Court blocks plan to curb mountaintop mining


Protective Relay Training - Basic

Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.

  • Live Online
  • 12 hours Instructor-led
  • Group Training Available
Regular Price:
$699
Coupon Price:
$599
Reserve Your Seat Today

Stream Buffer Rule Court Ruling affirms administrative law, requiring notice-and-comment before repeal; impacts Interior Department efforts on mountaintop mining, coal operations, and environmental regulation across Appalachia, safeguarding stream protections and transparent governance.

 

What's Going On

D.C. court held Interior must use notice-and-comment to repeal the stream buffer rule, ensuring a lawful process.

  • Court rejects Interior's request to vacate rule
  • Notice-and-comment required for repeal actions
  • Stream protections remain pending formal rulemaking
  • Interior reviews decision; aims to improve mining

 

A U.S. court blocked an attempt by the Obama administration to overturn a Bush administration rule that made it easier for coal mining companies to dump mountaintop debris into valley streams.

 

The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia said that the Interior Department's request to vacate the regulation would have allowed the federal government to wrongfully bypass "established statutory procedures for repealing an agency rule."

Federal agencies have to follow certain procedures, including collecting public comments, before repealing government regulations, the ruling said.

Raising environmental concerns, Interior Secretary Ken Salazar called on the courts in April to withdraw the rule that allowed coal mine operators to dispose of excess mountaintop debris, amid debates over the EPA easing of debris rules, in and within 100 feet of nearby streams whenever alternative options are deemed "not reasonably possible."

The Bush regulation, alongside efforts to expand coalbed methane projects, replaced a 1983 rule that allowed dumping within 100 feet of a stream if it would not "adversely affect the water quantity or quality or other environmental resources of the stream."

Interior spokeswoman Kendra Barkoff said the department is examining the court's decision as the EPA may reverse Bush emission limits on carbon emissions.

"This administration has shown it is determined to improve mining practices and we will do so within the context of the court's ruling, which we are reviewing," Barkoff said.

The National Mining Association applauded the ruling.

"The court has preserved an open and transparent regulatory process that provides for notice and protects the rights of all interested parties to comment," association president Hal Quinn said in a statement.

More than half of U.S. electricity is generated from coal, though recent EPA decisions signaling trouble for coal have raised questions about future capacity in several regions. U.S. surface coal mining is mostly done in the steep mountains of Appalachia, across Virginia, West Virginia, Tennessee and Kentucky and accounts for about 10 percent of U.S. coal production.

Major energy companies, such as Arch Coal Inc and Consol Energy, participate in mountaintop mining, where EPA delays on mountaintop mining permits have periodically slowed projects, which involves scraping the surface of mountains and pushing the crumbled mountaintop debris into adjoining valleys.

 

Related News

Related News

U.S. Senate Looks to Modernize Renewable Energy on Public Land

PLREDA 2019 advances solar, wind, and geothermal on public lands, guiding DOI siting, improving transmission…
View more

Hydro-Quebec shocks cottage owner with $5,300 in retroactive charges

Hydro-Quebec back-billing arises from analogue meter errors and estimated consumption, leading to arrears for electricity…
View more

California scorns fossil fuel but can't keep the lights on without it

California fossil fuel grid reliability plan addresses heat wave demand, rolling blackouts, and grid stability…
View more

New energy projects seek to lower electricity costs in Southeast Alaska

Southeast Alaska Energy Projects advance hydroelectric, biomass, and heat pumps, displacing diesel via grants. Inside…
View more

India's Solar Growth Slows with Surge in Coal Generation

India Solar Slowdown and Coal Surge highlights policy uncertainty, grid stability concerns, financing gaps, and…
View more

Hydro One and Alectra announce major investments to strengthen electricity infrastructure and improve local reliability in the Hamilton area

Hydro One and Alectra Hamilton Grid Upgrades will modernize electricity infrastructure with new transformers, protection…
View more

Sign Up for Electricity Forum’s Newsletter

Stay informed with our FREE Newsletter — get the latest news, breakthrough technologies, and expert insights, delivered straight to your inbox.

Electricity Today T&D Magazine Subscribe for FREE

Stay informed with the latest T&D policies and technologies.
  • Timely insights from industry experts
  • Practical solutions T&D engineers
  • Free access to every issue

Live Online & In-person Group Training

Advantages To Instructor-Led Training – Instructor-Led Course, Customized Training, Multiple Locations, Economical, CEU Credits, Course Discounts.

Request For Quotation

Whether you would prefer Live Online or In-Person instruction, our electrical training courses can be tailored to meet your company's specific requirements and delivered to your employees in one location or at various locations.