Power facility proposal revealed

subscribe

City officials plan to pay $18 million for more than 600 acres just north of Air Force Plant 42 for a future power plant.

Palmdale is planning to acquire the 615-acre site, on Avenue M near Sierra Highway, from Lockheed Martin. The Lockheed property is just north of the aerospace companies at Air Force Plant 42 and Lockheed Martin's Plant 10, which the city envisions as the major users of the power from the plant.

"We are on the fast track for a power plant in Palmdale," Councilman Steve Knight said.

The City Council will decide whether to fund the land acquisition through the sale of Certificates of Participation. The city's debt service would be $1.5 million a year.

City officials expect to either refinance or have the certificates paid by the time construction begins on the power plant, which could occur in 18 months to three years.

The plant will take up roughly half of the site. The rest of the property could be sold for development.

Lockheed Martin originally planned a business park on the land but that never materialized.

City officials are working with a consultant, Inland Energy Inc., to secure permits to build a 500-megawatt power plant that they say would provide the city with reliable, more affordable energy. It is expected to take about two years and cost as much as $5.5 million to secure those permits. The city plans to seek permits for a plant that would operate two 165-megawatt gas-fired turbines and a steam turbine capable of generating 170 megawatts. The plant would be capable of providing energy for a city of 400,000 people.

The plant would also have a solar-power farm capable of generating 50 megawatts of power.

Related News

should-california-fund-biofuels-or-electric-vehicles

Should California Fund Biofuels or Electric Vehicles?

CALIFORNIA - California is at the forefront of the transition to a greener economy, driven by its ambitious goals to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and combat climate change. As part of its strategy, the state is grappling with the question of whether it should subsidize out-of-state biofuels or in-state electric vehicles (EVs) to meet these goals. Both options come with their own sets of benefits and challenges, and the decision carries significant implications for the state’s environmental, economic, and energy landscapes.

The Case for Biofuels

Biofuels have long been promoted as a cleaner alternative to traditional fossil fuels like gasoline…

READ MORE
Europe is producing all-time highs of wind and solar energy

Europeans push back from Russian oil and gas

READ MORE

yukon nuclear

Modular nuclear reactors a 'long shot' worth studying, says Yukon gov't

READ MORE

electric car

Gas-electric hybrid vehicles get a boost in the US from Ford, others

READ MORE

UK in a Changing Europe

Opinion: UK Natural Gas, Rising Prices and Electricity

READ MORE