Regulators urge dismissal of PATH line


NFPA 70E Training

Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.

  • Live Online
  • 6 hours Instructor-led
  • Group Training Available
Regular Price:
$199
Coupon Price:
$149
Reserve Your Seat Today

PATH Transmission Line Withdrawal reflects PJM Interconnection's demand forecast, prompting AEP and FirstEnergy to suspend the 275-mile project as SCC regulators review the motion to withdraw for the mid-Atlantic electric grid.

 

What's Going On

Regulators assessing AEP and FirstEnergy's bid to cancel PATH after PJM forecast weaker mid-Atlantic power demand.

  • PJM forecast reduced regional electricity demand
  • AEP and FirstEnergy moved to withdraw PATH
  • SCC hearing examiner recommends approval

 

Virginia regulators are recommending the dismissal of an application to build a $2 billion power line from West Virginia to Maryland.

 

A hearing examiner with the State Corporation Commission said that regulators should approve a motion to withdraw filed by American Electric Power and FirstEnergy Corp.

The utilities had pulled their Virginia line application earlier and suspended the plan to build the 765-kilowatt line in February because PJM Interconnection, the group that oversees the electric grid for a 13-state region, forecasts weaker-than-expected demand for electricity in mid-Atlantic states and directed the companies to halt the project.

The 275-mile Potomac-Appalachian Transmission Highline PATH was to run from AEP's John Amos power station in Putnam County, West Virginia, 31 miles across three counties in northern Virginia, to a substation near Kemptown, Maryland. It was originally envisioned to meet expectations of growing demand for electricity in the region, but AEP moved to withdraw from PATH after forecasts weakened. Officials predicted that if the line wasn't built, the region would suffer from brownouts and blackouts.

The SCC must still issue a final order even as regulators will not delay proceedings in related matters. West Virginia regulators, who had delayed a decision earlier in the process, and Maryland regulators have already granted withdrawal requests.

Related News

Franklin Energy and Consumers Energy Support Small Businesses During COVID-19 with Virtual Energy Coaching

Consumers Energy Virtual Energy Coaching connects Michigan small businesses with remote efficiency experts to cut…
View more

UK must start construction of large-scale storage or fail to meet net zero targets.

UK Hydrogen Storage Caverns enable long-duration, low-carbon electricity balancing, storing surplus wind and solar power…
View more

Key Ontario power system staff may end up locked down at work sites due to COVID-19, operator says

Ontario IESO COVID-19 Control Room Measures detail how essential operators safeguard the electricity grid with…
View more

Power industry may ask staff to live on site as Coronavirus outbreak worsens

Power plant staff sequestration isolates essential operators on-site at plants and control centers, safeguarding critical…
View more

Power outage update: 252,596 remain without electricity Wednesday

North Carolina Power Outages continue after Hurricane Florence, with Wilmington and Eastern Carolina facing flooding,…
View more

Ottawa sets out to protect its hydro heritage

Ottawa Hydro Substation Heritage Designation highlights Hydro Ottawa's 1920s architecture, Art Deco facades, and municipal…
View more

Sign Up for Electricity Forum’s Newsletter

Stay informed with our FREE Newsletter — get the latest news, breakthrough technologies, and expert insights, delivered straight to your inbox.

Electricity Today T&D Magazine Subscribe for FREE

Stay informed with the latest T&D policies and technologies.
  • Timely insights from industry experts
  • Practical solutions T&D engineers
  • Free access to every issue

Download the 2026 Electrical Training Catalog

Explore 50+ live, expert-led electrical training courses –

  • Interactive
  • Flexible
  • CEU-cerified