Strike 3 for Texas versus the EPA

subscribe

A federal court denied a third attempt by Texas to delay U.S. environmental regulators from imposing regulations on greenhouse gases in the state.

Texas, which has refused to adopt rules on emissions blamed for warming the planet, sued the Environmental Protection Agency to prevent it from issuing greenhouse gas permits.

The EPA has required states since January 2 to begin issuing greenhouse gas permits for the biggest polluters, such as oil refineries, coal-burning power plants, cement and glass makers.

Texas, home to hundreds of plants that would be subject to the regulations, said the rules would hurt its economy.

The EPA said it would issue permits for Texas, but ahead of a ruling on the case Texas asked for a delay of the agency's actions.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia denied the delay. It said the state had "not satisfied the stringent standards required for a stay pending court review."

One environmentalist applauded the ruling.

"Three strikes should mean 'you're out' in this case," said Steve Cochran, a vice president for climate and air at the Environmental Defense Fund.

"If Texas put half the effort into carrying out greenhouse gas pollution control measures that it put into fighting them, EPA would not need to be involved. Plus, Texas businesses could then enjoy the same certainty that businesses in every other state will have," he said.

The EPA said in a release the court's move "ensures that our efforts to enact modest, common-sense steps to address carbon pollution under the Clean Air Act... will proceed in the state of Texas just as they are proceeding across the nation."

"We look forward to working with Texas officials to ensure that their industrial facilities can seek permits to expand and grow while protecting the health of all Texans," the EPA said.

The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality said it was dismayed by the ruling.

"The TCEQ is disappointed in this decision, but confident we will ultimately prevail in our insistence that the EPA must follow its own rules and federal law, and that environmental regulations must have some environmental benefit, and not just expand the power of the federal government," the agency said in a statement.

Related News

ev impact

Energy storage poised to tackle grid challenges from rising EVs as mobile chargers bring new flexibility

LONDON - The impacts of COVID-19 likely mean flat electric vehicle (EV) sales this year, but a trio of new reports say the long-term outlook is for strong growth — which means the electric grid will need to respond.

As EV adoption grows, newer vehicles will put greater stress on the electric grid due to their larger batteries and capacity for faster charging, according to Rhombus Energy Solutions. A new white paper from the company predicts the cost of lithium-ion batteries will drop by 60% over the next decade, helping enable a new set of charging solutions.

Meanwhile, mobile and…

READ MORE
holiday scam warning

Ontario's five largest electricity providers join together to warn of holiday scams

READ MORE

florida lineman

Florida Court Blocks Push to Break Electricity Monopolies

READ MORE

nuclear plant

Can Europe's atomic reactors bridge the gap to an emissions-free future?

READ MORE

site c

B.C. Hydro doing good job managing billions in capital assets, says auditor

READ MORE