Ontario May Feel Cash Squeeze


Substation Relay Protection Training

Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.

  • Live Online
  • 12 hours Instructor-led
  • Group Training Available
Regular Price:
$699
Coupon Price:
$599
Reserve Your Seat Today
The decision to scrap plans to sell a minority stake in the Hydro One power transmission grid means the province will have a tough time balancing its books and will further tarnish the governmental image among investors, analysts said.

The sale of a 49 per cent interest in Hydro One, which was to be completed in the first quarter of this year, was expected to add about CAN$2 billion to the coffers of Canada's most populous province.

Ontario Superior Court last spring quashed the province's plans to sell all of Hydro One in what would have been Canada's biggest initial public offering. After the court ruling, the Conservative government said it would sell a minority stake in the company, which transmits 90 per cent of the province's electricity.

"A two billion dollar hole, or whatever the number is, will result in some tough challenges...I don't think the economy is doing two billion dollars better than the last time," said Derek Burleton, a senior economist at Toronto-Dominion Bank.

Electric deregulation, the brainchild of Ontario Premier Ernie Eves's predecessor, Mike Harris, was expected to bring much needed investment in Ontario power plants and reduce the C$38 billion debt accumulated by the old Ontario Hydro.

But Ontario's California-style deregulation led to prices soaring more than 25 percent after the market opened on May 1, causing Eves to freeze electricity rates and offer rebates to angry consumers.

Freezing rates until May 2006 fizzled prospects of any private investment in power plants in Ontario, which suffers from power shortages during peak periods, and also dashed hopes about investor interest in a minority stake in Hydro One.

Critics said dwindling investor interest and an upcoming provincial election have led Eves to keep Hydro One in public hands as he tries to garner support.

Ontario New Democratic Party Leader Howard Hampton said Eves's move was an "election dodge", adding that the Conservatives may change their mind on Hydro One yet again if they win the next election, expected as early as this spring.

BILLION DOLLAR FUND

The province has set aside $1 billion in a contingency fund and could get some additional federal money for health-care expenses, which would free up some cash to cover the $2 billion shortfall.

But analysts say the hole -- about three per cent of fiscal 2001's $64.3 billion in provincial revenue -- is big enough to create problems.

"In December (the government) indicated that it was going to sell assets of about $2 billion and that would be required to balance the books," said Gerry Phillips, a finance critic for Ontario's Liberal Party.

"Theoretically, they are going to have to find that money elsewhere and I think they will proceed to sell other assets... It takes away most of their fiscal flexibility and sends a signal to the financial community of a government that is a bit rudderless."

Eves said on Monday his government would still balance its books.

Ontario Finance Minister Janet Ecker said in early December that the province, Canada's main financial and industrial engine, was showing some of the strongest economic growth in the developed world. She upped the province's economic growth forecast to 3.5 per cent from 3.2 per cent for fiscal 2002, ending in March.

Ecker added that while Ontario's growth in fiscal 2003 will be strong, the pace of growth will slow a little from fiscal 2002.

Some analysts pointed to the long-term adverse effects from the government's electricity privatization plan.

"The present situation with electricity is not sustainable," said Jan Carr, an electricity consultant with Baker, Dunn & Rossi in Toronto.

"We're using electricity today which we have to pay for tomorrow. The whole reason we needed to (privatize) was that we had accumulated a C$38 billion debt and restructuring was intended to get us out of that hole, not dig the hole bigger," Carr said.

Bruce Sharp, senior consultant at Aegent Energy Advisors, said rebates and price freezes will cost the government nearly C$1.46 billion by April 2003, or about C$300 million more than had been estimated for the first year of deregulation to help customers pay their bills if prices skyrocketed.

Related News

Duke Energy Florida to build its largest battery storage projects yet

Duke Energy Florida battery storage will add 22 MW across Trenton, Cape San Blas and…
View more

How the 787 uses electricity to maximise efficiency

Boeing 787 More-Electric Architecture replaces pneumatics with bleedless pressurization, VFSG starter-generators, electric brakes, and heated…
View more

Alberta set to retire coal power by 2023, ahead of 2030 provincial deadline

Alberta coal phaseout accelerates as utilities convert to natural gas, cutting emissions under TIER regulations…
View more

Germany's Energy Crisis Deepens as Local Utilities Cry for Help

Germany energy liquidity crisis is straining municipal utilities as gas and power prices surge, margin…
View more

Soaring Electricity And Coal Use Are Proving Once Again, Roger Pielke Jr's "Iron Law Of Climate"

Global Electricity Demand Surge underscores rising coal generation, lagging renewables deployment, and escalating emissions, as…
View more

Potent greenhouse gas declines in the US, confirming success of control efforts

US SF6 Emissions Decline as NOAA analysis and EPA mitigation show progress, with atmospheric measurements…
View more

Sign Up for Electricity Forum’s Newsletter

Stay informed with our FREE Newsletter — get the latest news, breakthrough technologies, and expert insights, delivered straight to your inbox.

Electricity Today T&D Magazine Subscribe for FREE

Stay informed with the latest T&D policies and technologies.
  • Timely insights from industry experts
  • Practical solutions T&D engineers
  • Free access to every issue

Live Online & In-person Group Training

Advantages To Instructor-Led Training – Instructor-Led Course, Customized Training, Multiple Locations, Economical, CEU Credits, Course Discounts.

Request For Quotation

Whether you would prefer Live Online or In-Person instruction, our electrical training courses can be tailored to meet your company's specific requirements and delivered to your employees in one location or at various locations.