Two carbon capture projects scrapped


NFPA 70E Training

Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.

  • Live Online
  • 6 hours Instructor-led
  • Group Training Available
Regular Price:
$199
Coupon Price:
$149
Reserve Your Seat Today

CCS Project Cancellations highlight Fortum exiting Finncap at Meri Pori and Dutch plans at Barendrecht halted, citing CO2 storage risks, EU funding gaps, local opposition, and E.ON's stalled Kingsnorth capture project.

 

The Big Picture

Pullbacks from CCS projects like Fortum's Finncap and Barendrecht storage, driven by risks, costs and local opposition.

  • Fortum exits Finncap CCS at 565 MW Meri Pori plant
  • TVO withdrew; EU aid covered only part of €500m cost
  • Dutch cancels Barendrecht CO2 storage over delays, opposition
  • E.ON cancels Kingsnorth CCS; Siemens Energy loses partner

 

Two leading European carbon capture and storage projects have been scrapped due to financial issues and delays.

 

Energy company Fortum Oyj has announced that it is pulling out of the Finncap project in Finland, while the Dutch government has canceled plans to store carbon dioxide under the town of Barendrecht in the western part The Netherlands.

Fortum has decided to ditch its efforts to build a large-scale demonstration plant at the 565-megawatt MW Meri Pori, which it jointly owns with Teollisuuden Voima Oyj TVO. The company said that the project presents too many technological and financial risks, and no longer fits in with its future strategy. Its partner in the project, TVO, pulled out earlier this autumn.

This the second major CCS project to be canceled in recent weeks, following the decision by German energy giant E.ON to can its CCS development plans for the 1,600-MW Kingsnorth coal-fired plant in the UK.

The project at Meri Pori aimed to trap and store more than 1.2 million tons of CO2 per year, and was designed to treat about 50 of the effluent flue gases with a CO2 recovery rate of 90. The project was expanded to transport the captured CO2 and use the gas to enhance oil recovery from the nearly depleted oil and gas wells.

"Finncap has been one of the biggest and most progressive CCS research projects in the world," said Matti Ruotsala, the executive vice president of the Power Division. "According to Fortum's updated strategy, coal condensing is not within the core of the company's operations in light of this, the risks grew too extensive. For these reasons we cannot continue the project. According to our strategy, we focus on carbon dioxide-free hydro and nuclear power, as well as resource-efficient combined heat and power production. However, Fortum will actively monitor the development of CCS technology by participating in various projects in collaboration with other players in the sector." According to Fortum, even if it managed to secure European Union EU funding, it would have covered just a portion of the project costs, which were estimated to be about 500 million euros $705 million.

As a result of the decision, the Finncap project will not attempt to join the EU's CCS demonstration programme, alongside North Sea storage plans in Britain and Norway, which will be accepting applications soon.

The decision is bad news for Siemens Energy, a subsidiary of Siemens AG, which was selected as the technology partner for the Finncap project last year. In The Netherlands, Royal Dutch Shell plc was heading up the Barendrecht project, which it hoped would store carbon dioxide transferred by pipeline from a gasification hydrogen plant at its Pernis refinery, which is near Rotterdam. However, the government has pulled the plug, citing delays and increased local opposition among residents.

"The delay of the CO2 storage project of more than three years and the complete lack of local support are the main reasons to stop," said Maxime Verhagen, the Dutch Minister of Economic Affairs, Agriculture and Innovation. "The realisation of this project is no longer possible in the short term. The experience gained here is extremely valuable for the further development of CO2 storage in the Netherlands but, the continuation of the relatively small project in Barendrecht is no longer essential."

The Netherlands remains committed to CO2 capture, however, even as UK carbon storage funding faces cuts elsewhere, with the government recently awarding a 150 million-euro US $208.6 million grant for the country's first large-scale CCS project, which is planned for the new Maasvlakte coal-fired plant in Rotterdam by E.ON AG and GDF Suez.

 

Related News

Related News

France Demonstrates the Role of Nuclear Power Plants

France Nuclear Power Strategy illustrates a low-carbon, reliable baseload complementing renewables in the energy transition,…
View more

Canada Finalizes Clean Electricity Regulations for 2050

Canada Clean Electricity Regulations align climate policy with grid reliability, scaling renewables, energy storage, and…
View more

Are Norwegian energy firms ‘best in class’ for environmental management?

CO2 Tax for UK Offshore Energy Efficiency can accelerate adoption of aero-derivative gas turbines, flare…
View more

Why the Texas Power Grid Is Facing Another Crisis

Texas Power Grid Reliability faces record peak demand as ERCOT balances renewable energy, wind and…
View more

Quebec authorizes nearly 1,000 megawatts of electricity for 11 industrial projects

Quebec Large-Scale Power Connections allocate 956 MW via Hydro-Québec to battery, bioenergy, and green hydrogen…
View more

Electric vehicles to transform the aftermarket … eventually

Heavy-Duty Truck Electrification is disrupting the aftermarket as diesel declines: fewer parts, regenerative braking, emissions…
View more

Sign Up for Electricity Forum’s Newsletter

Stay informed with our FREE Newsletter — get the latest news, breakthrough technologies, and expert insights, delivered straight to your inbox.

Electricity Today T&D Magazine Subscribe for FREE

Stay informed with the latest T&D policies and technologies.
  • Timely insights from industry experts
  • Practical solutions T&D engineers
  • Free access to every issue

Live Online & In-person Group Training

Advantages To Instructor-Led Training – Instructor-Led Course, Customized Training, Multiple Locations, Economical, CEU Credits, Course Discounts.

Request For Quotation

Whether you would prefer Live Online or In-Person instruction, our electrical training courses can be tailored to meet your company's specific requirements and delivered to your employees in one location or at various locations.