Kansas wind power links not standard

Kansas Interconnection Standards face utility-by-utility rules as KCC staff rejects uniform grid access, complicating renewable energy, net metering, distributed generation, and wind power adoption for businesses, communities, and schools across the state.

Just how serious is Kansas about promoting wind energy?

Kansas has the second-best wind potential in the country, but advocates are increasingly concerned that the state is blowing a key reform that would make it easier for individuals, businesses and communities to produce wind power.

Over the years, a hodgepodge of requirements imposed by utilities has made hooking renewable-energy equipment, such as wind turbines, to the electric grid more difficult and expensive. States interested in boosting renewables have been replacing the mishmash with a simpler, easy-to-understand interconnection standard.

That appeared to be where Kansas was headed in a compromise overseen last year by Gov. Mark Parkinson, after a transmission lines deal was announced. The plan included approval of a coal-fired power plant but also provisions to promote renewable energy, including making it easier to connect to the electric grid.

But many of the details were left for utility regulators to figure out later. And the Kansas Corporation Commission's staff has recommended leaving things up to each utility, rather than a uniform interconnection standard, prompting influence questions from consumer advocates.

Although some thought Kansas City Power & Light supported the uniform standards, the utility says it agrees with the staff as it navigates a coal and wind mix statewide.

The staff recommendation was an unwelcome surprise to advocates.

"We're really taken aback," said Maril Hazlett, associate director of the Climate and Energy Project, a group based in Lawrence that promotes sustainable energy.

The dispute comes as Kansas struggles to regain traction in wind energy, even as lawmakers revisit coal plants in the legislature. Although it has more potential wind energy than any state except Texas, Kansas fell from 11th to 14th in a recent ranking of the states' actual installed wind-generating capacity.

In contrast, Iowa — with far less potential than Kansas — is No. 2 in installed wind power. It is adopting interconnection standards and has aggressive requirements for how much renewable energy has to be produced in the state.

The amount of wind energy that could be produced by independent operators such as businesses and towns is small compared with utility-scale wind farms, but some states such as Minnesota are encouraging more of it.

The KCC will have a hearing about interconnection this month, while key lawmakers remain upset over a power line dispute in the region.

There has already been some fallout, with at least one company saying it has shelved plans for Kansas because of the mixed signals from regulators.

NexGen Energy, a Colorado company that installs wind turbines and then sells the power to such entities as towns and schools, said it intended to do business in Kansas but decided to concentrate on markets that already have better interconnection rules, such as Ohio.

"We'd like to be working in Kansas. It's just a shame," said Ted Rose, a vice president for NexGen.

Parkinson's office declined to comment on the staff recommendation and deferred to the KCC after the power plant decision raised concerns, which did not respond to a telephone message.

Before the filing that revealed the staff's position, most interested parties thought there was general agreement to adopt the model standards — especially because Kansas passed the Net Metering and Easy Connect Act last year and because of the federal 1978 law shaping utility obligations.

Jim Ludwig, an executive vice president for Westar Energy, the state's largest electric utility, said Westar didn't object to being under uniform standards.

But KCP&L, the second-largest utility in the state, said recently that it did object.

"We believe system requirements are best decided at the utility level," said Katie McDonald, a KCP&L spokeswoman.

The utility said it needed flexibility, such as being able to require different equipment that could be needed for rural and urban connections.

Related News

• Electricity Forum News

• Energy Policy News