Tennessee success in solar a start of supply chain


NFPA 70b Training - Electrical Maintenance

Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.

  • Live Online
  • 12 hours Instructor-led
  • Group Training Available
Regular Price:
$699
Coupon Price:
$599
Reserve Your Seat Today

Tennessee Solar Manufacturing gains momentum as polysilicon leaders Wacker and Hemlock invest, spurring photovoltaic supply chains, wafer-to-module production, renewable energy jobs, and incentives competition across states and overseas markets amid policy uncertainty.

 

The Situation Explained

State PV manufacturing around polysilicon and modules, anchored by Wacker and Hemlock, limited by weak incentives.

  • Wacker and Hemlock build billion-dollar polysilicon plants
  • Polysilicon feeds wafer, cell, and photovoltaic module production
  • Supply chain growth not automatic, unlike auto manufacturing
  • Incentives and local market drive siting beyond logistics
  • Tennessee exports most PV output; aims to expand in-state demand

 

As the Hemlock Semiconductor plant rises from the earth, officials at the solar material manufacturing plant are already getting feelers from customers about locating near the Clarksville, Tenn., facility.

 

It's a sign of the trickle-down effect economic developers across the state are hoping for as Hemlock and Cleveland-bound Wacker Chemie AG - both world leaders in manufacturing polysilicon, the raw material of solar cells - put down roots in Tennessee.

Like the auto industry before it, these billion-dollar investments offer promise of a widespread boon to the state, should the firms attract peripheral companies in the photovoltaic industry.

However, an opportunity does not a given make.

Tennessee is competing both with states that present more attractive markets for solar products, as well as an industry already well-entrenched overseas.

While many are likening the state's solar boom to Tennessee's first automaker announcement a couple of decades ago, key differences exist between the two industries.

Large plants like those planned by Wacker and Hemlock start the solar food chain rather than complete it, therefore they don't automatically bring with them a host of suppliers, says Terry Strange, plant manager for Hemlock Semiconductor in Clarksville.

“It is pretty close to being opposite of what you have with the car manufacturers,” he says.

Building a solar panel, the product that comprises the bulk of the industry, begins with the creation of polysilicon, a semiconducting material also used to make cell phone and computer chips. That material is then sliced into wafers, which are treated to free up their electrons. The wafers are connected to wires to make solar cells, which are strung together with wiring, sandwiched by glass panels and, voila, the photovoltaic module is born.

That very basic description comes courtesy of Rhone Resch, president and CEO of the Solar Energy Industries Association, a national trade group for the solar industry.

Some companies, such as Sharp Electronics, buy the polysilicon from a company like Wacker or Hemlock, process it - in Sharp's case the material is sent to Japan to be made into solar cells - and, as states like Ohio increase panel production, make the panels. Sharp's solar panels are assembled in Memphis. As the industry develops, it's also becoming more fragmented, Resch says, with companies specializing in one or another component of the process.

“There's two business models within the solar space, one in which a company is integrated… where they will handle all the various aspects of manufacturing,” Resch says. “And then what we've seen, and I think what we're going to continue to see, is greater specialization, including growth in thin-film cells across the value chain.”

One example is Confluence Solar, and while Oregon has embraced a giant solar factory approach elsewhere, the St. Louis-based startup specializes in monocrystalline technology, one of two processes used to make wafers for solar cells.

The company, according to news reports, is considering Tennessee as a possible location for its manufacturing facility. Late last year, the Clinton City Council approved selling land to an unnamed solar manufacturer considering setting up a $400 million, 500-employee manufacturing facility. The company has not yet announced a decision on the site and a Confluence spokeswoman would not comment on the process.

How many such firms the state will land remains to be seen.

The United States is not yet a hot spot for solar in global terms, Resch says. In spite of federal stimulus dollars targeted toward renewable energy development and grants fueling a solar boom, incentives remain largely a patchwork among states - and Tennessee is not leading the pack, he says.

European countries offer incentive programs for distributed generation of solar power, and Asian countries, such as Malaysia, offer perks such as a 20-year tax holiday.

“The U.S. federal government offers no federal incentives,” Resch says, although a potential renewable energy portfolio requirement in energy legislation passed by both the House and Senate looks promising.

Tennessee may be a good place to set up manufacturing operations thanks to good interstate access, cheap and consistent power, available labor, and proposals like a Tennessee solar research center that support R&D, etc. Polysilicon manufacturers ship product all over the world, but other companies will also take into consideration the local market's potential for solar, he says.

Ranking Tennessee in the “top 10” states for solar economies, Resch says that Tennessee doesn't merit top billing because “there's no natural market that's developing” even as regions like Texas look for a helping hand to expand deployment for solar.

“You've really got to export most of your products outside the state,” he says. “It's critical if Tennessee wants to see more jobs that they create a market within their own state.

“For example, the No. 1 state (for solar) in the country is California. The no. 2 state is New Jersey, and industrial centers like Ohio's glass capital are turning to solar as well,” both in terms of market and solar-related jobs, he says. Those jobs come both from business coming into the state and from companies serving New Jersey's residential and business customers adopting solar thanks to state incentives.

In the meantime, changes in overseas markets are beginning to drive investors to at least window shop in the state.

In early January, a European investor looking to set up large solar installations toured Tennessee, meeting with state officials in Nashville as well as local business leaders in Knoxville.

Spain, which through aggressive national incentives created the world's No. 1 solar market has since backed off the program, leading companies to seek greener pastures. Germany is also reducing the amount it pays for solar-generated power.

Companies from Europe and elsewhere are “looking at this country as an opportunity,” says Stephen Levy, executive director of the Tennessee Solar Energy Association, which recently was chartered in Knoxville. The group helped coordinate the local meeting with the European investors.

For now, conversation is virtually all that's come of the two polysilicon manufacturers' decision to site plants in Tennessee.

Still, says Strange, “I would say it's positive that they're even thinking about it and asking about it.”

Related News

Germany should stop lecturing France on nuclear power, says Eon boss

EU Nuclear Power Dispute strains electricity market reform as Germany resists state aid for French…
View more

Norway Considers Curbing Electricity Exports to Avoid Shortages

Norway Electricity Export Limits weigh hydro reservoirs, energy security, EU-UK interconnectors, and record power prices…
View more

EIA: Pennsylvania exports the most electricity, California imports the most from other states

U.S. Electricity Trade by State, 2013-2017 highlights EIA grid patterns, interstate imports and exports, cross-border…
View more

Does Providing Electricity To The Poor Reduce Poverty? Maybe Not

Rural Electrification Poverty Impact examines energy access, grid connections, and reliability, testing economic development claims…
View more

Ontario pitches support for electric bills

Ontario CEAP Program provides one-time electricity bill relief for residential consumers via local utilities, supports…
View more

Extreme Heat Boosts U.S. Electricity Bills

Extreme Heat and Rising Electricity Bills amplify energy costs as climate change drives air conditioning…
View more

Sign Up for Electricity Forum’s Newsletter

Stay informed with our FREE Newsletter — get the latest news, breakthrough technologies, and expert insights, delivered straight to your inbox.

Electricity Today T&D Magazine Subscribe for FREE

Stay informed with the latest T&D policies and technologies.
  • Timely insights from industry experts
  • Practical solutions T&D engineers
  • Free access to every issue

Download the 2026 Electrical Training Catalog

Explore 50+ live, expert-led electrical training courses –

  • Interactive
  • Flexible
  • CEU-cerified