Google defends power usage

- The debate over whether the Internet is a power hog or a tool that can deliver energy savings (for example, e-commerce reduces car trips to the store) rages on.

Not even experts who crunch the numbers on these issues, like Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory project scientist Jonathan Koomey, can say for sure if the Internet is carbon neutral or not — it’s really complicated, Koomey explained to me back in March.

Well, Google really doesn’t like being deemed — fairly or unfairly — an energy glutton, as a press report earlier this year claimed. And the search engine giant has been working on its self-defense moves in that area.

On Google’s blog, the company’s senior vice president of operations, Urs Hölzle, compares the energy expended for a typical Google search to other actions, like publishing a daily newspaper, producing a glass of orange juice, making a cheeseburger or driving 5 miles in an average car.

Of course, the energy consumption of Google searches pales in comparison to these physical actions: It takes 850 Google searches to make a newspaper and 15,000 Google searches for a cheeseburger. (More than anything, that emphasizes how unsustainable the meat industry is, but thatÂ’s another article.)

Even more impressive is the fact that, according to Hölzle, “[I]n the time it takes to do a Google search, your own personal computer will likely use more energy than we will use to answer your query.”

Given all this Internet energy research is so new and Internet infrastructure is expanding at a rapid pace, itÂ’s hard to use these figures to answer whether or not the power the Internet uses makes up for itself in energy savings through web services. A study by the Climate Group says it does, but until we know more, itÂ’s the investigation process thatÂ’s the most important part.

Last month I posted the (slightly cheeky) story ‘Carbon Footprint of Spam: Hello, the Internet Uses Energy’ in response to a study sponsored by computer security firm McAfee on the energy consumption of spam. The lead author of the report, Cody Taylor, wrote to me to say: “spam is obviously not the biggest culprit around when it comes to environmental harm. But I think studies like this are useful in expanding our understanding of ICT [information and communications technology] so we can make better decisions.”

I completely agree and, clearly, so does Google — keep on crunching the numbers.

Related News

new-era-for-churchill-falls

A New Era for Churchill Falls: Newfoundland and Labrador Secures Billions in Landmark Deal with Quebec

QUEBEC - St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador - In a historic development, Newfoundland and Labrador (NL) and Quebec have reached a tentative agreement over the controversial Churchill Falls hydroelectric project, potentially unlocking hundreds of billions of dollars for the Atlantic province. The deal, announced jointly by Premier Andrew Furey and Quebec Premier François Legault, aims to rectify the decades-long imbalance in the original 1969 contract, which saw NL receive significantly less revenue than Quebec for the province's vast hydropower resources.

The core of the new agreement involves a substantial increase in the price that Hydro-Québec pays for electricity generated at…

READ MORE
Sudbury storm damage

Sudbury Hydro crews aim to reconnect service after storm

READ MORE

renewable energy protest

Why the shift toward renewable energy is not enough

READ MORE

wind-solar-energy-surpass-coal-in-us

Wind and Solar Energy Surpass Coal in U.S. Electricity Generation

READ MORE

lineman rescues car

Ameren, Safe Electricity urge safety near downed lines

READ MORE