Ontario admits expiry of AECL bid a problem


NFPA 70E Training

Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.

  • Live Online
  • 6 hours Instructor-led
  • Group Training Available
Regular Price:
$199
Coupon Price:
$149
Reserve Your Seat Today

Ontario Nuclear Reactor Plan faces AECL's $26 billion bid, possible rebids to Areva and Westinghouse, federal restructuring delays, and parallel Darlington refurbishment and Pickering life-extension decisions amid global nuclear renaissance and policy debate.

 

What This Means

Ontario's plan to add reactors stalled over AECL costs and restructuring; Darlington and Pickering upgrades continue.

  • AECL's $26B bid deemed too costly by Ontario
  • Federal restructuring stalls negotiations and timelines
  • Rebid options include Areva and Westinghouse
  • Darlington refurbishment budgeted at $6-10B
  • Pickering extended 10 years with $300M investment

 

Ontario's plans to build two new nuclear reactors could suffer yet another delay this month with the expiration of the only bid accepted by the province, from Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd., the government conceded.

 

The province announced in 2006 that it wanted to build two new reactors to supply electricity, and eventually rejected two foreign bids, from Areva of France and Westinghouse of the United States, in favour of Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd.

Ontario also found AECL's bid was far too expensive — at a reported $26 billion — as it weighed nuclear options and has been trying to negotiate a better contract. That's been difficult since the federal government decided to restructure the nuclear agency, said Premier Dalton McGuinty.

"The federal industry is up in the air and we're not exactly sure where it's going, who's going to end up owning it." McGuinty told reporters.

"Until those unanswered questions are settled, it's very difficult for us to pursue any concrete conversations with the federal government."

The province could simply extend the deadline so the bid doesn't expire, or it could even open the bidding process again for Areva and Westinghouse, although that's not the preferred option, said Energy Minister Brad Duguid.

"We're still in discussions — I wouldn't call it negotiations exactly — with AECL and the federal government," said Duguid. "I really wouldn't rule anything out at this point in time, and at the same time I would hope that the federal government and AECL can work in good faith with us and get to a price that we feel is acceptable."

Ontario's Liberal government has dithered and delayed the decision on new nuclear reactors for far too long, the Opposition charged.

"They are so far behind the eight-ball already because of the unwillingness or fear to make a decision," said Progressive Conservative critic John Yakabuski. "Clearly the issue is they've been dragging their feet and doing nothing since 2006."

The New Democrats said the original decision to build new nuclear reactors was the wrong one, and the province now has the chance to abandon the idea in favour of renewable forms of energy and conservation programs.

Critics say the delay in the new build means Ontario will face much stiffer competition for construction materials and skilled labour to build the nuclear reactors.

U.S. President Barack Obama announced that he wants to build a new generation of reactors and said his country will have to play catch-up to join the global nuclear renaissance worldwide. "There are 56 nuclear reactors under construction around the world," said Obama: "Twenty-one in China alone; six in South Korea; five in India."

It's no surprise the Americans are taking a new look at nuclear power, said McGuinty.

Meanwhile, Duguid announced that it will cost between $6 billion and $10 billion to refurbish the Darlington nuclear power station to extend its life by another 30 to 40 years. It will be another four years before a more firm price estimate can be established, he said, with construction to start in 2016.

Ontario Power Generation also announced this week that it would spend $300 million to keep the Pickering nuclear station going for another 10 years before it is mothballed.

 

Related News

Related News

Portsmouth residents voice concerns over noise, flicker generated by turbine

Portsmouth Wind Turbine Complaints highlight noise, shadow flicker, resident impacts, Town Council hearings, and Green…
View more

Africa must quadruple power investment to supply electricity for all, IEA says

Africa Energy Investment must quadruple, says IEA, to deliver electricity access via grids, mini-grids, and…
View more

Europe's largest shore power plant opens

AIDAsol shore power Rostock-Warnemfcnde delivers cold ironing for cruise ships, up to 20 MVA at…
View more

Alberta creates fund to help communities hit by coal phase-out

Alberta Coal Community Transition Fund backs renewables, natural gas, and economic diversification, offering grants, workforce…
View more

Is Hydrogen The Future For Power Companies?

Hydrogen Energy Transition accelerates green hydrogen, electrolyzers, renewables, and fuel cells, as the EU and…
View more

U.S. Residents Averaged Fewer Power Outages in 2022

2022 U.S. Power Outage Statistics show lower SAIDI as fewer major events hit, with SAIFI…
View more

Sign Up for Electricity Forum’s Newsletter

Stay informed with our FREE Newsletter — get the latest news, breakthrough technologies, and expert insights, delivered straight to your inbox.

Electricity Today T&D Magazine Subscribe for FREE

Stay informed with the latest T&D policies and technologies.
  • Timely insights from industry experts
  • Practical solutions T&D engineers
  • Free access to every issue

Download the 2026 Electrical Training Catalog

Explore 50+ live, expert-led electrical training courses –

  • Interactive
  • Flexible
  • CEU-cerified