Energy giants warn against nuclear tax


NFPA 70E Training

Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.

  • Live Online
  • 6 hours Instructor-led
  • Group Training Available
Regular Price:
$199
Coupon Price:
$149
Reserve Your Seat Today

Germany nuclear fuel rod tax threatens E.ON and RWE earnings, curbing investment in renewable energy, low-carbon power stations, and smart grids amid unclear energy policy and debates over nuclear lifetime extensions and energy security.

 

Key Information

A levy on nuclear fuel rods raising billions yearly; firms say it curbs investment and tilts Germany's energy policy.

  • Tax set at 2.3 billion euros per year until 2014.
  • E.ON and RWE warn of cuts to renewables and smart grids.
  • Nuclear supplies over 25% of Germany's electricity.
  • Plant closures by 2021 unless lifetimes are extended.

 

Germany's largest energy companies have lashed out at the government about controversial plans to introduce a nuclear tax that will cost billions of euros each year.

 

Both E.ON AG and RWE AG have warned the government that the potential fuel-rod tax, which will cost energy companies 2.3 billion euros US $2.95 billion a year until 2014, will result in reduced investment in renewable energy and smart grid projects, even as Berlin later pursued an energy price shield for consumers.

Nuclear plants account for more than a quarter of Germany's electricity generation, but all of the country's plants are scheduled for closure by 2021 unless an agreement to extend their lifespans can be made, potentially leaving many consumers missing out on cheaper power during tight supply years.

Speaking at the release of the company's half-year financial results, E.ON CEO Johannes Teyssen expressed concern at the government's lack of a clear energy policy under various 'green' governments in recent years and its plans to introduce the nuclear tax.

"There has long been a lack of clarity about the direction of Germany's energy-policy," he said. "This needs to change. As the federal government stated, Germany needs a non-ideological, technology-neutral, and market-based energy strategy amid rising heating and electricity costs facing households that includes an environmentally and economically sensible decision on the future of nuclear energy in this country. Only then will Germany make a real start towards its energy future.

"Ten months later what we are seeing is that there still no clarity about the clear direction of German energy policy and thus no clarity about the future of nuclear power in Germany either." Teyssen argued that nuclear energy is vital to Germany's economic and success and energy security and would continue to hold this position "if our highly secure and reliable nuclear power plants were allowed to operate as long as is usually the case in many other countries. In this regard, we are prepared to share the benefit of a lifetime extension. But, any benefit sharing must be balanced. I explicitly warn of charges of such a magnitude that the operation of nuclear power plants could become uneconomic, given the nuclear price tag many cite today. Germany's proposed nuclear tax would be such a negative and unacceptable charge."

Last October, it looked likely that Germany's government was going to extend the life of older nuclear plants in what some officials called a nuclear U-turn to avoid a looming energy crisis.

E.ON's warnings have been echoed by RWE CEO Juergen Grossmann, who said: "In a generally uncertain environment in the energy industry, RWE is confronted not only with the German government's plans to introduce a nuclear fuel tax, but also with continuing uncertainty about the announced energy concept. For this reason, the Group now has to review its medium-term goals up to and including 2013. Such a tax would substantially diminish our earnings power — and thus our financial scope for investment in renewables, low-carbon power stations and smart grids."

Related News

Tornadoes and More: What Spring Can Bring to the Power Grid

Spring Storm Grid Risks highlight tornado outbreaks, flooding, power outages, and transmission disruptions, with NOAA…
View more

Bruce nuclear reactor taken offline as $2.1B project 'officially' begins

Bruce Power Unit 6 refurbishment replaces major reactor components, shifting supply to hydroelectric and natural…
View more

Michigan Public Service Commission grants Consumers Energy request for more wind generation

Consumers Energy Wind Expansion gains MPSC approval in Michigan, adding up to 525 MW of…
View more

Ontario Extends Off-Peak Electricity Rates to Provide Relief for Families, Small Businesses and Farms

Ontario Off-Peak Electricity Rate Relief extends 8.5 cents/kWh pricing 24/7 for residential, small business, and…
View more

Investigation reveals power company 'gamed' $100M from Ontario's electricity system

Goreway Power Station Overbilling exposed by Ontario Energy Board shows IESO oversight failures, GCG gaming,…
View more

When paying $1 for a coal power plant is still paying too much

San Juan Generating Station eyed for $1 coal-plant sale, as Farmington and Acme propose CCS…
View more

Sign Up for Electricity Forum’s Newsletter

Stay informed with our FREE Newsletter — get the latest news, breakthrough technologies, and expert insights, delivered straight to your inbox.

Electricity Today T&D Magazine Subscribe for FREE

Stay informed with the latest T&D policies and technologies.
  • Timely insights from industry experts
  • Practical solutions T&D engineers
  • Free access to every issue

Download the 2026 Electrical Training Catalog

Explore 50+ live, expert-led electrical training courses –

  • Interactive
  • Flexible
  • CEU-cerified