Substation Relay Protection Training

Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.

  • Live Online
  • 12 hours Instructor-led
  • Group Training Available
Regular Price:
$699
Coupon Price:
$599
Reserve Your Seat Today
-- The Snohomish County Public Utility District (PUD) today filed suit against a group of the nation's largest electric power companies, striking out against the allegedly artificial high prices that forced large and unpredictable rate increases on customers.

The PUD serves 270,000 residential and commercial customers north of Seattle, Washington. This is the first suit in which a Washington state public utility district has sued power generating and marketing companies.

According to the PUD, the suit attempts to right some of the wrongs inflicted on consumers during the recent power crisis in the Western U.S.

"We were forced to impose some very significant rate increases on our customers, many of whom are seniors and working families, now struggling just to keep their lights on," said Don Berkey, president of the PUD Board of Commissioners. "We're learning more every day about how Enron and other power marketers manipulated the energy market, so we're asking the court to step in to force these companies to own up to their actions and refund these wrongfully obtained windfalls."

Filed in California District Court by attorney Steve Berman of the Seattle-based law firm Hagens Berman, the suit claims that the power companies conspired to drive up electric prices by creating artificial shortages during last year's power crisis and reaped billions of dollars in unjust profits as a result.

"Our mandate was to provide power to customers at a fair price," said PUD General Counsel Michael Gianunzio. "We intend to prove that these power traders created a wildly cynical scam that drove prices through the roof while cashing in on short-term profits. Snohomish County PUD did everything it could to provide low cost, reliable service for its customers, but found itself in a chaotic market manipulated by the defendants."

Gianunzio added that "These energy traders used many strategies to game the Western energy market, including strategies from Enron with colorful names such as 'Get Shorty' or 'Death Star'. The 'Get Shorty ' strategy involved traders submitting false information in the energy grid to their financial advantage."

The defendants include Williams Electric Marketing (NYSE:WMB), Mirant Corporation (NYSE:MIR), Reliant Energy Services (NYSE:REI), Duke Energy Trading (NYSE:DUK), Dynegy Power Marketing (NYSE:DYN) and Sempra Energy Resources (NYSE:SRE).

According to the complaint, the residents of Snohomish County saw their electricity rates increase by approximately 60 percent as a result of the alleged price inflation.

The complaint states that before the Western energy crisis, wholesale prices for electricity in the Pacific Northwest averaged about $24 per megawatt hour (MWh). During late 2000 and early 2001, wholesale prices ballooned to $500 per MWh, with prices on the spot market recorded as high as $3300 per MWh.

Berman, a nationally recognized expert in class action litigation, states that the skyrocketing energy prices cornered the PUD, forcing it to balance the needs of understandably upset customers and the financial well being of the not-for-profit public utility. "Snohomish PUD found itself squarely in the middle of an economic and political storm," Berman said.

The suit claims that in addition to withholding power in the longer-term markets to drive up prices in the short-term markets, the power companies conspired to set prices, and held those prices by monitoring one another's trading practices. It also alleges the defendants engaged in a series of electric trades designed to artificially inflate electric prices.

The suit claims the defendants committed violations of California antitrust laws, committed unlawful and fraudulent business acts or practices, and violated California's business and professions code.

Related News

National Steel Car appealing decision in legal challenge of Ontario electricity fee it calls an unconstitutional tax

Ontario Global Adjustment Appeal spotlights Ontario's electricity fee, regulatory charge vs tax debate, FIT contracts,…
View more

Tesla reduces Solar + home battery pricing following California blackouts

Tesla Solar and Powerwall Discount offers a ~10% installation price cut amid PG&E blackouts, helping…
View more

Ottawa hands N.L. $5.2 billion for troubled Muskrat Falls hydro project

Muskrat Falls funding deal delivers federal relief to Newfoundland and Labrador: Justin Trudeau outlines loan…
View more

IEA praises Modi govt for taking electricity to every village; calls India 'star performer'

India Village Electrification hailed by the IEA in World Energy Outlook 2018 showcases rapid energy…
View more

Pandemic has already cost Hydro-Québec $130 million, CEO says

Hydro-Que9bec 2020 Profit Outlook faces COVID-19 headwinds as revenue drops, U.S. Northeast export demand weakens,…
View more

OPINION Rewiring Indian electricity

India Power Sector Crisis: a tangled market of underused plants, coal shortages, cross-subsidies, high transmission…
View more

Sign Up for Electricity Forum’s Newsletter

Stay informed with our FREE Newsletter — get the latest news, breakthrough technologies, and expert insights, delivered straight to your inbox.

Electricity Today T&D Magazine Subscribe for FREE

Stay informed with the latest T&D policies and technologies.
  • Timely insights from industry experts
  • Practical solutions T&D engineers
  • Free access to every issue

Download the 2026 Electrical Training Catalog

Explore 50+ live, expert-led electrical training courses –

  • Interactive
  • Flexible
  • CEU-cerified