New Solar Energy Project Will Power South Metro Co-Op Members

SaskPower Renewable Energy 2030 advances 50% renewables through wind power, solar projects, and geothermal research, backed by natural gas capacity, grid integration, competitive procurement, PPAs, and capacity expansion to meet rising demand in Saskatchewan.

Key Points

SaskPower's plan to reach 50% renewable power by 2030 via wind, solar, geothermal research, and supporting natural gas.

✅ Plans to reach 2,100 MW wind and 60 MW solar by 2030

✅ Geothermal pilot via PPA; grid integration projects

✅ New gas plants add 700 MW+ for reliability, demand growth

SaskPower says progress is being made on its goal of increasing renewable electricity generation from the current 25 per cent to as much as 50 per cent by 2030, as outlined in its 2019-20 annual report released.

The Crown corporation announced in 2015 it would reduce emissions by 40 per cent below 2005 levels by 2030, which would involve doubling the percentage of renewable electricity.

“Developing cleaner electricity generation options is essential to power Saskatchewan’s future and I’m excited to see that future continuing to take shape,” Tim Eckel, SaskPower’s vice-president of asset management, planning and sustainability, said in a press release.

“In the past two years, we have started a number of new renewable generation projects as well as projects that support renewable integration. Saskatchewan people will see more of that as we continue towards 2030.”

SaskPower has announced plans to add 60 megawatt (MW) of ground solar generation by 2021 through a combination of competitive procurement, a partnership with First Nations Power Authority and community projects such as the Flying Dust First Nation agreement now under consideration.

A competitive process for Saskatchewan’s first 10 MW utility-scale solar project has also been launched.

Wind power capacity is expected to increase from the current 221 MW to around 2,100 MW by 2030. SaskPower has launched the competitive process to buy up to 200 MW of wind generation with the successful proponent expected to be named this spring.

A power purchase agreement with DEEP Earth Energy Production Corp. was signed in May to allow further research into the potential for Saskatchewan’s first geothermal power project under study.

At the same time, SaskPower said it must increase its overall generation capacity in response to the province’s growing demand for electricity, including during record power demand periods.

“We are evaluating the full range of generation options, including imports from Manitoba Hydro as needed, which will allow us to determine the portfolio that best allows us to deliver reliable, cost-effective and sustainable power,” the Crown corporation said in a press release.

SaskPower has started construction on the Chinook Power Station, which will add 350 MW of natural gas generation as well as announced site considerations for the province’s next 350 MW to 700 MW natural gas plant.

Related News

• Electricity Forum News

• Power Generation News

Arizona Rooftop Solar Battle intensifies as regulators weigh net metering, utility fees, and solar credits; APS, Pinnacle West, and SolarCity flood elections, shaping Arizona Corporation Commission policy and statewide renewable energy incentives.

Key Points

A high-stakes clash over net metering, utility fees, and solar credits before Arizona regulators, affecting consumers.

✅ Utilities seek higher fees and lower net metering credits

✅ Solar firms fund campaigns to sway regulator elections

✅ Decision could reshape statewide rooftop solar economics

Arizona - November 3, 2016 - There’s a war brewing over the future of rooftop solar, and Arizona is at ground zero.

Pinnacle West Capital Corp., which owns the state’s largest utility, last week said it has formed a third-party group to support candidates for an elected state board that regulates their industry. The move promises to inject $1 million into a race in which SolarCity Corp., a rooftop solar provider, is already planning to spend $2 million though a nonprofit it supports, according to officials from the two groups.

It’s the latest twist in a three-year political battle, mirrored by debates over energy freedom in the South among advocates, that’s been punctuated by charges of undue influence, an ongoing probe by the U.S. Attorney’s office and $300,000 in threatened state fines. At stake: A board ruling on a request to raise fees and drastically cut how much homeowners are paid for the solar energy they generate. It’s a decision, foes say, with the potential to hamstring a growing renewables industry.

“It’s not surprising that you are seeing campaign-style tactics in what should be a wonky policy matter because there is a lot at stake here,” said Tyson Slocum, director of the energy program at Public Citizen, a consumer advocacy group. “The rooftop solar issue has become broadly politicized.”

Utilities nationwide are pushing regulators to cut mandated solar payments, as they seek to tilt the solar market in their favor, an expense they say requires them to boost rates on non-solar customers in order to maintain the grid. Solar supporters, meanwhile, say a big drop in the amount paid to homeowners would undermine the benefits of switching to green power and imperil the industry’s double-digit annual growth.

A decision by Arizona, which last year generated the third most solar power in the U.S., could serve as a bellwether for national change at a time when as many as two dozen other states are weighing the same issue, with a Michigan push to eliminate rooftop caps highlighting the trend, according to a report by the North Carolina Clean Energy Technology Center.

In December, Nevada regulators voted to allow utilities to increase fees and reduce payments to home solar users. A month later, California rejected reduced solar credits, even as electricity pricing changes pose an existential threat to residential rooftop solar there. Now, the spotlight swings to Arizona, one of only 14 states with an elected board -- the Arizona Corporation Commission -- that sets regulatory policy and utility rates.

Arizona has long required utilities to pay consumers for solar energy they put back into the grid. In November 2013, the commission allowed utilities to assess a small connection fee to offset part of that payment. Now, the commission is being asked to consider a proposal from Pinnacle West’s Arizona Public Service unit that would almost triple the fee for some customers to $24 a month, and cut consumer credits for solar power by as much as 80 percent. 

Arizona Public Service has more than 50,000 customers with home solar. To pay them, the company estimated it will have to raise bills for non-solar customers by $51 million annually starting next year. At the same time, as consumer choice in California suddenly reshapes the electricity business, a June report from Credit Suisse Group AG said approving the new proposal could make solar "uneconomic" across a state that is among the nation’s leaders in the use of home solar.

Public Debate

The issue has spurred an active public debate, pulling in homeowners from both sides of the argument.

Those without solar say they shouldn’t be paying extra for those who do. "People with solar panels on their roofs think they ought to have free electricity," said Fannalou Guggisberg, a retired military chaplain in Sun City West. "I don’t think it’s fair for them to sell back electricity and not pay any taxes on it.”

Proponents counter that charging a fee only serves to discourage the growth of home solar as a feasible energy alternative. "APS is actually battling solar people," said Russell Taylor, a cabinet maker in Goodyear. "They want a monopoly."

Meanwhile, the involvement of the companies has drawn the attention of U.S. and state authorities.

Two Subpoenas

In a U.S. filing in August, Pinnacle West said it received two grand jury subpoenas from the U.S. attorney in June seeking information on the commission’s 2014 elections. While the FBI wouldn’t discuss the specifics of the subpoenas, spokeswoman Jill McCabe confirmed the agency is investigating “certain statewide races in the 2014 election cycle.”

Alan Bunnell, a spokesman for Pinnacle West, has said the company is “cooperating fully with the U.S. Attorney’s office in this matter.”

The probe follows public complaints by a former commissioner, Sandra Kennedy, that the company sought to improperly influence the 2013 fee decision. A year later, Kennedy lost a bid to rejoin the commission in a campaign that saw two nonprofit groups spend $3.2 million in support of board candidates favorable to Pinnacle West.

Spokesmen for both non-profit groups -- Save Our Future Now, and the Arizona Free Enterprise Club -- declined to identify their benefactors, or to comment for this article. James McDonald, a spokesman for the Arizona Public Service unit, declined to say whether the company contributed to either.

"We’ve always complied with all disclosure requests," McDonald said in an e-mail. "We have an obligation to our customers and our shareholders to be politically active.”

Missed Deadlines

SolarCity, meanwhile, hasn’t gone unscathed.

Kris Mayes, president of the nonprofit group Save our AZ Solar, confirmed that SolarCity is its sole funder after the company’s spokeswoman, Suzanne Merkelson, referred calls to her. The group, which records show has received $2 million in contributions, faces fines of as much as $300,000 for missing deadlines on filing reports, according to Thomas Collins, executive director of the Arizona Citizens Clean Elections Commission.

Save our AZ Solar is trying to settle the matter with the commission for $8,000 to $15,000, Mayes said, adding that any violations were inadvertent. "We have been all about transparency and disclosure from the very beginning," she said.

For the 2016 election, Pinnacle West formed the AZ Coalition for Reliable Electricity to openly back three Republicans for board seats, the company said in an e-mailed statement on Oct. 24. Matthew Benson, the group’s spokesman, confirmed the $1 million spending target.

Robert Burns, a commissioner backed by SolarCity in his re-election bid, said he’s concerned about the amount of financing attached to the race. "But there’s nothing I can do about it," he said, noting that the commission has called on companies with business before it to refrain from funding commission campaigns. "I can’t control what they do."

Related News

• Electricity Forum News

• Energy Policy News

Canada Solar Energy lags despite falling costs, with 0.5% of electricity from solar, largely in Ontario. NEB reports renewables replacing coal, while wind, hydro, and utility-scale capacity grow alongside distributed rooftop systems.

Key Points

Canada Solar Energy refers to the nation's solar market, supplying 0.5% of electricity, mostly concentrated in Ontario.

✅ 0.5% of Canada's electricity from solar, mainly in Ontario

✅ Costs per watt near $0.95; utility and rooftop PV expanding

✅ Wind and hydro grow as coal is phased out by 2030

Although the cost to build solar power has plummeted over the last decade, a new report suggests Canadians aren't rushing use the sun to make electricity.

The National Energy Board has released its annual look at the state of renewable energy in Canada and it says solar energy accounts for just 0.5 per cent of all Canada's generated electricity.

And almost all of that exists entirely in Ontario, the report notes, though renewable growth projections were scaled back after a provincial clean energy program was scrapped by policymakers.

NEB chief economist Shelley Milutinovic said the trend in Canada is that renewable energy sources like wind and solar are replacing coal as Canada moves to eliminate that as a source of electricity by 2030.

Between 2005 and 2016, non-hydroelectric renewables - wind, solar and biomass - grew from 1.5 per cent of total electricity generation in Canada to 7.2 per cent.

During that same period coal fell from 16 per cent to 9.3 per cent as a source of power. Canada intends to eliminate coal as a source of power by 2030 and only four provinces still get any power from the fossil fuel.

The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development released a review of Canada's environmental policies this week which gave the country a rough ride for its energy-intensive, high-emitting, resource-based economy, but did point to Canada's electrical supply as a positive.

Only about 20 per cent of Canada's electricity comes from fossil fuels now - divided almost equally between coal and natural gas. Nuclear energy accounts for 15 per cent of Canada's electricity supply.

The rest comes from renewables. Hydro is the big beast in that, responsible for almost 60 per cent of Canada's power in 2016. While actual hydro power generation has grown about seven per cent in the last decade, Canada ranks in the top 10 for hydropower jobs even as other renewables are exploding.

The amount of electricity generated by the wind is 20 times what it was in 2005, and wind as a percentage of total power grew from just 0.2 per cent in 2005 to 4.7 per cent in 2016.

Solar didn't exist as a source of power for utility companies in Canada a decade ago. By 2016, solar capacity was 2,310 megawatts, almost all of it in Ontario, and national capacity is set to hit 5 GW according to recent reports.

Outside of Ontario, solar installations are mostly quite small, though the Prairie Provinces are projected to lead upcoming renewable growth across Canada. The largest solar farm in western Canada is a two-megawatt one on the Green Acres Hutterite Colony east of Calgary.

Milutinovic said the costs of solar and wind are now very comparable to other sources of power which are making them more and more attractive.

The cost to install a solar panel is about one-tenth of what it was in 2000, at about 95 cents per watt, according to the International Energy Agency.

Despite that, Canada is outmatched in solar on the international scene.

While Canada's biggest solar farm is about 100 megawatts, India this year unleashed one 10 times as large. The Kunrool Ultra Mega Solar Park is the largest in the world with 1000 megawatts of installed capacity.

India had just 17 megawatts of installed solar capacity in 2010. It now has 12,000 megawatts.

China is the world's solar leader, both in the manufacturing of solar panels and their installation. In 2005, China had 70 megawatts of installed solar power. In 2016,China had developed 78,000 MW.

Canada is 13th in the world in the amount of installed solar capacity. Where Canada gets just 0.5 per cent of its power from solar, Italy gets 7.5 per cent, Germany gets 6.7 per cent, Japan 4.9 per cent, the United States 1.4 per cent, China 1.07 per cent, and the Netherlands outpaces Canada in solar output as well.

Milutinovic said the one thing not measured in this report however is the capacity for solar installations on private homes and businesses. She said some of the Ontario solar generation numbers include those, but elsewhere that is simply not being tracked.

So there is no good data on how many individuals now have solar panels on their roofs or how many farms have them in their fields.

She said it is one area governments should be looking at to get a better picture of what is actually happening on this front.

Related News

• Electricity Forum News

• Renewable Energy News

India Solar Safeguard Duty could impose a 70% tariff on Chinese and Malaysian solar cells and modules, citing serious injury, protecting domestic manufacturing, affecting imports, prices, tenders, and the 2017 record-low tariff trajectory.

Key Points

A proposed 70% provisional tariff on Chinese and Malaysian solar cells and modules to protect India's domestic industry.

✅ 70% provisional duty for 200 days on cells and modules

✅ Aims to prevent serious injury and job losses

✅ Likely to raise tariffs and slow tendered solar projects

India, the largest importer of Chinese solar equipment, proposed a 70 per cent "safeguard duty" on cells and modules shipped from China, where solar is cheaper than grid electricity in many cities, and Malaysia, citing “threat of serious injury” to the domestic industry.

Acting on an application by five local cell and module makers, the Directorate General of Safeguards, Customs and Central Excise made the proposal in a document dated Jan. 5. It recommended the levy remain in effect for 200 days, as Germany saw a solar power boost amid broader energy concerns.

“Existing critical circumstances justify the immediate imposition of a provisional safeguard duty in order to save the domestic industry from further serious injury, which would be difficult to repair,” the Finance Ministry said in the document, also citing the potential for job losses.

Globally, external shocks such as the coronavirus pandemic have stalled a third of new U.S. utility solar this year, according to one report.

India’s annual manufacturing capacity for solar cells is only around 3 GW, compared with the average requirement of 20 GW for its on-grid solar power sector, according to a government note last month. The rest has to be purchased on the international market, it said. The South Asian nation was the largest solar-cell and module importer from China last year, buying a third of that nation’s $8 billion of shipments from January through September, according to research by Bloomberg New Energy Finance.

The ministry’s document said China’s solar exports to India constituted 1.52 percent of its total global exports during 2012, a figure that surged to almost 22 percent in 2016.

“India’s solar story is built on Chinese panels, and the duty, if implemented, would mean the end of record low solar tariffs that we saw in 2017,” said Vandana Gombar, a BNEF analyst in New Delhi, even as India's solar growth slows in recent assessments.

The government’s proposal came after five domestic manufacturers — Adani Enterprises Ltd.-backed Mundra Solar PV Ltd., Indosolar Ltd., Jupiter Solar Power Ltd., Websol Energy Systems Ltd. and Helios Photo Voltaic Ltd. — filed an application on Dec. 5 seeking a duty on imports of solar cells “whether or not assembled in modules or panels.”

Related News

• Electricity Forum News

• Renewable Energy News

U.S. Solar Generation Forecast highlights rising photovoltaics, utility-scale and small-scale growth across residential, commercial, and industrial sectors, shaped by Investment Tax Credit policy and EIA Short-Term and Annual Energy Outlook projections.

Key Points

An estimate of U.S. solar generation shares, spanning PV and solar thermal across utility-scale and small-scale sources.

✅ 2020: 3% of U.S. electricity; 2021: 4%; 2022: 5% (STEO).

✅ Reference: 14% by 2035, 20% by 2050 (AEO2021).

✅ Utility-scale share grows to 78% by 2050; ITC supports builds.

According to our Electric Power Annual, solar power accounted for 3% of U.S. electricity generation from all sources in 2020, as renewables became the second-most prevalent source that year overall. In our Short-Term Energy Outlook, we forecast that solar will account for 4% of U.S. electricity generation in 2021 and 5% in 2022, though 4.7% share in 2022 was reported by independent sources. In our Annual Energy Outlook 2021 (AEO2021) Reference case, which assumes no change in current laws and regulations, we project that solar generation will make up 14% of the U.S. total in 2035 and 20% in 2050. These data include electricity generated from both utility-scale (those of 1 megawatt or more generating capacity) and small-scale (less than 1 megawatt) solar facilities in the electric power, residential, commercial, and industrial sectors.

Humans have been using solar energy for centuries and first produced solar-powered electricity in the United States in 1954. Currently, solar energy can generate electricity in two ways: solar photovoltaics (PV) and solar thermal, and has become the third-largest renewable source in the United States. Solar PV cells, such as rooftop solar panels, directly convert sunlight into electricity. Solar thermal facilities use mirrors to concentrate sunlight at a central receptor and produce the high temperatures needed to generate electricity with a steam-powered turbine.

Increases in small-scale solar, particularly in the commercial and residential sectors, drove much of the early growth in U.S. solar electricity net generation, while 82% of the 2023 utility-scale pipeline is now wind, solar, and batteries nationwide. In 2011, small-scale solar accounted for 68% of total U.S. solar electricity net generation. However, utility-scale solar generation increased substantially in the United States during the past decade as average construction costs for solar power plants fell.

In our long-term projections, the electric power sector continues to produce the most solar generation, increasing from 68% of total solar generation in 2020 to 78% in 2050. The growing share of utility-scale generation is due in part to the availability of a 10% Investment Tax Credit (ITC) after 2023, and policy proposals such as tenfold expansion of solar have been discussed; in contrast, the ITC for small-scale solar has expired.

The AEO2021’s projected share of solar generation is affected by assumptions about the installed and operating costs of other generating technologies, particularly in later years of the projection period when the projected trends in solar are increasingly influenced by economic factors rather than policy, and 30% from wind and solar is seen as attainable under broader market trends. In a sensitivity case in which natural gas prices are higher than in the Reference case (the Low Oil and Gas Supply case), solar generation reaches 25% of total generation by 2050, compared with 20% in the Reference case, while one-fourth of U.S. electricity is projected for renewables. In another sensitivity case in which installed costs of renewables are lower than in the Reference case (the Low Renewables Costs case), solar generation makes up 27% of total generation by 2050.

Related News

• Electricity Forum News

• Renewable Energy News

U.S. Wind and Solar Power Potential shows 80 percent reliable supply via renewable energy, grid integration, energy storage, and transmission upgrades, while seasonal variability demands backup sources like nuclear, hydropower, and demand management.

Key Points

An estimate that wind and solar can supply 80 percent of US demand, with storage, transmission, and low-carbon backups.

✅ 36-year hourly weather data modeled supply and demand

✅ 80 percent reliable with 12-hour storage or continental transmission

✅ Beyond 80 percent needs seasonal storage, nuclear, hydro, demand response

The United States could reliably meet about 80 percent of its electricity demand with solar and wind power generation, according to scientists at the University of California, Irvine; the California Institute of Technology; and the Carnegie Institution for Science.

However, meeting 100 percent of electricity demand with only solar and wind energy, which helps explain why the grid isn't yet 100% renewable today, would require storing several weeks' worth of electricity to compensate for the natural variability of these two resources, the researchers said.

"The sun sets, and the wind doesn't always blow," noted Steven Davis, UCI associate professor of Earth system science and co-author of a renewable energy study published today in the journal Energy & Environmental Science. "If we want a reliable power system based on these resources, how do we deal with their daily and seasonal changes?"

The team analyzed 36 years of hourly U.S. weather data (1980 to 2015) to understand the fundamental geophysical barriers to supplying electricity with only solar and wind energy.

"We looked at the variability of solar and wind energy over both time and space and compared that to U.S. electricity demand," Davis said. "What we found is that we could reliably get around 80 percent of our electricity from these sources by building either a continental-scale transmission network or facilities that could store 12 hours' worth of the nation's electricity demand."

The researchers said that such expansion of transmission or storage capabilities would mean very substantial -- but not inconceivable -- investments, and initiatives like tenfold solar expansion would remake the U.S. electricity system. They estimated that the cost of the new transmission lines required, for example, could be hundreds of billions of dollars. In comparison, storing that much electricity with today's cheapest batteries would likely cost more than a trillion dollars, although prices are falling.

Other forms of energy stockpiling, such as pumping water uphill to later flow back down through hydropower generators, are attractive but limited in scope. The U.S. has a lot of water in the East but not much elevation, with the opposite arrangement in the West.

Fossil fuel-based electricity production is responsible for about 38 percent of U.S. carbon dioxide emissions -- CO2 pollution being the major cause of global climate change. Davis said he is heartened by the progress that has been made, such as when renewables surpassed coal in 2022 nationwide, and the prospects for the future.

"The fact that we could get 80 percent of our power from wind and solar alone is really encouraging," he said, and recent data show renewables hit a record 28% in April nationwide. "Five years ago, many people doubted that these resources could account for more than 20 or 30 percent."

But beyond the 80 percent mark, the amount of energy storage required to overcome seasonal and weather variabilities increases rapidly. "Our work indicates that low-carbon-emission power sources will be needed to complement what we can harvest from the wind and sun until storage and transmission capabilities are up to the job," said co-author Ken Caldeira of the Carnegie Institution for Science. "Options could include nuclear and hydroelectric power generation, as well as managing demand and other ways to meet decarbonization goals identified by researchers."

Related News

• Electricity Forum News

• Renewable Energy News