Regulators urge dismissal of PATH line


Protective Relay Training - Basic

Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.

  • Live Online
  • 12 hours Instructor-led
  • Group Training Available
Regular Price:
$699
Coupon Price:
$599
Reserve Your Seat Today

PATH Transmission Line Withdrawal reflects PJM Interconnection's demand forecast, prompting AEP and FirstEnergy to suspend the 275-mile project as SCC regulators review the motion to withdraw for the mid-Atlantic electric grid.

 

What's Going On

Regulators assessing AEP and FirstEnergy's bid to cancel PATH after PJM forecast weaker mid-Atlantic power demand.

  • PJM forecast reduced regional electricity demand
  • AEP and FirstEnergy moved to withdraw PATH
  • SCC hearing examiner recommends approval

 

Virginia regulators are recommending the dismissal of an application to build a $2 billion power line from West Virginia to Maryland.

 

A hearing examiner with the State Corporation Commission said that regulators should approve a motion to withdraw filed by American Electric Power and FirstEnergy Corp.

The utilities had pulled their Virginia line application earlier and suspended the plan to build the 765-kilowatt line in February because PJM Interconnection, the group that oversees the electric grid for a 13-state region, forecasts weaker-than-expected demand for electricity in mid-Atlantic states and directed the companies to halt the project.

The 275-mile Potomac-Appalachian Transmission Highline PATH was to run from AEP's John Amos power station in Putnam County, West Virginia, 31 miles across three counties in northern Virginia, to a substation near Kemptown, Maryland. It was originally envisioned to meet expectations of growing demand for electricity in the region, but AEP moved to withdraw from PATH after forecasts weakened. Officials predicted that if the line wasn't built, the region would suffer from brownouts and blackouts.

The SCC must still issue a final order even as regulators will not delay proceedings in related matters. West Virginia regulators, who had delayed a decision earlier in the process, and Maryland regulators have already granted withdrawal requests.

Related News

U.S. renewable electricity surpassed coal in 2022

2022 US Renewable Power Milestone highlights EIA data: wind and solar outpaced coal and nuclear,…
View more

EV Fires Raise Health Concerns for Firefighters

EV Firefighter Cancer Risks: lithium-ion battery fires, toxic metals like nickel and chromium, hazardous smoke…
View more

Midwest Communities Press State Lawmakers to Limit Data Center T&D Burdens

Midwest Data Center Regulation accelerates as counties adopt moratoria and state lawmakers weigh measures to…
View more

Energy Vault Lands $110M From SoftBank’s Vision Fund for Gravity Storage

Energy Vault Gravity Storage uses crane-stacked concrete blocks to deliver long-duration, grid-scale renewable energy; a…
View more

Americans aren't just blocking our oil pipelines, now they're fighting Hydro-Quebec's clean power lines

Champlain Hudson Power Express connects Hydro-Québec hydropower to the New York grid via a 1.25…
View more

Three Mile Island at center of energy debate: Let struggling nuclear plants close or save them

Three Mile Island Nuclear Debate spotlights subsidies, carbon pricing, wholesale power markets, grid reliability, and…
View more

Sign Up for Electricity Forum’s Newsletter

Stay informed with our FREE Newsletter — get the latest news, breakthrough technologies, and expert insights, delivered straight to your inbox.

Electricity Today T&D Magazine Subscribe for FREE

Stay informed with the latest T&D policies and technologies.
  • Timely insights from industry experts
  • Practical solutions T&D engineers
  • Free access to every issue

Download the 2026 Electrical Training Catalog

Explore 50+ live, expert-led electrical training courses –

  • Interactive
  • Flexible
  • CEU-cerified