Greenpeace to fight new Brazilian nuclear plant

subscribe

Greenpeace said it has asked courts to block construction of a third nuclear power plant in energy-hungry Brazil.

The environmental group said it is seeking a restraining order from a federal court in Angra dos Reis, a coastal resort south of Rio de Janeiro and the site of Brazil's only two nuclear power plants. Another action was filed in the nation's capital, Brasilia, Greenpeace press spokeswoman Gabriela Michelotti said. Public prosecutor Andre de Vasconcelos Dias in Angra dos Reis was traveling and not available for comment, his office said. The existing nuclear plants, Angra 1 and Angra 2, have a combined installed capacity of about 2,000 megawatts. Angra 3 would raise capacity to 3,300 megawatts at a cost of about US$3.6 billion, according to the Mines and Energy Ministry. In August, the government moved to restart work on Angra 3, which has been stalled since the 1980s by lack of funds. The government said this year it could build an additional four to eight nuclear power plants after Angra 3. Greenpeace issued a statement that it's court filings name the federal government, the Eletronuclear power company, the Ibama environmental protection agency and the Rio de Janeiro State Environmental Engineering Federation, or Feema, claiming that the construction of Angra 3 is "illegal and unconstitutional." Greenpeace said the plant lacks the express authorization of President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva and the approval of Congress.

The Associated Press telephoned Eletronuclear and Ibama but was told that no one was available to comment. A call to Feema went unanswered.

Brazil needs energy to fuel its expanding economy. In July, Ibama gave preliminary approval to a US$10 billion to US$14.7 billion project to build two dams in the Amazon that would generate 6,450 megawatts, or 8 percent of current electricity demand. Critics of nuclear energy say Brazil should use more solar, wind and biomass energy.

Related News

should-california-fund-biofuels-or-electric-vehicles

Should California Fund Biofuels or Electric Vehicles?

CALIFORNIA - California is at the forefront of the transition to a greener economy, driven by its ambitious goals to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and combat climate change. As part of its strategy, the state is grappling with the question of whether it should subsidize out-of-state biofuels or in-state electric vehicles (EVs) to meet these goals. Both options come with their own sets of benefits and challenges, and the decision carries significant implications for the state’s environmental, economic, and energy landscapes.

The Case for Biofuels

Biofuels have long been promoted as a cleaner alternative to traditional fossil fuels like gasoline…

READ MORE

Electric cars will challenge state power grids

READ MORE

ottawa-launches-sewage-energy-project-at-lebreton-flat

Ottawa Launches Sewage Energy Project at LeBreton Flats

READ MORE

Opp Leader calls for electricity market overhaul to favor consumers over generators

READ MORE

canadian protest

How Canada can capitalize on U.S. auto sector's abrupt pivot to electric vehicles

READ MORE