NFPA 70E Training
Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.
- Live Online
- 6 hours Instructor-led
- Group Training Available
Colorado nuclear power faces renewed attention as Tri-State and Xcel Energy weigh federal backing, small modular reactors, grid reliability, renewable energy goals, carbon-free generation, costs, and radioactive waste after Fort St. Vrain's shutdown.
Top Insights
Colorado nuclear power means weighing reactors with federal support, plus renewables, costs, and nuclear waste.
- Tri-State welcomes federal financing for future nuclear projects.
- Xcel prioritizes renewables; cautious on nuclear capital risk.
- Small modular reactors viewed as better fit than large plants.
- Fort St. Vrain closed; converted to natural gas by Xcel.
President Barack Obama is promising billions of dollars to help build the first American nuclear power plant in nearly 30 years. He says the $8 billion in loan guarantees for the two reactors in Georgia is just the start.
Colorado hasn't had a nuclear plant on line in 18 years, even as a nuclear energy revival unfolds across the country today. Major power providers have mixed reactions to the president's initiative.
In Colorado, Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association Inc. is a wholesale supplier of power. From a control room in Westminster, its 44 electric cooperatives serve primarily rural customers in several states, where coal is regaining status as energy prices rise. Tri-State's spokesman Robert McLennan welcomed the announcement by the president.
"I think it's a definite step, an historic step that indicates the administration is going to provide financial backing to the utilities to move forward with nuclear," McLennan said.
Xcel Energy is the primary power supplier to Colorado's cities and suburbs. Reacting to the president's announcement, Xcel says nuclear has to be part of any discussion about whether to expand nuclear power in Colorado, but the utility has concentrated on renewables. Xcel takes pride in the being the largest wind power provider in the U.S.
"We have to weigh the risk of the cost of building a nuclear power plant, considering the size of our company and the tremendous capital outlay that it takes to build a plant like that," Xcel Energy spokesman Tom Henley said in a prepared statement.
Tri-State sounds more enthusiastic.
"We are preserving our option to build a nuclear facility in the future," McLennan said.
Plants like the one supported by the president in Georgia are too big and expensive for Colorado's population right now. Tri-State says it makes more sense to wait for the next generation of smaller, more cost effective versions.
Nuclear power plants are expensive to build but cheap operate. There are no carbon emissions to worry about, but the big problem continues to be what to do with the radioactive waste generated by reactors.
Fort St. Vrain, Colorado's only nuclear power plant, was plagued by operating problems early on. It ran for 15 years but was shut down in 1992 and converted to natural gas, and Colorado residents later paid off the decommissioning bill for the plant. Fort St. Vrain is owned by Xcel Energy.
Related News
Related News
USAID Delivers Mobile Gas Turbine Power Plant to Ukraine
BC Ferries celebrates addition of hybrid ships
Trump Is Seen Replacing Obama’s Power Plant Overhaul With a Tune-Up
27,000 Plus More Clean Energy Jobs Lost in May
Alliant aims for carbon-neutral electricity, says plans will save billions for ratepayers
How Alberta’s lithium-laced oil fields can fuel the electric vehicle revolution
Sign Up for Electricity Forum’s Newsletter
Stay informed with our FREE Newsletter — get the latest news, breakthrough technologies, and expert insights, delivered straight to your inbox.
Electricity Today T&D Magazine Subscribe for FREE
- Timely insights from industry experts
- Practical solutions T&D engineers
- Free access to every issue