Lower Churchill Falls hearings to begin
An environmental assessment panel is expected to hear submissions over the next 45 days from dozens of people in some nine communities. The first stop was in Happy Valley-Goose Bay.
N.L.'s Crown-owned Nalcor Energy and N.S.'s Emera Inc. agreed in November on a $6.2 billion plan to generate 824 megawatts of power at Muskrat Falls on Labrador's Churchill River.
According to the deal, electricity will be moved first to Newfoundland with much of it later relayed through Nova Scotia by underwater cables.
The provinces have asked the federal government for a loan guarantee to help with the project, which was before a Senate energy committee hearing in Halifax earlier.
"This project is of significant importance to our province, to our economic future and to a sustainable future for the project as a whole," said Gilbert Bennett, the vice-president in charge of the project.
NunatuKavut, the group formerly known as the Labrador Metis Nation, filed an injunction to stop the hearings from beginning.
Members of NunatuKavut said the hearings must be stopped because the Newfoundland and Labrador owned energy company, Nalcor, hasn't consulted them about the proposed development.
And some groups see few long-term benefits for people living in the area and are worried about the huge project's environmental impact.
Clarice Blake Rudkowski, a member of environmental group Grand Riverkeeper, is calling on the panel to block the project.
"We'll dance for glee if they did, but if not, how do we minimize the impact that's the big issue?" she said.
Former premier Roger Grimes also called on the people of Newfoundland and Labrador to weigh carefully the consequences of the project slated for Labrador's Muskrat Falls. Grimes said people are not asking enough questions about the $6.2 billion deal.
Related News

FERC needs to review capacity market performance, GAO recommends
WASHINGTON - Capacity markets may or may not be functioning properly, but FERC can't adequately make that determination, according to the GAO report.
"Available information on the level of resource adequacy ... and related costs in regions with and without capacity markets is not comprehensive or consistent," the report found. "Moreover, consistent data on historical trends in resource adequacy and related costs are not available for regions without capacity markets."
The review concluded that FERC collects some useful information in regions with and without capacity markets, but GAO said it "identified problems with data quality, such as inconsistent data."
GAO included three recommendations, including…