AEP civil suits draw closer to trial date


CSA Z462 Arc Flash Training - Electrical Safety Compliance

Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.

  • Live Online
  • 6 hours Instructor-led
  • Group Training Available
Regular Price:
$249
Coupon Price:
$199
Reserve Your Seat Today

AEP Muskingum River explosion, a hydrogen storage blast at a coal-fired power plant, triggered OSHA violations, wrongful death and injury lawsuits, safety compliance scrutiny, and litigation over negligence in compressed hydrogen transfer and ventilation.

 

A Closer Look

A hydrogen blast at AEP's Muskingum River plant that killed one, drew OSHA fines, and sparked negligence lawsuits.

  • Hydrogen storage blast during tanker transfer
  • One death; nine workers injured
  • OSHA cited AEP: 1 willful, 8 serious violations
  • Poor ventilation, thin copper tubing alleged

 

Civil suits against American Electric Power stemming from a 2007 explosion near Beverly are inching closer to trial, with a hearing in Washington County Common Pleas Court.

 

The hearing was not open to the public but is one of the final steps leading up to a June 13 trial, similar to Kleen Energy lawsuits unfolding elsewhere, being brought by one of the men injured in the January 8 blast at AEP's Muskingum River power plant near Beverly.

The explosion killed one man and injured nine others, unlike a transformer fire with no injuries reported at another facility.

Geoffrey Brown, a Wheeling, W.Va., attorney representing former AEP worker Drumand McLaughlin, 53, of Caldwell, said his client suffered "very serious" injuries in the January 8 incident.

"They are mostly to the left shoulder and neck and are permanent and debilitating injuries," Brown said. "Also, he has had a great deal of psychological issues and stress. The explosion itself was massive. Anyone who has lived through something like that can tell you it affects you."

The suit seeks unspecified damages and alleges AEP was aware, or should have been aware, of problems, similar to OSHA findings at a Salem plant in another case, with a compressed hydrogen storage system that exploded during the transfer of the material from a tanker truck to the storage system.

Truck driver Lewis Timmons, 61, of New Martinsville, West Virginia, was killed in the explosion, which also damaged a generation unit at the plant and tore a 160-foot-by-160-foot section of metal siding from the building.

Brown said he also represents the Timmons family in a wrongful death suit against AEP and others that is filed in Moundsville, W.Va., and set to go to trial in August, with work troubled a blast victim coverage highlighting similar hardships.

The attorney representing the power company, Mathew Casto, of Charleston, W.Va., declined to comment on the pending suits.

In their written response to the suits, the company denies any wrongdoing.

AEP officials did not return a call seeking comment.

In August 2007, AEP paid more than $55,000 in fines after OSHA set fines in a power plant blast related to the case to settle federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration OSHA violations relating to the explosion.

The OSHA investigation led to one "willful" and eight "serious" violations, paralleling We Energies blast fine cases reported elsewhere, alleging the company demonstrated "intentional disregard or plain indifference to the law" in regard to the hydrogen storage.

Hydrogen is used as a cooling agent at the coal-fired power plant.

OSHA claimed the hydrogen cylinders were stored in an area that was not properly ventilated, which allowed for the accumulation of dangerous quantities of hydrogen.

Also, OSHA claimed AEP used thin-walled copper instead of stainless steel tubing for the system, a failure that in a Colorado dam fire case resulted in an indictment and highlighted risks, pressure relief devices were wrong and the containers were stored too close to oxygen and acetylene cylinders.

The trucking company Timmons was working for was also cited, with fines totaling $9,100.

The trucking company violations included failure to use non-sparking tools and failure to shut off the truck engine before starting the transfer of the hydrogen.

 

Related News

Related News

Tunisia moves ahead with smart electricity grid

Tunisia Smart Grid Project advances with an AFD loan as STEG deploys smart meters in…
View more

Two new BC generating stations officially commissioned

BC Hydro Site C and Clean Energy Policy shapes B.C.'s power mix, affecting run-of-river hydro,…
View more

Relief for power bills in B.C. offered to only part of province

BC Hydro COVID-19 Relief offers electricity bill credits for laid-off workers and small business support,…
View more

Electrifying: New cement makes concrete generate electricity

Cement-Based Conductive Composite transforms concrete into power by energy harvesting via triboelectric nanogenerator action, carbon…
View more

Setbacks at Hinkley Point C Challenge UK's Energy Blueprint

Hinkley Point C delays highlight EDF cost overruns, energy security risks, and wholesale power prices,…
View more

Plan to End E-Vehicle Subsidies Sparks Anger in Germany

Germany EV Subsidy Cut triggers budget-crisis fallout in the automotive industry, after a constitutional court…
View more

Sign Up for Electricity Forum’s Newsletter

Stay informed with our FREE Newsletter — get the latest news, breakthrough technologies, and expert insights, delivered straight to your inbox.

Electricity Today T&D Magazine Subscribe for FREE

Stay informed with the latest T&D policies and technologies.
  • Timely insights from industry experts
  • Practical solutions T&D engineers
  • Free access to every issue

Download the 2026 Electrical Training Catalog

Explore 50+ live, expert-led electrical training courses –

  • Interactive
  • Flexible
  • CEU-cerified