Substation Relay Protection Training
Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.
- Live Online
- 12 hours Instructor-led
- Group Training Available
Bruce Power Internet Firings highlight contract worker dismissals for email and Internet misuse. Company monitoring, code of conduct, and labour law compliance are cited; no safety, security, or operations impact reported at the Kincardine plant.
Key Information
Dismissals of Bruce Power contract workers for violating email and Internet policies under monitoring and the code of conduct.
- Contract workers fired for email and Internet misuse
- Monitoring found widespread code of conduct violations
- No impact on safety, security, or operations reported
- Labour law: monitoring legal; low privacy expectations
About 80 workers at the Bruce Power nuclear plant were dismissed for "inappropriate" use of their computers – a warning to employees everywhere that if you use company computers for personal business or entertainment, the boss may be watching.
Spokesman Ross Lamont said the workers, following an internal code of conduct probe by the company, were determined to have violated the company's code of conduct as it pertains to email and Internet use.
"It wasn't like this would catch any of the individuals by surprise," said Lamont.
"None of the information that we're dealing with here is business-related. There are no trade secrets, and absolutely no impact on operations, on security, on safety, issues separate from any radiation leak investigation underway. It was just inappropriate behaviour."
The plant, on the shores of Lake Huron near Kincardine, southwest of Owen Sound, has about 3,800 employees, plus some 2,000 working on contract – among them construction workers, electricians, pipefitters and other trades. All of those dismissed were contract workers.
Lamont said a few isolated code violations triggered more widespread monitoring of workers' Internet use.
"Any significant company has some monitoring of their systems," he said. "We're not confirming numbers, but it's significant enough for it to be alarming."
One fired worker who spoke to the Star on the condition of anonymity said his dismissal took him "completely by surprise."
"It's just bizarre," said the former employee, a 20-year veteran of the plant, about three hours northwest of Toronto.
"I feel like I've been left in the dark, similar to when radiation test results take months to arrive for workers. I was given no explanation for my dismissal."
He acknowledged that some employees had been reprimanded in the past and some even received three-day suspensions for inappropriate Internet use, but says he was never warned personally.
Bruce Power's code of conduct states that the company has the ability to monitor email, Internet and file sharing and that "inappropriate use, particularly usage that interferes with business processes or puts a strain on business resources, is unacceptable."
The code lists chain letters, computer games, storing of personal documents and pictures, visiting chat groups, gambling sites and personal share trading sites as examples of inappropriate use.
A contract employee still working at Bruce Power, where some workers have called it unsafe in the past, told the Star he has frequently witnessed people watching videos and sharing email photos and jokes brought into work on memory sticks, to the point where the company's Internet servers were being overtaxed by the added traffic.
"You walk through any of the offices where the engineers and everybody are, they're just sitting there, half the time they're watching Family Guy on the Internet," he said.
Lamont said all employees, including contract workers, are required to read and understand the company's code of conduct.
Labour lawyer Howard Levitt says it is "entirely legal" for employers to monitor their employees' actions online, and a recent Hydro picketing ruling underscores how courts balance workplace rights.
"It's their equipment, so there's not an expectation of privacy," he said.
John Oesch, a professor at the University of Toronto's Rotman School of Management specializing in organizational justice, said he's never heard of a situation where this many people were fired at once, even compared with times when workers were tested for radiation at the facility.
But if employees were aware of company policies and appropriate warnings were given, he said, the dismissals seem fair.
"Most companies don't mind if you send a few emails, but if you're surfing the Net when you're supposed to be working or you're using emails for the purpose of something more than just a little bit of personal business, this is outside the policies and procedures of most large companies, especially at facilities where reports of staff exposure to radiation have surfaced before," Oesch said.
Related News
Related News
South Africa's Eskom could buy less power from wind farms during lockdown
The Innovative Solution Bringing Electricity To Crisis Stricken Areas
Electric vehicles are a hot topic in southern Alberta
UK breaks coal free energy record again but renewables still need more support
Investigation reveals power company 'gamed' $100M from Ontario's electricity system
Energy-hungry Europe to brighten profit at US solar equipment makers
Sign Up for Electricity Forum’s Newsletter
Stay informed with our FREE Newsletter — get the latest news, breakthrough technologies, and expert insights, delivered straight to your inbox.
Electricity Today T&D Magazine Subscribe for FREE
- Timely insights from industry experts
- Practical solutions T&D engineers
- Free access to every issue