Worst polluters increased mercury emissions


Protective Relay Training - Basic

Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.

  • Live Online
  • 12 hours Instructor-led
  • Group Training Available
Regular Price:
$699
Coupon Price:
$599
Reserve Your Seat Today

U.S. power plant mercury emissions drive toxic air pollution from coal-fired utilities, EPA TRI data show, impacting public health, waterways, and fish, with leading emitters including Luminant, AEP, Southern Company, Entergy, Ameren, and NRG.

 

Main Details

Mercury from coal-fired plants, tracked by EPA TRI, contaminates waters and air and poses neurotoxic risks to babies and children.

  • Six utilities lead in total pounds: Luminant, AEP, Southern, Entergy, Ameren, NR
  • Power plants emit over 40% of U.S. mercury air pollution
  • EPA TRI and Clean Air Markets data underpin rankings
  • Texas hosts five of the top ten mercury emitters

 

More than half (27) of the nation’s 50 worst power plants for mercury emissions increased their mercury emissions from 2007 to 2008 (the latest year for which data is available), according to a new report from the nonprofit and nonpartisan Environmental Integrity Project (EIP).

 

The six leading U.S. power suppliers with three or more plants on the mercury emission list by total pounds include Luminant (formerly TXU), American Electric Power (AEP), Southern Company, Entergy, Ameren, and NRG.

The power plants that provide electricity to run America’s homes, businesses, and factories are also the single largest source of mercury air pollution, as some coal power plants produce more than their fair share, responsible for more than 40 percent of all mercury emissions nationwide. Mercury is a highly toxic metal, and once released into the atmosphere, it settles in lakes and rivers, where it moves up the food chain to humans.

According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, roughly half of the nation’s lakes and reservoirs have levels of mercury that exceed safe levels. Each year, more than 300,000 newborn babies may have an increased risk of learning disabilities due to in utero exposure to mercury, which is a neurotoxin that causes impaired neurological development in fetuses, infants and children.

Other key EIP report findings include the following:

• The top 50 power plant mercury emitters were essentially flat from 2007 to 2008, though some plant officials argue the ‘dirtiest’ list data are outdated for that period, with mercury emissions off by a paltry 0.26 percent.

• Texas is home to the largest mercury emitter — Luminant’s Martin Lake power plant, which reported a 4.56 percent increase from 2007 to 2008. In fact, the Lone Star State claims five of the 10 largest power plant mercury air pollution sites in the nation, placing several among America’s dirtiest power plants by reported mercury emissions.

• A total of 15 states had two or more of the 50 largest power plants for mercury emissions – Texas (7), Alabama (4), Pennsylvania (4), Indiana (3), North Dakota (3), Ohio (3), West Virginia (3), Arkansas (2), Arizona (2), Georgia (2), Illinois (2), Kansas (2), Louisiana (2), Missouri (2), and Wisconsin (2).

• Overall, power plant mercury emissions from electric utilities decreased 4.7 percent from 2007 to 2008, while North Carolina plants reported lower mercury emissions in subsequent years as well, at the same time that gross power generation declined roughly 2 percent.

Environmental Integrity Project Senior Attorney Ilan Levin said: “Despite years of promises, the electric power industry has barely made a dent in its mercury emissions this decade. This slow progress is nowhere near the levels that would be achieved if all plants installed modern pollution controls. The nation’s power plants are not even close to meeting the levels that EPA forecasted under a weak Bush Administration power plant mercury rule that was subsequently thrown out by a court ruling on mercury in federal court.”

Glen Hooks, regional director, Sierra Club Beyond Coal Campaign said: “Texans and other Americans do not need to live with the dangerous risks posed by mercury pollution from power plants. Pollution controls that dramatically reduce mercury emissions are widely available, and are already being used at many power plants. But, until the public and policymakers hold the electric power industry to its promises to shut down or clean up the nation’s oldest and dirtiest plants, Americans will continue to bear unnecessary health and environmental costs.”

Other key findings in the EIP report include the following:

• Power plant mercury emissions have actually risen since 2000 (the first year this data was reported) in several states, including Arkansas, Arizona, Georgia, Iowa, Illinois, Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Texas, and others.

• Six Southern Company plants in Georgia and Alabama rank high among polluters for overall mercury emissions across the top 50 list.

• Six American Electric Power (AEP) plants in Texas, Ohio, Indiana and West Virginia are ranked among the top 50 mercury emitters. AEP’s Gavin Power Plant in Ohio emitted 937 pounds of mercury in 2008, a 115.4 percent increase from 2007. This drastic increase in mercury emissions appears to be due largely to a change in the coal burned at the plant in 2008.

• NRG’s Limestone County, Texas plant emitted 1,251 pounds of mercury in 2008, a 4.55 percent increase over its reported 2007 emissions. NRG is currently constructing a third coal-fired boiler at this plant.

• In terms of pounds of mercury emitted per gigawatt hour, the following companies have three or more power plants on the list: Ameren (4); Luminant (4); Reliant (RRI Energy) (4); Southern Company (4); AEP (3); and NRG (3).

The EIP report rates the power plants both in terms of sheer mercury pollution and mercury pollution adjusted per gigawatt-hour.

For a copy of the full EIP report, go to: http://www.environmentalintegrity.org.

The Environmental Integrity Project report ranks the top fifty power plant polluters each year for mercury emissions according to two measures: “total amount emitted,” which measures the total pounds of mercury reported by each power plant; and “emission rate,” which measures the amount of pollution per gigawatt-hour of electricity generated.

The EIP report contains mercury emissions data obtained from EPA’s Toxics Release Inventory (TRI), and electric generation data obtained from EPA’s Clean Air Markets (also known as the Acid Rain program) databases.

In 2008, the U.S. EPA’s Toxics TRI tracked mercury emissions from approximately 470 electric generating facilities across the United States and its territories. (There are hundreds of power plants that release less than 10 pounds of mercury per year that are not included in the TRI database.) This report analyzes mercury emissions reported by the electric power sector to TRI. TRI data are publicly available on EPA’s website at http://www.epa.gov/triexplorer.

All data is self-reported by the utility industry to EPA.

 

Related News

Related News

Time running out for Ontario to formally request Pickering nuclear power station extension

Pickering Nuclear Plant Extension faces CNSC approval as Ontario Power Generation pursues license renewal before…
View more

Summerland solar power project will provide electricity

Summerland Solar+Storage Project brings renewable energy to a municipal utility with photovoltaic panels and battery…
View more

BC Hydro Expects To See Electricity Usage Rise This Holiday Season

BC Hydro Holiday Electricity Usage is set to rise as energy demand increases during peak…
View more

Elizabeth May wants a fully renewable electricity grid by 2030. Is that possible?

Green Party Mission Possible 2030 outlines a rapid transition to renewable energy, electric vehicles, carbon…
View more

Advanced Reactors Will Stand On The Shoulders Of Giants

Advanced Nuclear Reactors redefine nuclear energy with SMRs, diverse fuels, passive safety, digital control rooms,…
View more

The Impact of AI on Corporate Electricity Bills

AI Energy Consumption strains corporate electricity bills as data centers and HPC workloads run nonstop,…
View more

Sign Up for Electricity Forum’s Newsletter

Stay informed with our FREE Newsletter — get the latest news, breakthrough technologies, and expert insights, delivered straight to your inbox.

Electricity Today T&D Magazine Subscribe for FREE

Stay informed with the latest T&D policies and technologies.
  • Timely insights from industry experts
  • Practical solutions T&D engineers
  • Free access to every issue

Live Online & In-person Group Training

Advantages To Instructor-Led Training – Instructor-Led Course, Customized Training, Multiple Locations, Economical, CEU Credits, Course Discounts.

Request For Quotation

Whether you would prefer Live Online or In-Person instruction, our electrical training courses can be tailored to meet your company's specific requirements and delivered to your employees in one location or at various locations.