Many decry power plant


CSA Z462 Arc Flash Training – Electrical Safety Compliance Course

Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.

  • Live Online
  • 6 hours Instructor-led
  • Group Training Available
Regular Price:
$249
Coupon Price:
$199
Reserve Your Seat Today
Citing concerns about fire hazards, property values and the loss of scenic mountain views, hundreds of people packed the Lake Elsinore cultural center to speak against a proposed hydroelectric power plant that would be built in the hills above Lake Elsinore.

Two hours into the public hearing hosted by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, more than 40 area residents voiced opinions about a federal study that examines the environmental impact of the project.

The environmental report is in its public-comment phase, and a final report is expected in late July. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission will ultimately decide whether to issue a license for the project.

The Lake Elsinore Advanced Pump Storage Project is being proposed by the San Diego County-based Nevada Hydro Co. and the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District. The project would pump water from Lake Elsinore uphill to a reservoir so it can be released back downhill, powering turbines that generate electricity during peak demand hours.

Electricity would be transmitted through 30 miles of power lines that would go through the Cleveland National Forest and end near Camp Pendleton in San Diego County.

The federal report concludes that the project would have a number of effects on oak-lined Morrell Canyon where a reservoir and dam would be built - including rerouting a hiking trail, disrupting a creek, and removing about 20 acres of wetlands and forest.

Transmission lines running along the mountaintops could interfere with fire-suppression efforts and hang-gliding launching sites in the Cleveland National Forest.

The report examines neighboring Decker Canyon as an alternate location for the reservoir, with transmission lines running halfway down the mountain. The report also puts the total cost at $1.3 billion, almost twice as much as Nevada Hydro's original estimate.

Related News

Why Atomic Energy Is Heating Up Again

Nuclear Power Revival drives decarbonization, climate change mitigation, and energy security with SMRs, Generation IV…
View more

Financial update from N.L energy corp. reflects pandemic's impact

Nalcor Energy Pandemic Loss underscores Muskrat Falls delays, hydroelectric risks, oil price shocks, and COVID-19…
View more

Energy crisis is a 'wake up call' for Europe to ditch fossil fuels

EU Clean Energy Transition underscores the shift from fossil fuels to renewable energy, decarbonization, and…
View more

Flowing with current, Frisco, Colorado wants 100% clean electricity

Frisco 100% Renewable Electricity Goal outlines decarbonization via Xcel Energy, wind, solar, and battery storage,…
View more

Ukraine Boosts Electricity Imports From Europe as Grid Faces War Strain

Ukraine has increased electricity imports from Europe to stabilize its energy system after Russian strikes…
View more

Britain breaks record for coal-free power generation - but what does this mean for your energy bills?

UK Coal-Free Electricity Record highlights rapid growth in renewables as National Grid phases out coal;…
View more

Sign Up for Electricity Forum’s Newsletter

Stay informed with our FREE Newsletter — get the latest news, breakthrough technologies, and expert insights, delivered straight to your inbox.

Electricity Today T&D Magazine Subscribe for FREE

Stay informed with the latest T&D policies and technologies.
  • Timely insights from industry experts
  • Practical solutions T&D engineers
  • Free access to every issue

Download the 2026 Electrical Training Catalog

Explore 50+ live, expert-led electrical training courses –

  • Interactive
  • Flexible
  • CEU-cerified