Environmentalists target Wyoming coal expansions


Protective Relay Training - Basic

Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.

  • Live Online
  • 12 hours Instructor-led
  • Group Training Available
Regular Price:
$699
Coupon Price:
$599
Reserve Your Seat Today

Powder River Basin Coal Mine Expansions face BLM review in Wyoming, with public comments on climate change, carbon dioxide from power plants, and operators Arch Coal, Peabody Energy, and Rio Tinto under scrutiny.

 

Key Information

Proposed leases adding 22,000 acres to mine 2.4B tons in 10 years, assessed by BLM amid climate and emissions concerns.

  • BLM draft and final EIS evaluate mine lease tracts
  • 22,000 acres proposed, 2.4B tons over a decade
  • 14% of US CO2 tied to Wyoming coal combustion
  • WildEarth Guardians mobilizes public comment

 

An environmental group has been urging people to oppose the proposed expansion of three Wyoming coal mines on grounds that coal is a primary source of greenhouse gas emissions.

 

WildEarth Guardians, based in Santa Fe, New Mexico, has set up a Web page to encourage people to e-mail comments to the U.S. Bureau of Land Management on proposals to expand three coal mines in the Powder River Basin: St. Louis-based Arch Coal's Black Thunder Mine, Gillette-based Rio Tinto's Jacob Ranch Mine and St. Louis-based Peabody Energy's North Antelope Rochelle Mine.

Wyoming produces far more coal than any other state — nearly three times as much each year as the second-ranked coal state, West Virginia. Virtually all of the coal is burned in power plants and scientists say such plants contribute to climate change by releasing carbon dioxide, prompting some energy firms to embrace emissions cuts in response.

"Clearly the coal mines aren't going to go away tomorrow and coal's going to be here," Jeremy Nichols of WildEarth Guardians said. "But we need to start charting a path for a clean energy future."

Nearly 14 percent of U.S. carbon dioxide emissions originates from coal that is mined from Wyoming's Powder River Basin and burned in power plants, according to a recent estimate by the BLM in Wyoming.

That makes Wyoming "ground zero" for greenhouse emissions, Nichols said.

"Global warming threatens the wildlife, wild places, and wild rivers of the American West. It's time to shift away from coal. It's time for the Bureau of Land Management to be a leader in safeguarding the climate," reads part of the group's suggested comments to the BLM.

The proposed expansions would open up nearly 22,000 acres to strip mining to unearth an estimated 2.4 billion tons of coal over about 10 years, even as some advocate moves to replace coal with natural gas to cut emissions, according to the BLM.

Spokespeople for two of three companies — Greg Schaefer with Arch Coal and Heidi Lowe with Rio Tinto Energy — did not respond to requests for comment on the group's effort. Beth Sutton, spokeswoman for St. Louis-based Peabody Coal, declined to comment.

Environmentalists in recent years have opposed coal-fired power plants, as seen in the Utah coal plant fight coverage across the region, because of the plants' greenhouse emissions. Opposing coal mining in Wyoming because of climate change is new, said Nichols.

"We're trying to leverage this issue in a way that's never been done before," he said.

Also new — within the past year or so — is the BLM's estimate that about 14 percent of the nation's carbon dioxide emissions comes from burning Wyoming coal, as coal's warming concern gains attention, said Mike Karbs, assistant district manager for solid minerals in the BLM's Wyoming High Plains District.

"Nobody really knows if and how much that would change the climate," Karbs added, echoing calls for more research on coal from scientists.

Like all mines, Wyoming's coal mines need to expand to remain productive, amid coal burning more than ever in recent years. The emissions estimate is contained in a draft environmental study of the proposed additional coal mining.

A 60-day public comment period on the document has already ended. The BLM had received between 300 and 400 e-mail comments on the study, Karbs said.

He said he wasn't sure yet how many comments originated the WildEarth Guardians e-mail form.

Separately, the BLM recently issued a final environmental impact statement covering the proposed expansion of four other mines in the Powder River Basin, as federal support for clean coal projects has also continued in parallel. The proposed expansion of those mines would open up 8,800 acres to strip-mine an estimated 833 million tons of coal.

 

Related News

Related News

A New Electric Boat Club Launches in Seattle

Aurelia Boat Club delivers electric boat membership in Seattle, featuring zero-emission propulsion, quiet cruising, sustainable…
View more

COVID-19 Pandemic Puts $35 Billion in Wind Energy Investments at Risk, Says Industry Group

COVID-19 Impact on U.S. Wind Industry: disrupting wind power projects, tax credits, and construction timelines,…
View more

The nuclear power dispute driving a wedge between France and Germany

Franco-German Nuclear Power Divide shapes EU energy policy, electricity market reform, and decarbonization strategies, as…
View more

Report call for major changes to operation of Nova Scotia's power grid

Nova Scotia Energy Modernization Act proposes an independent system operator, focused energy regulation, coal phase-out…
View more

Quebec authorizes nearly 1,000 megawatts of electricity for 11 industrial projects

Quebec Large-Scale Power Connections allocate 956 MW via Hydro-Québec to battery, bioenergy, and green hydrogen…
View more

BC Hydro to begin reporting COVID-19 updates at Site C

BC Hydro COVID-19 Site C updates detail monitoring, self-isolation at the work camp, Northern Health…
View more

Sign Up for Electricity Forum’s Newsletter

Stay informed with our FREE Newsletter — get the latest news, breakthrough technologies, and expert insights, delivered straight to your inbox.

Electricity Today T&D Magazine Subscribe for FREE

Stay informed with the latest T&D policies and technologies.
  • Timely insights from industry experts
  • Practical solutions T&D engineers
  • Free access to every issue

Live Online & In-person Group Training

Advantages To Instructor-Led Training – Instructor-Led Course, Customized Training, Multiple Locations, Economical, CEU Credits, Course Discounts.

Request For Quotation

Whether you would prefer Live Online or In-Person instruction, our electrical training courses can be tailored to meet your company's specific requirements and delivered to your employees in one location or at various locations.