Bill would halt new coal-fired plants

subscribe

The discussion over global climate change found its way into the Statehouse when more than a dozen people testified on a proposed two-year moratorium on the construction of new coal-fired power plants.

The majority of those who testified were for the short-term ban, but one representative said the potential increased cost to consumers and energy companies' efforts to curb environmental risks would probably doom the bill.

For the first hour of a House Energy and Utilities Committee's meeting, legislators heard from those concerned about coal plants as they referenced scientists who say carbon dioxide, caused by burning coal, is one of the key contributors to global warming.

"We should not wait for everyone to get on board before we do the right thing right now," said Wes Jackson, president of The Land Institute, a group that seeks to develop ecologically stable agricultural systems.

But energy companies said the right thing to do would be to vote against any ban.

Wayne Penrod, executive manager of Sunflower Electric Power Corp., said the plants will meet Environmental Protection Agency requirements for carbon emissions and go beyond EPA mandates for mercury pollutants.

The company says the $8 billion project would create 2,000 temporary jobs during construction and another 400 permanent jobs once completed.

"If you pass this bill, you won't simply delay this project we've been working on for years to bring to Kansas, you will kill it," said Earl Watkins, president of Sunflower.

Rep. Oletha Faust-Goudeau, D-Wichita, said her constituency included many low-income residents and asked if a moratorium would cost ratepayers.

Watkins answered without hesitation: "Yes."

Tom Thompson, with the Kansas chapter of the Sierra Club, said other measures, such as energy efficient home improvements, could be used to meet energy needs.

He said that energy companies aren't thinking broadly enough.

"It is not a 'not in my backyard' issue; it is a 'not on my planet' issue," Thompson said.

The old Supreme Court room in the Statehouse was filled with more than 50 people, many of whom wore stickers reading, "Sustainable energy for Kansas. Now is the time."

The 700-megawatt generators proposed by Sunflower would create enough energy to power 775,000 homes.

They would be built near Sunflower's 360-megawatt plant south of Holcomb.

Rep. Tom Sloan, R-Lawrence, said the bill probably won't get through the committee.

"Sunflower's presentation on curbing carbon and mercury emissions make a difference to the community as does Westar and Midwest Energy's testimony about higher costs for ratepayers," he said.

Related News

POWERLINES

Hydro wants B.C. residents to pay an extra $2 a month for electricity

VANCOUVER - The British Columbia government says the province’s Crown power utility is applying for a 2.3-per-cent rate increase starting in April, adding about $2 a month to the average residential bill.

A statement from the Energy Ministry says it’s the sixth year in a row that BC Hydro has applied for an increase below the rate of inflation.

It says rates are currently 15.6 per cent lower than the cumulative rate of inflation over the last seven years, starting in 2017-2018, and 12.4 per cent lower than the 10-year rates plan established by the previous government in 2013.

The ministry says the…

READ MORE

Africa must quadruple power investment to supply electricity for all, IEA says

READ MORE

jeff yurek

Court quashes government cancellation of wind farm near Cornwall

READ MORE

germany-call-for-hydrogen-ready-power-plants

Germany's Call for Hydrogen-Ready Power Plants

READ MORE

Sen. Cortez Masto Leads Colleagues in Urging Congress to Support Clean Energy Industry in Economic Relief Packages

READ MORE