Power agency criticizes Bush BPA plan
The council, a multistate agency charged by Congress with balancing the region's need for reliable and affordable hydropower against the needs of fish and wildlife, released a report on the issue recently.
The White House proposal, part of a draft federal budget document, would effectively limit to $4.45 billion the amount of money the Bonneville Power Administration can borrow. Bonneville is a government agency that markets power produced at 31 federal dams on the Columbia River system.
Bonneville uses loans to pay for fish and wildlife projects such as hatcheries, and for investments in the regionwide power system, including energy conservation, transmission lines and power plant construction.
"The administration's proposal would hit hard, forcing an unnecessary, unwanted competition for funding among important investments that Bonneville needs to make," said Melinda Eden, council chairwoman. "The losers would be the region's rate payers, who face the possibility of a less reliable power supply, rate increases and slower progress in protecting fish and wildlife."
As a government agency, Bonneville can't issue stock to raise money and instead relies on borrowed funds. Currently, Bonneville can borrow up to $4.45 billion from the U.S. Treasury, repaying the treasury with revenue from power generation.
Bonneville can also issue "third-party debt," where private investors act much like the government. The agency pays over time for system improvements made by investors, using money generated by leases it holds on those power or transmission investments.
There is no government-mandated cap on the third-party debt.
The Bush administration proposal would put the third-party debt under the umbrella of Treasury debt, capping Bonneville's total borrowing power at $4.45 billion.
"This change seems subtle," said the council's John Harrison, "but it would dramatically affect BPA's ability to do what it needs to do."
The power marketer, directed in large part by Congress, must sell hydropower, maintain the transmission grid, invest in fish and wildlife programs to offset the impacts of big federal dams, encourage energy conservation to limit rate increases and explore alternative and renewable energy sources.
Limiting the ability to borrow means Bonneville is faced with either reducing funding for some programs or raising rates, Harrison said. The fish and wildlife programs would probably be the first to go.
Related News

CALIFORNIA: Why your electricity prices are soaring
LOS ANGELES - California's electricity prices are among the highest in the country, new research says, and those costs are falling disproportionately on a customer base that's already struggling to pay their bills.
PG&E customers pay about 80 percent more per kilowatt-hour than the national average, according to a study by the energy institute at UC Berkeley's Haas Business School with the nonprofit think tank Next 10. The study analyzed the rates of the state's three largest investor-owned utilities and found that Southern California Edison charged 45 percent more than the national average, while San Diego Gas & Electric charged double.…