options outside New Hampshire and new England to obtain lower electricity prices. Businesses from outside New Hampshire and others now here are reversing plans to grow in New Hampshire due to the Site Evaluation Committee’s decision.”

The International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers and the Coos County Business and Employers Group also filed a statement in support of rehearing the project.

The Society to Protect New Hampshire Forests, which is opposed to the project, said Eversource’s request is premature because the committee hasn’t issued a final written decision yet. It also said Eversource hasn’t proven committee members “made an unlawful or unreasonable decision or mistakenly overlooked matters it should have considered.”

As part of its request for reconsideration, Eversource said it is offering up to $300 million in reductions to low-income and business customers in the state.

It also is offering to allocate $95 million from a previously announced $200 million community fund — $25 million to compensate for declining property values, $25 million for economic development and $25 million to promote tourism in affected areas. Another $20 million would fund energy efficiency programs.

 

Related News

View more

Britain breaks record for coal-free power generation - but what does this mean for your energy bills?

UK Coal-Free Electricity Record highlights rapid growth in renewables as National Grid phases out coal; wind, solar, and offshore projects surge, green tariffs expand, and energy comparison helps consumers switch to cheaper, cleaner deals.

 

Key Points

Britain's longest coal-free run, enabled by renewables, lower demand, and grid shifts for cheaper, greener tariffs.

✅ Record set after two months without coal-fired generation

✅ Renewables outpace fossil fuels; wind and solar dominate

✅ Green tariffs expand; prices at three-year lows

 

On Wednesday 10 June, Britain hit a significant landmark: the UK went for two full months without burning coal to generate power – that's the longest period since the 1880s, following earlier milestones such as a full week without coal power in the recent past.

According to the National Grid, Britain has now run its electricity network without burning coal since midnight on the 9 April. This coal-free period has beaten the country’s previous record of 18 days, six hours and 10 minutes, which was set in June 2019, even though low-carbon generation stalled in 2019 according to analyses.

With such a shift in Britain’s drive for renewables and lower electricity demand following the coronavirus lockdown, as Britain recorded its cleanest electricity during lockdown to date, now may be the perfect time to do an online energy comparison and switch to a cheaper, greener deal.

Only a decade ago, around 40 per cent of Britain’s electricity came from coal generation, but since then the country has gradually shifted towards renewable energy, with the coal share at record lows in the system today. When Britain was forced into lockdown in response to the coronavirus pandemic, electricity demand dropped sharply, and the National Grid took the four remaining coal-fired plants off the network.

Over the past 10 years, Britain has invested heavily in renewable energy. Back in 2010, only 3 per cent of the country's electricity came from wind and solar, and many people remained sceptical. However, now, the UK has the biggest offshore wind industry in the world. Plus, last year, construction of the world’s single largest wind farm was completed off the coast of Yorkshire.

At the same time, Drax – Britain’s biggest power plant – has started to switch from burning coal to burning compressed wooden pellets instead, reflecting the UK's progress as it keeps breaking its coal-free energy record again across the grid. By this time next year, the plant hopes to have phased out coal entirely.

So far this year, renewables have generated more power than all fossil fuels put together, the BBC reports, and the energy dashboard shows the current mix in real time. Renewables have been responsible for 37 per cent of electricity supplied to the network, with wind and solar surpassing nuclear for the first time, while fossil fuels have accounted for 35 per cent. During the same period, nuclear accounted for 18 per cent and imports made up the remaining 10 per cent.

What does this mean for consumers?

As the country’s electricity supply moves more towards renewables, customers have more choice than ever before. Most of the ‘Big Six’ energy companies now have tariffs that offer 100 per cent green electricity. On top of this, specialist green energy suppliers such as Bulb, Octopus and Green Energy UK make it easier than ever to find a green energy tariff.

The good news is that our energy comparison research suggests that green energy doesn’t have to cost you more than a traditional fixed-price energy contract would. In fact, some of the cheapest energy suppliers are actually green companies.

At present, energy bills are at three-year lows, which means that now is the perfect time to switch supplier. As prices remain low and renewables begin to dominate the marketplace, more switchers will be drawn to green energy deals than ever before.

However, if you’re interested in choosing a green energy supplier, make sure that you look at the company's fuel mix. This way, you’ll be able to see whether they are guaranteeing the usage of green energy, or whether they’re just offsetting your usage. All suppliers must report how their energy is generated to Ofgem, so you’ll easily be able to compare providers.

You may find that you pay more for a supplier that generates its own energy from renewables, or pay less if the supplier simply matches your usage by buying green energy. You can decide which option is right for you after comparing the prices.

 

Related News

View more

Bruce nuclear reactor taken offline as $2.1B project 'officially' begins

Bruce Power Unit 6 refurbishment replaces major reactor components, shifting supply to hydroelectric and natural gas, sustaining Ontario jobs, extending plant life to 2064, and managing radioactive waste along Lake Huron, on-time and on-budget.

 

Key Points

A 4-year, $2.1B reactor overhaul within a 13-year, $13B program to extend plant life to 2064 and support Ontario jobs.

✅ Unit 6 offline 4 years; capacity shift to hydro and gas

✅ Part of 13-year, $13B program; extends life to 2064

✅ Creates jobs; manages radioactive waste at Lake Huron

 

The world’s largest nuclear fleet, became a little smaller Monday morning. Bruce Power has began the process to take Unit 6 offline to begin a $2.1 billion project, supported by manufacturing contracts with key suppliers, to replace all the major components of the reactor.

The reactor, which produces enough electricity to power 750,000 homes and reflects higher output after upgrades across the site, will be out of service for the next four years.

In its place, hydroelectric power and natural gas will be utilized more.

Taking Unit 6 offline is just the “official” beginning of a 13-year, $13-billion project to refurbish six of Bruce Power’s eight nuclear reactors, as Ontario advances the Pickering B refurbishment as well on its grid.

Work to extend the life of the nuclear plant started in 2016, and the company recently marked an operating record while supporting pandemic response, but the longest and hardest part of the project - the major component replacement - begins now.

“The Unit 6 project marks the next big step in a long campaign to revitalize this site,” says Mike Rencheck, Bruce Power’s president and CEO.

The overall project is expected to last until 2033, and mirrors life extensions at Pickering supporting Ontario’s zero-carbon goals, but will extend the life of the nuclear plant until 2064.

Extending the life of the Bruce Power nuclear plant will sustain 22,000 jobs in Ontario and add $4 billion a year in economic activity to the province, say Bruce Power officials.

About 2,000 skilled tradespeople will be required for each of the six reactor refurbishments - 4,200 people already work at the sprawling nuclear plant near Kincardine.

It will also mean tons of radioactive nuclear waste will be created that is currently stored in buildings on the Bruce Power site, along the shores of Lake Huron.

Bruce Power restarted two reactors back in 2012, and in later years doubled a PPE donation to support regional health partners. That project was $2-billion over-budget, and three years behind schedule.

Bruce Power officials say this refurbishment project is currently on-time and on-budget.

 

Related News

View more

International Atomic Energy Agency agency commends China's nuclear security

IAEA Nuclear Security Mission in China reviews regulatory frameworks, physical protection, and compliance at nuclear power plants, endorsing CAEA efforts, IPPAS guidance, and capacity building to strengthen safeguards, risk management, and global cooperation.

 

Key Points

An IAEA advisory visit assessing China's nuclear security, physical protection, and regulatory frameworks.

✅ Reviews laws, regulations, and physical protection measures

✅ Endorses CAEA, COE, and IPPAS-aligned best practices

✅ Recommends accelerated rulemaking for expanding reactors

 

The International Atomic Energy Agency commended China's efforts and accomplishments in nuclear security after conducting its first nuclear security advisory mission to the nation, according to the China Atomic Energy Authority.

The two-week International Physical Protection Advisory Service mission, from Aug 28to Saturday, reviewed the legislative and regulatory framework for nuclear security as well as the physical protection of nuclear material and facilities, including worker safety protocols during health emergencies.

An eight-member expert team led by Joseph Sandoval of the United States' Sandia National Laboratories visited Fangjiashan Nuclear Power Plant, part of the Qinshan Nuclear Power Station in Zhejiang province, to examine security arrangements and observe physical protection measures, where recognized safety culture practices can reinforce performance.

The experts also met with officials from several Chinese government bodies involved in nuclear security such as the China Atomic Energy Authority, National Nuclear Safety Administration and Ministry of Public Security.

The international agency has carried out 78 of the protection missions in 48 member states since 1995. This was the first in China, it said.

The China Atomic Energy Authority said on Tuesday that a report by the experts highly approves of the Chinese government's continuous efforts to strengthen nuclear safety, to boost the sustainable development of the nuclear power industry and to help establish a global nuclear security system.

The report identifies the positive roles played by the State Nuclear Security Technology Center and its subsidiary, the Center of Excellence on Nuclear Security, in enhancing China's nuclear security capability and supporting regional and global cooperation in the field, such as bilateral cooperation agreements that advance research and standards, officials at the China Atomic Energy Authority said.

"A strong commitment to nuclear security is a must for any state that uses nuclear power for electricity generation and that is planning to significantly expand this capacity by constructing new power reactors," said Muhammad Khaliq, head of the international agency's nuclear security of materials and facilities section. "China'sexample in applying IAEA nuclear security guidance and using IAEA advisory services demonstrates its strong commitment to nuclear security and its enhancement worldwide."

The report notes that along with the rapid growth of China's nuclear power sector, challenges have emerged when it comes to the country's nuclear security mechanism and management, as highlighted by grid reliability warnings during pandemics in other markets.

It suggests that the Chinese government accelerate the making of laws and regulations to better govern this sector.

Deng Ge, director of the State Nuclear Security Technology Center, said the IAEAmission would help China strengthen its nuclear security since the nation could learn from other countries' successful experience, including on-site staffing measures to maintain critical operations, and find out its weaknesses for rectification.

Deng added that the mission's report can help the international community understand China's contributions to the global nuclear security system and also offer China's best practices to other nations.

 

Related News

View more

Major U.S. utilities spending more on electricity delivery, less on power production

U.S. Utility Spending Shift highlights rising transmission and distribution costs, grid modernization, and smart meters, while generation expenses decline amid fuel price volatility, capital and labor pressures, and renewable integration across the power sector.

 

Key Points

A decade-long trend where utilities spend more on delivery and grid upgrades, and less on electricity generation costs.

✅ Delivery O&M, wires, poles, and meters drive rising costs

✅ Generation spending declines amid fuel price changes and PPI

✅ Grid upgrades add reliability, resilience, and renewable integration

 

Over the past decade, major utilities in the United States have been spending more on delivering electricity to customers and less on producing that electricity, a shift occurring as electricity demand is flat across many regions.

After adjusting for inflation, major utilities spent 2.6 cents per kilowatthour (kWh) on electricity delivery in 2010, using 2020 dollars. In comparison, spending on delivery was 65% higher in 2020 at 4.3 cents/kWh, and residential bills rose in 2022 as inflation persisted. Conversely, utility spending on power production decreased from 6.8 cents/kWh in 2010 (using 2020 dollars) to 4.6 cents/kWh in 2020.

Utility spending on electricity delivery includes the money spent to build, operate, and maintain the electric wires, poles, towers, and meters that make up the transmission and distribution system. In real 2020 dollar terms, spending on electricity delivery increased every year from 1998 to 2020 as utilities worked to replace aging equipment, build transmission infrastructure to accommodate new wind and solar generation amid clean energy transition challenges that affect costs, and install new technologies such as smart meters to increase the efficiency, reliability, resilience, and security of the U.S. power grid.

Spending on power production includes the money spent to build, operate, fuel, and maintain power plants, as well as the cost to purchase power in cases where the utility either does not own generators or does not generate enough to fulfill customer demand. Spending on electricity production includes the cost of fuels including natural gas prices alongside capital, labor, and building materials, as well as the type of generators being built.

Other utility spending on electricity includes general and administrative expenses, general infrastructure such as office space, and spending on intangible goods such as licenses and franchise fees, even as electricity sales declined in recent years.

The retail price of electricity reflects the cost to produce and deliver power, the rate of return on investment that regulated utilities are allowed, and profits for unregulated power suppliers, and, as electricity prices at 41-year high have been reported, these components have drawn increased scrutiny.

In 2021, demand for consumer goods and the energy needed to produce them has been outpacing supply, though power demand sliding in 2023 with milder weather has also been noted. This difference has contributed to higher prices for fuels used by electric generators, especially natural gas. The increased cost for fuel, capital, labor, and building materials, as seen in the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics’ Producer Price Index, is increasing the cost of power production for 2021. U.S. average electricity prices have been higher every month of this year compared with 2020, according to our Monthly Electric Power Industry Report.

 

Related News

View more

Electricity Market Headed for a Reshuffle as Province Vows Overhaul

Alberta Electricity Market Overhaul will add renewables like wind and solar, curb price volatility tied to natural gas, boost competition, and reward energy efficiency, while safeguarding grid reliability and investor confidence through a transition roadmap.

 

Key Points

Alberta's 2027 market redesign adds renewables, boosts competition, and cuts volatility to protect reliability.

✅ Integrates wind and solar to meet climate and affordability goals.

✅ Increases competition and efficiency; reduces price volatility.

✅ Plans transition measures to maintain reliability and investment.

 

Alberta's electricity market is on the precipice of a significant transformation. The province, long reliant on fossil fuels for power generation, has committed to a market overhaul by 2027. This ambitious plan promises to shake up the current system, but industry players are wary of a lengthy period of uncertainty that could stifle much-needed investment in the sector.

The impetus for change stems from a confluence of factors. Soaring energy bills for consumers, reflecting rising electricity prices across the province, coupled with concerns about Alberta's environmental footprint, have pressured the government to seek a more sustainable and cost-effective electricity system. The current market, heavily influenced by natural gas prices, has been criticized for volatility and a lack of incentive for renewable energy development.

The details of the new electricity market design are still being formulated. However, the government has outlined some key objectives. One priority is to incorporate more renewable energy sources like wind and solar power into the grid. This aligns with Alberta's climate change goals and could lead to cleaner electricity generation, supporting the province's path to clean electricity in the coming years.

Another objective is to introduce more competition within the market. The current system is dominated by a few large players, and the government hopes increased competition will drive down prices for consumers, as the market needs more competition to function efficiently.

While the potential benefits of the overhaul are undeniable, industry leaders are apprehensive about the transition period, with a Calgary retailer urging the government to scrap the overhaul amid uncertainty. The lack of clarity surrounding the new market design creates uncertainty for power companies. This could discourage investment in new generation facilities, both renewable and traditional, potentially leading to supply shortages in the future.

John Kousinioris, CEO of TransAlta, a major Alberta power generator, expressed these concerns. "We need a clear roadmap for the future," he stated. "Uncertainty makes it difficult to justify significant investments in new power plants, which are essential to ensure a reliable electricity supply for Albertans."

The government acknowledges the need to minimize disruption during the transition. They have promised to engage in consultations with industry stakeholders throughout the redesign process, as the province changes how it produces and pays for electricity to support long-term stability. Additionally, measures may be implemented to ensure a smooth transition and provide some level of certainty for investors.

The success of Alberta's electricity market overhaul will depend on several factors. Striking a balance between environmental sustainability, affordability, and energy security will be crucial. The government must design a system that incentivizes investment in new, cleaner power generation while maintaining reliable electricity supply at a reasonable cost for consumers.

The role of natural gas, a dominant player in Alberta's current electricity mix, is another point of contention. While the government aims to incorporate more renewables, natural gas is likely to remain a part of the equation for some time. Determining the appropriate role for natural gas in the future market will be a critical decision.

The upcoming years will be a period of significant change for Alberta's electricity market. The province's commitment to a cleaner and more competitive system holds promise, but navigating the transition effectively will be a complex challenge. Open communication, collaboration between stakeholders, and a well-defined roadmap for the future will be essential for ensuring a successful electricity market overhaul and a brighter energy future for Alberta.

 

Related News

View more

Sign Up for Electricity Forum’s Newsletter

Stay informed with our FREE Newsletter — get the latest news, breakthrough technologies, and expert insights, delivered straight to your inbox.

Electricity Today T&D Magazine Subscribe for FREE

Stay informed with the latest T&D policies and technologies.
  • Timely insights from industry experts
  • Practical solutions T&D engineers
  • Free access to every issue

Download the 2025 Electrical Training Catalog

Explore 50+ live, expert-led electrical training courses –

  • Interactive
  • Flexible
  • CEU-cerified