U.S. reps worry ocean policy will block development


Substation Relay Protection Training

Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.

  • Live Online
  • 12 hours Instructor-led
  • Group Training Available
Regular Price:
$699
Coupon Price:
$599
Reserve Your Seat Today

Ocean Policy Task Force Letter challenges the interim report on governance of oceans, coasts, and Great Lakes, highlighting offshore energy, drilling, fishing, recreation, conservation, and economic development amid recession-era concerns over environmental stewardship.

 

Inside the Issue

A bipartisan House letter criticizing ocean policy for favoring conservation over offshore energy and economic use.

  • Signed by 69 House members: 59 Republicans, 10 Democrats.
  • Critiques interim report as conservation-heavy, light on energy.
  • Warns against a backdoor moratorium on offshore drilling.

 

Dozens of U.S. representatives sent a letter to the head of the President's Interagency Ocean Policy Task Force with concerns that the policy will block offshore energy development and cost jobs.

 

Sixty-nine House members, including Alaska Rep. Don Young, signed the letter in which they responded to the task force's interim report released last month.

The task force is working on a national policy for governance of the country's oceans, coasts and Great Lakes. Two dozen senior policy members from numerous agencies are working on the national policy.

Washington Rep. Doc Hastings, the ranking Republican member of the House Natural Resources Committee, said it is important that the task force recognize multiple uses of the nation's oceans, from fishing to ocean power development to recreation.

"We can protect our oceans without inflicting more economic damage in the middle of a serious recession. Members from both sides of the aisle, with the GOP energy push gathering momentum across Congress, will strongly oppose any efforts by the administration to use this report as means of establishing a backdoor moratorium on offshore energy development," Hastings said in a release.

Rep. Bill Cassidy, a Republican from Louisiana, said the interim report "reflects an ideology that is at odds with American energy independence and job creation in the energy bill debate on Capitol Hill."

The letter was sent to Nancy Sutley, the ocean policy task force chairwoman. It was signed by 59 Republicans and 10 Democrats.

The letter says policies and principles laid out in the interim report focus heavily on environmental stewardship while not sufficiently supporting economic development of ocean resources and recreational uses according to testimony before an energy panel in Washington.

"We are particularly concerned about the task force's impact on our nation's ability to safely develop its own offshore energy, a point echoed by the Senate GOP in past debates, including oil, natural gas and renewable energy," it read.

New restrictions on energy development would cause prices to rise for consumers, negatively affect all Americans whose livelihoods depend on affordable energy and hurt Americans working in the offshore energy industry, it says.

The letter cites an American Energy Alliance report that says expanding drilling in the Outer Continental Shelf would generate 1.2 million jobs and $70 billion in additional wages annually, while increasing economic output by $8 trillion and $2.2 trillion in total tax receipts.

Sutley appreciates the input, said Christine M. Glunz, spokeswoman for the White House Council on Environmental Quality.

"When President Obama established the Ocean Policy Task Force, he recognized that, as clean energy talks proceed in the U.S. Senate, the demands on the ocean, coasts, and Great Lakes are intensifying and will continue to grow," she said.

Shell, which plans to drill exploratory wells next year on two leases in the Beaufort Sea off Alaska's north coast, also has reviewed the interim report. Shell spokesman Curtis Smith said the report makes little mention of energy or other economic issues and appears heavily weighted toward conservation and protection of the oceans.

"It's Shell's position that better balance is needed," he said.

Jim Ayers, vice president of Oceana, said he's also read the report and there is nothing in it to raise concerns about offshore energy development.

"This sounds like a bunch of people who have never heard of the Exxon Valdez," he said.

The Exxon Valdez oil tanker ran aground in Prince William Sound in 1989 and poured nearly 11 million gallons of crude resulting in the nation's worst oil spill on record.

 

Related News

Related News

Canada's looming power problem is massive but not insurmountable: report

Canada Net-Zero Electricity Buildout will double or triple power capacity, scaling clean energy, renewables, nuclear,…
View more

Nelson, B.C. Gets Charged Up on a New EV Fast-Charging Station

Nelson DC Fast-Charging EV Station delivers 50-kilowatt DCFC service at the community complex, expanding EV…
View more

TTC Bans Lithium-Ion-Powered E-Bikes and Scooters During Winter Months for Safety

TTC Winter E-Bike and E-Scooter Ban addresses lithium-ion battery safety, mitigating fire risk on Toronto…
View more

Scottish Wind Delivers Equivalent Of 98% Of Country’s October Electricity Demand

Scotland Wind Energy October saw renewables supply the equivalent of 98 percent of electricity demand,…
View more

California Utility Cuts Power to Massive Areas in Northern, Central California

PG&E Public Safety Power Shutoff curbs wildfire risk amid high winds, triggering California outages across…
View more

Magnitude 5 quake strikes near Iran nuclear plant

Iran Bushehr Earthquake rattles southern province near the Bushehr nuclear power plant, USGS reports M5.1…
View more

Sign Up for Electricity Forum’s Newsletter

Stay informed with our FREE Newsletter — get the latest news, breakthrough technologies, and expert insights, delivered straight to your inbox.

Electricity Today T&D Magazine Subscribe for FREE

Stay informed with the latest T&D policies and technologies.
  • Timely insights from industry experts
  • Practical solutions T&D engineers
  • Free access to every issue

Live Online & In-person Group Training

Advantages To Instructor-Led Training – Instructor-Led Course, Customized Training, Multiple Locations, Economical, CEU Credits, Course Discounts.

Request For Quotation

Whether you would prefer Live Online or In-Person instruction, our electrical training courses can be tailored to meet your company's specific requirements and delivered to your employees in one location or at various locations.