Colorado providers would welcome nuclear power

Colorado hasn't had a nuclear plant on line in 18 years. Major power providers have mixed reactions to the president's initiative.

In Colorado, Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association Inc. is a wholesale supplier of power. From a control room in Westminster, its 44 electric cooperatives serve primarily rural customers in several states. Tri-State's spokesman Robert McLennan welcomed the announcement by the president.

"I think it's a definite step, an historic step that indicates the administration is going to provide financial backing to the utilities to move forward with nuclear," McLennan said.

Xcel Energy is the primary power supplier to Colorado's cities and suburbs. Reacting to the president's announcement, Xcel says nuclear has to be part of any discussion about meeting future power needs in Colorado, but the utility has concentrated on renewables. Xcel takes pride in the being the largest wind power provider in the U.S.

"We have to weigh the risk of the cost of building a nuclear power plant, considering the size of our company and the tremendous capital outlay that it takes to build a plant like that," Xcel Energy spokesman Tom Henley said in a prepared statement.

Tri-State sounds more enthusiastic.

"We are preserving our option to build a nuclear facility in the future," McLennan said.

Plants like the one supported by the president in Georgia are too big and expensive for Colorado's population right now. Tri-State says it makes more sense to wait for the next generation of smaller, more cost effective versions.

Nuclear power plants are expensive to build but cheap operate. There are no carbon emissions to worry about, but the big problem continues to be what to do with the radioactive waste.

Fort St. Vrain, Colorado's only nuclear power plant, was plagued by operating problems early on. It ran for 15 years but was shut down in 1992 and converted to natural gas. Fort St. Vrain is owned by Xcel Energy.