Haler Seeks Nuclear Facility

State Rep. Larry Haler has introduced a resolution asking Congress to consider Hanford for construction of a nuclear power plant that would test the next generation of nuclear technology.

It's a shot that's longer than long, and for an array of reasons, including the likelihood that any such demonstration project would be built near the Idaho National Laboratory in Idaho Falls. The Idaho lab is spearheading development efforts for new technology that would make nuclear reactors safer, more efficient and more reliable.

Supporters also envision the reactor producing hydrogen for hydrogen fuel cells that could replace fossil fuels.

If nothing else, Haler wants to at least put Hanford on the radar screens of decision makers for future federal endeavors to advance nuclear technology.

With the brain power and know-how of having operated federal reactors, the Fast Flux Test Facility experimental reactor and the operating commercial nuclear power plant owned by Energy Northwest, Hanford is an ideal home for a prototype for the nation's nuclear future, Haler said.

"I think this is the most rational place to have a demonstration facility," the Richland Republican said.

So he figures it couldn't hurt to ask. Often called letters to Santa Claus, resolutions carry no force of law. House Joint Memorial 4025 is merely a request to Congress, the Department of Energy and President Bush.

That said, "I don't think it's an empty gesture," Haler said.

Before it can be sent, the resolution must be approved by the Legislature, and some state lawmakers likely will frown on a plan that asks for more nuclear power in Washington.

Though nuclear plants don't generate the carbon dioxide emissions conventional fossil fuel plants do, the uncertainty over what to do with nuclear waste complicates the issue, said Rep. Jeff Morris, an Anacortes Democrat and chairman of the House Technology, Energy and Communications Committee.

"From our caucus' perspective, the back end of the life cycle cost is something that has to be fully accounted for," he said.

"Nuclear has been a dirty word in Washington state for a long, long time, but it's not off the table right now," said Sen. Erik Poulsen, a Seattle Democrat and chairman of the Senate Water, Energy and Environment Committee. "I think there will come a day when Washington looks at nuclear as a viable alternative, but I don't think you'll see it in the next 60 days."