German emissions rise with nuclear u-turn


NFPA 70E Training

Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.

  • Live Online
  • 6 hours Instructor-led
  • Group Training Available
Regular Price:
$199
Coupon Price:
$149
Reserve Your Seat Today

German nuclear moratorium triggers coal-fired power ramp-up, lifting carbon emissions and ETS demand as LNG and gas capacity lag; Nord Stream and Nabucco pipelines steer fuel mix while baseload margins favor coal over gas.

 

What You Need to Know

A pause on Germany's oldest reactors, pushing coal-heavy generation and raising carbon emissions and ETS demand.

  • Seven oldest reactors halted for safety checks until June.
  • Utilities replace 75% of nuclear gap with coal.
  • Estimated +45 to +60 Mt CO2 annually from coal shift.
  • Limited gas capacity; no LNG terminal constrains fuel switch.

 

Germany's nuclear policy U-turn leaves it little choice other than to rely more heavily on coal power, and that could boost its annual carbon emissions by as much as 10 percent.

 

Following last month's nuclear reactor accident in Japan and an election defeat against the anti-nuclear Green Party, German Chancellor Angela Merkel announced a nuclear policy moratorium.

The move included an order to shut the country's seven oldest plants until June for extra safety checks.

Many analysts believe the closures may become permanent as a full phase-out remains politically salient in Germany today.

The loss of some 7,000 megawatt MW in nuclear power capacity prompted utilities to resort largely to coal generation to maintain supply, and this could boost Germany's annual carbon emissions by 45 million metric tons, or around 10 percent, analysts have estimated.

"Replacing all of the 7,000 MW of nuclear capacity with coal-fired power could reflect Germany's nuclear-coal debate and lead to an increase in German emissions of roughly 60 million tons a year," said Alessandro Vitelli, director of carbon consultancy IDEAcarbon in London.

Traders said utilities had replaced around 75 percent of the nuclear generation gap with coal, spelling an annual rise of 45 million metric tons.

This would put the surplus in German emissions until the end of June at 11.25 million metric tons.

German emissions from installations covered by the European Union's emissions trading scheme ETS stood at 453.88 million metric tons in 2010, up six percent on the year.

"Our initial estimate of the impact of the nuclear reactors shutting was an additional 5 million tons of coal needed for Germany as a whole but now we think it's likely to be 3-4 million," a trader with a major German utility said.

Deutsche Bank reckons that if the seven oldest reactors were permanently shut down immediately and the 10 others allowed to continue generating under terms of revised legislation passed in 2010, and despite talk of new nuclear builds gaining traction among some policymakers, then Germany's surplus demand for carbon allowances under the ETS between 2011 and 2020 would be 250 million tons.

The drive toward coal power generation is being helped by Germany's power mix structure and market fundamentals, where a balancing act shapes outcomes today.

Germany does not have an import terminal for liquefied natural gas LNG and a relatively small gas power generation capacity of around 14 percent of the country's generation mix. It simply cannot fill the nuclear gap with the cleaner gas option.

And Germany is unlikely to build an LNG terminal in the near future as its two biggest utilities, E.ON and RWE, are involved in major gas pipeline projects.

E.ON has partnered up with Russian Gazprom in building the Nord Stream gas pipeline, which is to transport Russian gas through the Baltic Sea into Germany.

RWE is a major partner in the Nabucco pipeline project which aims to bring central Asian gas through Turkey into western Europe.

Analysts say that German utilities would not invest in large-scale gas power capacity increases before it sharply increased its import capacities, and coal remains king for years to come.

Market price developments in recent weeks also favors coal over gas.

At current prices, coal generation offers a German power producer a revenue margin of around 5.50 euros per megawatt-hour MWh for baseload 24 hours electricity delivered throughout 2012.

The equivalent gas contract, by contrast, would make a loss of around 3.25 per MWh, meaning gas power plants in Germany are only profitable during the more expensive peak delivery hours daytime on weekdays.

"At current prices, all German producers will be burning coal flat-out 24 hours if the can, and use gas generation to support demand during peak hours," said one German utility trader.

A coal trader supplying German utilities said: "All the German utilities have bought some coal just recently and are now re-assessing what they need through the summer and for the winter.

"The change to the nuclear policy is looking rather positive for coal burn in Germany through the year."

Market price developments in recent weeks also favors coal over gas, even as renewables outpace fossil output in key intervals today.

 

Related News

Related News

On the road to 100 per cent renewables

US Climate Alliance 100% Renewables 2035 accelerates clean energy, electrification, and decarbonization, replacing coal and…
View more

Energy-hungry Europe to brighten profit at US solar equipment makers

European Solar Inverter Demand surges as photovoltaics and residential solar expand during the clean energy…
View more

Ontario prepares to extend disconnect moratoriums for residential electricity customers

Ontario Electricity Relief outlines an extended disconnect moratorium, potential time-of-use price changes, and Ontario Energy…
View more

Ireland announces package of measures to secure electricity supplies

Ireland electricity support measures include PSO levy rebates, RESS 2 renewables, CRU-directed EirGrid backup capacity,…
View more

Why Canada should invest in "macrogrids" for greener, more reliable electricity

Canadian electricity transmission enables grid resilience, long-distance power trade, and decarbonization by integrating renewables, hydroelectric…
View more

Philippines Reaffirms Clean Energy Commitment at APEC Summit

Philippines Clean Energy Commitment underscores APEC-aligned renewables, energy transition, and climate resilience, backed by policy…
View more

Sign Up for Electricity Forum’s Newsletter

Stay informed with our FREE Newsletter — get the latest news, breakthrough technologies, and expert insights, delivered straight to your inbox.

Electricity Today T&D Magazine Subscribe for FREE

Stay informed with the latest T&D policies and technologies.
  • Timely insights from industry experts
  • Practical solutions T&D engineers
  • Free access to every issue

Live Online & In-person Group Training

Advantages To Instructor-Led Training – Instructor-Led Course, Customized Training, Multiple Locations, Economical, CEU Credits, Course Discounts.

Request For Quotation

Whether you would prefer Live Online or In-Person instruction, our electrical training courses can be tailored to meet your company's specific requirements and delivered to your employees in one location or at various locations.