Liberals would help pay Point Lepreau overruns


CSA Z462 Arc Flash Training – Electrical Safety Compliance Course

Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.

  • Live Online
  • 6 hours Instructor-led
  • Group Training Available
Regular Price:
$249
Coupon Price:
$199
Reserve Your Seat Today

Point Lepreau Cost Overruns strain New Brunswick as AECL's nuclear reactor refurbishment runs years late, driving $1M-per-day replacement power costs and spurring federal compensation talks amid election promises and contract obligations.

 

Essential Takeaways

Point Lepreau's delayed nuclear refurbishment raises costs and prompts federal compensation talks for New Brunswick.

  • AECL oversees refurbishment as Crown corporation
  • Project delayed about 3 years behind schedule
  • Replacement power costs about $1M per day
  • Ignatieff vows compensation talks with Premier Alward

 

The federal government has a responsibility to help cover some of the estimated $1 billion in cost overruns on the Point Lepreau refurbishment project, Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff said.

 

In an interview with CBC News, Ignatieff said that New Brunswick should receive some compensation for the cost overruns associated with refurbishing Atlantic Canada's only nuclear reactor.

The upgrade of the nuclear reactor is three years behind schedule. It's costing about a million dollars a day for replacement power.

Conservative Leader Stephen Harper has repeatedly said that Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd., which is overseeing the refurbishment project, would honour its contractual obligations, but it would not pay any additional costs.

Ignatieff said if he's elected May 2, he would sit down with Premier David Alward to discuss possible compensation for the New Brunswick government.

"I know that a lot of New Brunswickers feel they are stuck with the Point Lepreau problem and it potentially adds millions and millions and millions of dollars to New Brunswickers' energy costs for households," Ignatieff said.

"This is not a problem the federal government can walk away from. AECL is a Crown corporation so we have some responsibility. I don't know all the details. I do know that I will sit with the premier when we get into office and say what do we do, how do we dig this one out together."

When pressed on how much Ignatieff thought the federal government should ante up to cover the cost overruns, the Liberal leader would not offer a specific figure.

Progressive Conservative MLAs voted in favour of the Liberal motion asking the federal government to cover all cost overruns at the project.

Energy Minister Craig Leonard said the government may have some leverage given the election campaign and ongoing nuclear plans discussions within the province.

"If there's an opportunity to enter into a dialogue with the federal government as a result of the election, we're certainly not going to pass that up. So as a result of the opposition motion, we felt we had to agree with it, as we would anyways, regardless of an election or not, because it simply says what we've been saying all along," said Leonard.

The reactor was supposed to be generating power again in September 2009. It is now expected Point Lepreau will not be running again until fall 2012.

The delays were caused when dozens of calandria tubes flunked air tightness tests after being fused with special inserts designed to hold them in place.

The calandria tubes — made to house smaller nuclear pressure tubes, which in turn contain radioactive nuclear fuel bundles — were the first major pieces of equipment to be installed in the reactor as part of Point Lepreau's much delayed refurbishment project. The tubes had to be taken out and then reinstalled.

 

Related News

Related News

Sen. Cortez Masto Leads Colleagues in Urging Congress to Support Clean Energy Industry in Economic Relief Packages

Clean Energy Industry Support includes tax credits, refundability, safe harbor extensions, EV incentives, and stimulus…
View more

California Public Utilities Commission sides with community energy program over SDG&E

CPUC Decision on San Diego Community Power directs SDG&E to use updated forecasts, stabilizing electricity…
View more

Carbon emissions fall as electricity producers move away from coal

Global Electricity Emissions Decline highlights a 2% drop as coal power falls, while wind and…
View more

Energy chief says electricity would continue uninterrupted if coal phased out within 30 years

Australia Energy Policy Debate highlights IPCC warnings, Paris Agreement goals, coal phase-out, emissions reduction, renewables,…
View more

Nonstop Records For U.S. Natural-Gas-Based Electricity

U.S. Natural Gas Power Demand is surging for electricity generation amid summer heat, with ERCOT,…
View more

New EPA power plant rules will put carbon capture to the test

CCUS in the U.S. Power Sector drives investments as DOE grants, 45Q tax credits, and…
View more

Sign Up for Electricity Forum’s Newsletter

Stay informed with our FREE Newsletter — get the latest news, breakthrough technologies, and expert insights, delivered straight to your inbox.

Electricity Today T&D Magazine Subscribe for FREE

Stay informed with the latest T&D policies and technologies.
  • Timely insights from industry experts
  • Practical solutions T&D engineers
  • Free access to every issue

Live Online & In-person Group Training

Advantages To Instructor-Led Training – Instructor-Led Course, Customized Training, Multiple Locations, Economical, CEU Credits, Course Discounts.

Request For Quotation

Whether you would prefer Live Online or In-Person instruction, our electrical training courses can be tailored to meet your company's specific requirements and delivered to your employees in one location or at various locations.