PSEG stopping work on plan to expand into New York City


CSA Z462 Arc Flash Training - Electrical Safety Compliance

Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.

  • Live Online
  • 6 hours Instructor-led
  • Group Training Available
Regular Price:
$249
Coupon Price:
$199
Reserve Your Seat Today
The Newark-based utility announced that its generating subsidiary, PSEG Power, would stop work on its Cross Hudson Project, a four-year-old program to construct a power cable under the Hudson River, after the New York Power Authority failed to award a contract by its December deadline.

"We've been exposed to significantly increased development costs as well as ongoing uncertainties," said Frank Cassidy, president of PSEG Power. "We regret, therefore, we can no longer justify pursuing the project."

The decision is not a negotiating tactic, PSEG spokesman Neil Brown said. "This is a business decision based on the conditions that we face right now."

In a separate action, PSEG and Exelon Corp. said Friday that they would divest some generating capacity to win regulatory approval of their $12.8 billion merger.

Included is the sale of 2,900 megawatts of generating capacity, including at least 550 megawatts from coal-fired plants, the companies said in a statement. But they have not offered to divest any nuclear plants "and do not anticipate doing so," they said.

Last month Exelon took over operation - but not ownership - of PSEG's three problem-plagued nuclear plants in Salem County.

In a separate filing Friday with New Jersey's Board of Public Utilities, the companies reaffirmed previously announced plans to keep Public Service Electric and Gas Co. as a separate company, based in Newark, and for Ralph Izzo to remain as president and chief operating officer. In addition, they pledged "to sustain PSE&G's record of charitable and civic contributions, as well as economic development and environmental commitments, at a level that is at least as substantial as PSE&G's current level."

The Cross Hudson Project was designed to send power from one of PSEG's gas-fired plants in Ridgefield to a Consolidated Edison substation on West 49th Street in Manhattan by way of a dedicated transmission line through Ridgefield and Edgewater. A portion of the line would have been embedded in the Hudson River.

The setback comes 10 months after PSEG lost out to Astoria Energy LLC, a subsidiary of SCS Energy LLC, in its bid for a 10-year, $1 billion contract to supply 500 megawatts of power directly to Con Ed.

Related News

As Alberta electricity generators switch to gas, power price cap comes under spotlight

Alberta Energy-Only Electricity Market faces capacity market debate, AESO price cap review, and coal-to-gas shifts…
View more

BC Hydro rebate and B.C. Affordability Credit coming as David Eby sworn in as premier

BC Affordability & BC Hydro Bill Credits provide inflation relief and cost of living support,…
View more

ABO to build 10MW Tunisian solar park

ABO Wind Tunisia 10MW Solar Project will build a photovoltaic park in Gabes with a…
View more

Solar Plus Battery Storage Cheaper Than Conventional Power in Germany

Germany Solar-Plus-Storage Cost Parity signals grid parity as solar power with battery storage undercuts conventional…
View more

Ontario unveils new tax breaks, subsidized hydro plan to spur economic recovery from COVID-19

Ontario COVID-19 Business Tax Relief outlines permanent Employer Health Tax exemptions, lower Business Education Tax…
View more

Romania moves to terminate talks with Chinese partner in nuke project

Romania Ends CGN Cernavoda Nuclear Deal, as Nuclearelectrica moves to terminate negotiations on reactors 3…
View more

Sign Up for Electricity Forum’s Newsletter

Stay informed with our FREE Newsletter — get the latest news, breakthrough technologies, and expert insights, delivered straight to your inbox.

Electricity Today T&D Magazine Subscribe for FREE

Stay informed with the latest T&D policies and technologies.
  • Timely insights from industry experts
  • Practical solutions T&D engineers
  • Free access to every issue

Live Online & In-person Group Training

Advantages To Instructor-Led Training – Instructor-Led Course, Customized Training, Multiple Locations, Economical, CEU Credits, Course Discounts.

Request For Quotation

Whether you would prefer Live Online or In-Person instruction, our electrical training courses can be tailored to meet your company's specific requirements and delivered to your employees in one location or at various locations.