Reid calls for solar plant at site of closed station


NFPA 70E Training

Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.

  • Live Online
  • 6 hours Instructor-led
  • Group Training Available
Regular Price:
$199
Coupon Price:
$149
Reserve Your Seat Today
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid called on the majority owner of the closed Mohave Generating Station in Laughlin to use the site for a solar power plant.

The 1,580-megawatt, coal-fired power plant was closed at the end of 2005 because the owners were unable to reach agreements on coal and water and, consequently, did not want to build air pollution control equipment required under an agreed court order.

"When the plant closed down, the local communities and Native American tribes lost valuable jobs," Reid said in a statement. "I am urging Southern California Edison to convert the plant and its assets into a vibrant solar power producer to give the area an economic boost."

In his letter to Southern California Edison President, Reid noted that the plant owners get $40 million yearly from selling sulfur dioxide credits to other industrial plants.

Industrial plants can sell sulfur dioxide credits, rather than continue to operate and spew out pollution. Reid suggested Edison and the other owners use that money to build a solar power plant. An Edison spokesman had no comment. Edison operated and owns 56 percent of Mohave. Nevada Power Co. owns 14 percent and the balance belongs to the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power and the Salt River Project in Arizona.

Roberto Denis, senior vice president of Nevada Power parent Sierra Pacific Resources, said Reid's idea was good but not new. Nevada Power has discussed using the site for a solar power plant or a gas-fired power plant, Denis said.

The quantity of gas, however, is limited and a solar power project would replace only a fraction of the power that the coal plant generated. Denis recalled that Nevada Power opposed plans to try to reopen Mohave as a coal plant because it would not be as clean as new coal-fired plants even after building air pollution reduction equipment.

"We did not want to invest billions of dollars in a plant that would continue to be a polluter," Denis said.

Related News

Four Facts about Covid and U.S. Electricity Consumption

COVID-19 Impact on U.S. Electricity Consumption shows commercial and industrial demand dropped as residential use…
View more

Iran, Iraq Discuss Further Cooperation in Energy Sector

Iran-Iraq Electricity Cooperation advances with power grid synchronization, cross-border energy trade, 400-kV transmission lines, and…
View more

Here are 3 ways to find out where your electricity comes from

US energy mix shows how the electric grid blends renewables, fossil fuels, nuclear, and hydro,…
View more

FERC needs to review capacity market performance, GAO recommends

FERC Capacity Markets face scrutiny as GAO flags inconsistent data on resource adequacy and costs,…
View more

Tracking Progress on 100% Clean Energy Targets

100% Clean Energy Targets drive renewable electricity, decarbonization, and cost savings through state policies, CCAs,…
View more

Experts Question Quebec's Push for EV Dominance

Quebec EV transition plan aims for 2 million electric vehicles by 2030 and bans new…
View more

Sign Up for Electricity Forum’s Newsletter

Stay informed with our FREE Newsletter — get the latest news, breakthrough technologies, and expert insights, delivered straight to your inbox.

Electricity Today T&D Magazine Subscribe for FREE

Stay informed with the latest T&D policies and technologies.
  • Timely insights from industry experts
  • Practical solutions T&D engineers
  • Free access to every issue

Download the 2026 Electrical Training Catalog

Explore 50+ live, expert-led electrical training courses –

  • Interactive
  • Flexible
  • CEU-cerified