U.S. to table India atomic bill soon: envoy

David Mulford's comments came a day after the Democrats swept elections to U.S. Congress, heightening fears that the deal would not make it through the "lame duck" session of Senate and would have to wait until the new chambers assemble in 2007.

Although President George W. Bush's administration would push for the deal to be approved in the Senate session beginning next week, failure to win backing would only mean a delay and not hurt the new warmth between the two nations, the envoy said.

"The president has been deeply committed to getting this agreement through ... getting action on this," Mulford told a media briefing.

The deal aims to end a three-decade ban on nuclear trade with India to help New Delhi meet its growing energy needs and strengthen a new friendship between the once-estranged nations.

But it has faced hurdles ever since it was agreed in principle last year due to proliferation fears in the U.S. as India is not a member of the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and has conducted nuclear tests.

Politicians and nuclear experts in India have criticized it saying it could compromise India's nuclear program.

If the deal is not passed this month, negotiations would have to start all over again in a Congress dominated by Democrats traditionally opposed to proliferation.

Political analysts say this might scupper the deal as Congress could attach conditions unacceptable to India.

Mulford said the bill enjoyed strong backing from both the Democrats and the Republicans, but "lame duck" sessions were hard to predict as they did not have a fixed duration and had a busy agenda.

"So there is still a great deal of uncertainty," he said.

"But the prognosis looks very, very good. In an election that was deeply partisan with the United States deeply divided, it is important to bear in mind that the U.S.-India relationship is strongly supported as a bipartisan relationship.

However, Mulford cautioned that due to complicated U.S. legislative processes and the highly technical nature of the nuclear deal, a delay in the bill being passed by the "lame duck" session could not be ruled out.

"We all would regret the delay but I don't think it has any real significance for the strength and the vitality of the U.S.-India relationship," he said.