Wind turbines making us sick: protesters


High Voltage Maintenance Training Online

Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.

  • Live Online
  • 12 hours Instructor-led
  • Group Training Available
Regular Price:
$599
Coupon Price:
$499
Reserve Your Seat Today

Ontario wind turbine health concerns spur protests at Queen's Park, citing low-frequency noise, setbacks, environmental health, sleep disruption, hypertension, municipal planning, regulation, research, and a moratorium debate under the Green Energy Act.

 

Context and Background

Reported effects near turbines include low-frequency noise, sleep loss, and hypertension; scientific evidence is mixed.

  • Protest at Queen's Park over turbines near homes
  • Claims of low-frequency noise and sleep disruption
  • 106 residents report symptoms including hypertension
  • PCs seek moratorium pending health studies

 

The Liberal government has shot down an opposition motion to place an immediate moratorium on wind turbines until their health effects are further studied.

 

Nearly 250 people descended on Queen’s Park to protest the presence of the turbines near residential areas. They claim the turbines cause low-frequency noise and have sickened nearly 106 Ontario residents, causing a variety of health ailments ranging from hypertension to sleeplessness and nosebleeds in children.

People are suffering and their concerns are being dismissed, Dr. Robert McMurtry told the protesters.

“I see their lack of energy and things they are feeling,” the London-area surgeon said. “But the thing I can’t tolerate… is the steadfast denial of the complaints.”

The Progressive Conservatives brought forward a motion calling for an immediate moratorium on the turbines until health studies are completed. The motion was defeated by the majority Liberals.

A moratorium is unnecessary, Premier Dalton McGuinty said, citing experience elsewhere. “Wind turbines have been up and running for decades in dozens, if not hundreds, of jurisdictions,” he told reporters. “We are relatively late coming to electricity generation by means of wind power.”

Ontario has some of the most rigorous standards in North America in terms of wind power and the province is funding a university research chair to study the long-term effects of the turbines, he added.

The world needs to figure out new ways of generating clean energy, the premier said, urging Ontario to stick to wind power as part of that effort.

“There are no real easy decisions in all this. We’ve decided it would be a good thing to get rid of coal. It makes our kids sick and contributes to global warming,” he said.

During Question Period, PC MPP Joyce Savoline Burlington asked the premier why people are blocked from having a say in the placement of industrial wind farms, even after security at wind farm meetings drew criticism, but are allowed to voice opinions on where shopping malls are built.

“Why does the premier think Dalton knows best when it comes to putting large industrial wind turbines in place?” she asked.

Energy Minister Brad Duguid said there is “plenty of room for consultation” at public meetings on the projects and that municipalities are involved in the decision making.

On the front steps of the Legislature, protesters accused the Liberals of fast-tracking renewable energy projects in the name of the Green Energy Act – legislation passed last May to bolster the green economy. They say the province has bypassed planning powers of municipalities.

“There appears to be significant scientific uncertainty of how close you can have industrial turbines to where people live,” said Eric Gillespie, an environmental lawyer. He is representing Ian Hanna, a citizen whose application for judicial review of the Green Energy Act as it applies to wind turbines will be heard in September.

Currently, the turbines must be set back 550 metres from homes but Gillespie said to be safe it should be nearly 2 kilometres. “If you are going to have industrial turbines, you need to cite them in locations you can say with some degree of certainty, are safe.”

 

Related News

Related News

Britain got its cleanest electricity ever during lockdown

UK Clean Electricity Record as wind, solar, and biomass boost renewable energy output, slashing carbon…
View more

Bruce nuclear reactor taken offline as $2.1B project 'officially' begins

Bruce Power Unit 6 refurbishment replaces major reactor components, shifting supply to hydroelectric and natural…
View more

New York State Moratorium on Utility Disconnections During Emergencies

New York Utility Disconnection Ban protects residents during state emergencies, covering electric, gas, water, telecommunications,…
View more

Quebec's electricity ambitions reopen old wounds in Newfoundland and Labrador

Quebec Churchill Falls power deal renewal spotlights Hydro-Que9bec's Labrador hydroelectricity, Churchill River contract extension, Gull…
View more

The UK’s energy plan is all very well but it ignores the forecast rise in global sea-levels

UK Marine Energy and Climate Resilience can counter sea level rise and storm surge with…
View more

UK electricity and gas networks making ‘unjustified’ profits

UK Energy Network Profits are under scrutiny as Ofgem price controls, Citizens Advice claims, and…
View more

Sign Up for Electricity Forum’s Newsletter

Stay informed with our FREE Newsletter — get the latest news, breakthrough technologies, and expert insights, delivered straight to your inbox.

Electricity Today T&D Magazine Subscribe for FREE

Stay informed with the latest T&D policies and technologies.
  • Timely insights from industry experts
  • Practical solutions T&D engineers
  • Free access to every issue

Download the 2026 Electrical Training Catalog

Explore 50+ live, expert-led electrical training courses –

  • Interactive
  • Flexible
  • CEU-cerified