Navajo leader seeks grant for power plant


NFPA 70E Training

Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.

  • Live Online
  • 6 hours Instructor-led
  • Group Training Available
Regular Price:
$199
Coupon Price:
$149
Reserve Your Seat Today

Desert Rock Energy Project faces controversy in Four Corners as Navajo Nation coal-fired plant pursues DOE carbon capture funding, touts CCS, while critics cite air quality, mercury, ozone, and EPA permit hurdles.

 

In This Story

A proposed 1,500 MW Navajo coal plant seeking DOE CCS funding amid EPA review and air, mercury, and ozone concerns.

  • 1,500 MW coal-fired facility on Navajo Nation
  • Competes for $450M DOE carbon capture grant
  • Aims to capture ~50% of 10.9M tons CO2/year
  • EPA air permit remanded; BACT, PM, toxics reassessed
  • Critics cite air, mercury, ozone; propose renewables

 

Navajo Nation President Joe Shirley Jr. is seeking a federal grant to help pay for equipment designed to capture carbon emissions from a proposed coal-fired power plant on tribal land.

 

Environmentalists, the state of New Mexico and some Navajos have voiced concerns about the $3 billion Desert Rock Energy Project, saying a third coal-fired plant in the Four Corners region would compromise air quality, human health and the environment.

The tribe and Houston-based Sithe Global LLC have partnered to build the 1,500-megawatt plant, which they say will be one of the cleanest coal-burning plants in the nation even without capturing carbon emissions and storing them.

Still, Shirley said the Navajo Nation would be able to establish itself as a leader in clean-coal technology if the U.S. Department of Energy awards a grant. The Navajos are competing for $450 million available for carbon capture projects.

The tribe could find out in November whether it will receive any funding.

"The president is extremely hopeful," Shirley spokesman George Hardeen said.

Desert Rock developers say about half of the plant's carbon dioxide emissions could be captured using the technology. The plant is expected to produce about 10.9 million tons of carbon dioxide per year.

Critics who have tried to stall the Desert Rock Energy Project at nearly every turn, similar to critics of proposed coal plants in Nevada, said carbon capture technology would not do enough to quell their concerns about the plant's impact on the region.

"You still have a whopping problem here. That's still a vast source of new carbon dioxide and you've got mercury and ozone," said Mike Eisenfeld of San Juan Citizens Alliance.

Eisenfeld called the grant application a "disingenuous ploy" to keep the project going.

The project suffered a setback when a federal appeals board ordered the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency back to the drawing board on the plant's air permit process.

The agency must consider whether Desert Rock will be outfitted with the best technology to control emissions. It also will reassess limits for particulate matter emissions, analyze methods for controlling hazardous emissions and finish consulting with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service about endangered species issues.

The process could take months and possibly another round of public comment.

Shirley said the tribe is not giving up on developing Desert Rock. He called it the Navajos' most important economic development project.

"It will provide thousands of good jobs for our people, and unlike a power plant shutdown that can depress nearby economies, it will fund almost one-third of the Navajo Nation's annual operating budget," he said. "It is a key to our saving self, to ending our dependence on the federal government and to regaining our independence as a nation and a people."

Shirley said one good thing that comes from the EPA reviewing the air permit is that the agency now has the opportunity to consider the potential for using carbon capture and storage at Desert Rock.

He also took a jab at the project's critics, saying they are more interested in stopping the use of coal in the U.S. than in having Desert Rock be the most environmentally sound plant it can be.

Eisenfeld countered that many environmentalists want the Navajos to be successful in their economic ventures but to consider renewable energy rather than a coal-fired plant.

 

Related News

Related News

What can we expect from clean hydrogen in Canada

Canadian Clean Hydrogen is surging, driven by net-zero goals, tax credits, and exports. Fuel cells,…
View more

5 ways Texas can improve electricity reliability and save our economy

Texas Power Grid Reliability faces ERCOT blackouts and winter storm risks; solutions span weatherization, natural…
View more

Britain breaks record for coal-free power generation - but what does this mean for your energy bills?

UK Coal-Free Electricity Record highlights rapid growth in renewables as National Grid phases out coal;…
View more

Global push needed to ensure "clean, affordable and sustainable electricity" for all

SDG7 Energy Progress Report assesses global energy access, renewables, clean cooking, and efficiency, citing COVID-19…
View more

As Alberta electricity generators switch to gas, power price cap comes under spotlight

Alberta Energy-Only Electricity Market faces capacity market debate, AESO price cap review, and coal-to-gas shifts…
View more

Bangladesh develops nuclear power with IAEA Assistance

Bangladesh Rooppur Nuclear Power Plant advances nuclear energy with IAEA support and ROSATOM construction, boosting…
View more

Sign Up for Electricity Forum’s Newsletter

Stay informed with our FREE Newsletter — get the latest news, breakthrough technologies, and expert insights, delivered straight to your inbox.

Electricity Today T&D Magazine Subscribe for FREE

Stay informed with the latest T&D policies and technologies.
  • Timely insights from industry experts
  • Practical solutions T&D engineers
  • Free access to every issue

Download the 2026 Electrical Training Catalog

Explore 50+ live, expert-led electrical training courses –

  • Interactive
  • Flexible
  • CEU-cerified