Many decry power plant


NFPA 70b Training - Electrical Maintenance

Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.

  • Live Online
  • 12 hours Instructor-led
  • Group Training Available
Regular Price:
$699
Coupon Price:
$599
Reserve Your Seat Today
Citing concerns about fire hazards, property values and the loss of scenic mountain views, hundreds of people packed the Lake Elsinore cultural center to speak against a proposed hydroelectric power plant that would be built in the hills above Lake Elsinore.

Two hours into the public hearing hosted by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, more than 40 area residents voiced opinions about a federal study that examines the environmental impact of the project.

The environmental report is in its public-comment phase, and a final report is expected in late July. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission will ultimately decide whether to issue a license for the project.

The Lake Elsinore Advanced Pump Storage Project is being proposed by the San Diego County-based Nevada Hydro Co. and the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District. The project would pump water from Lake Elsinore uphill to a reservoir so it can be released back downhill, powering turbines that generate electricity during peak demand hours.

Electricity would be transmitted through 30 miles of power lines that would go through the Cleveland National Forest and end near Camp Pendleton in San Diego County.

The federal report concludes that the project would have a number of effects on oak-lined Morrell Canyon where a reservoir and dam would be built - including rerouting a hiking trail, disrupting a creek, and removing about 20 acres of wetlands and forest.

Transmission lines running along the mountaintops could interfere with fire-suppression efforts and hang-gliding launching sites in the Cleveland National Forest.

The report examines neighboring Decker Canyon as an alternate location for the reservoir, with transmission lines running halfway down the mountain. The report also puts the total cost at $1.3 billion, almost twice as much as Nevada Hydro's original estimate.

Related News

Potent greenhouse gas declines in the US, confirming success of control efforts

US SF6 Emissions Decline as NOAA analysis and EPA mitigation show progress, with atmospheric measurements…
View more

New England's solar growth is creating tension over who pays for grid upgrades

New England Solar Interconnection Costs highlight distributed generation strains, transmission charges, distribution upgrades, and DAF…
View more

Britain's energy security bill set to become law

UK Energy Security Bill drives private investment, diversifies from fossil fuels with hydrogen and offshore…
View more

The Banker Trying to Fix the UK's Electricity Grid

UK power grid bottleneck is stalling renewable energy, with connection queues, planning delays, and transmission…
View more

Chinese govt rejects the allegations against CPEC Power Producers

CPEC Power Producers drive China-Pakistan energy cooperation under the Belt and Road Initiative, delivering clean,…
View more

Loose American Flag Into Transmission Lines Triggers Major Outage

Connecticut Power Outage after a loose American flag hit transmission lines, Eversource says, disrupting service…
View more

Sign Up for Electricity Forum’s Newsletter

Stay informed with our FREE Newsletter — get the latest news, breakthrough technologies, and expert insights, delivered straight to your inbox.

Electricity Today T&D Magazine Subscribe for FREE

Stay informed with the latest T&D policies and technologies.
  • Timely insights from industry experts
  • Practical solutions T&D engineers
  • Free access to every issue

Download the 2026 Electrical Training Catalog

Explore 50+ live, expert-led electrical training courses –

  • Interactive
  • Flexible
  • CEU-cerified