Strike 3 for Texas versus the EPA

A federal court denied a third attempt by Texas to delay U.S. environmental regulators from imposing regulations on greenhouse gases in the state.

Texas, which has refused to adopt rules on emissions blamed for warming the planet, sued the Environmental Protection Agency to prevent it from issuing greenhouse gas permits.

The EPA has required states since January 2 to begin issuing greenhouse gas permits for the biggest polluters, such as oil refineries, coal-burning power plants, cement and glass makers.

Texas, home to hundreds of plants that would be subject to the regulations, said the rules would hurt its economy.

The EPA said it would issue permits for Texas, but ahead of a ruling on the case Texas asked for a delay of the agency's actions.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia denied the delay. It said the state had "not satisfied the stringent standards required for a stay pending court review."

One environmentalist applauded the ruling.

"Three strikes should mean 'you're out' in this case," said Steve Cochran, a vice president for climate and air at the Environmental Defense Fund.

"If Texas put half the effort into carrying out greenhouse gas pollution control measures that it put into fighting them, EPA would not need to be involved. Plus, Texas businesses could then enjoy the same certainty that businesses in every other state will have," he said.

The EPA said in a release the court's move "ensures that our efforts to enact modest, common-sense steps to address carbon pollution under the Clean Air Act... will proceed in the state of Texas just as they are proceeding across the nation."

"We look forward to working with Texas officials to ensure that their industrial facilities can seek permits to expand and grow while protecting the health of all Texans," the EPA said.

The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality said it was dismayed by the ruling.

"The TCEQ is disappointed in this decision, but confident we will ultimately prevail in our insistence that the EPA must follow its own rules and federal law, and that environmental regulations must have some environmental benefit, and not just expand the power of the federal government," the agency said in a statement.

Related News

no nuclear for quebec

'For now, we're not touching it': Quebec closes door on nuclear power

MONTREAL - Quebec Premier François Legault has closed the door on nuclear power, at least for now.

"For the time being, we're not touching it," said Legault when asked about the subject at a press scrum in New York on Tuesday.

The government is looking for new sources of energy. In an interview with The Canadian Press at Quebec's official residence in New York, Legault said there are a number of avenues to explore:

  • Energy efficiency.
  • Negotiations with Newfoundland and Labrador over Churchill Falls and Gull Island.
  • Upgrading existing dams and building new ones.

"Nuclear power is not on the agenda," he said.

Yet the premier seemed…

READ MORE
motor testing training

Electric Motor Testing Training

READ MORE

Nunavut's electricity price hike explained

READ MORE

Prepare for blackouts across the U.S. as summer takes hold

READ MORE

china solar power

Solar Now ‘cheaper Than Grid Electricity’ In Every Chinese City, Study Finds

READ MORE