A new power source – fuel cells

By Supermarket News


NFPA 70e Training

Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.

  • Live Online
  • 6 hours Instructor-led
  • Group Training Available
Regular Price:
$199
Coupon Price:
$149
Reserve Your Seat Today
Over the past few years, a handful of supermarket companies have been trying out a novel way to generate electrical and heat power in their stores — fuel cells.

Fuel cell technology dates back many decades and has been employed in diverse settings, including buildings, consumer electronics, cars — even the Apollo moon missions. As a commercial source of on-site power, fuel cells have evolved to where they are being increasingly adopted by businesses that need around-the-clock power and can take advantage of the release of heat.

Some examples of fuel cell users in the supermarket industry include two stores operated by Whole Foods Market (with a third coming this year), one Price Chopper, one Star Market and two Wal-Mart supercenters. These stores typically employ a fuel cell in concert with the U.S. electrical grid — with most of the energy coming from the fuel cell — and as a stand-alone generator when the grid is unavailable.

Fuel cells are designed to be efficient, quiet and green. Like batteries, they use electrochemical power, not fossil fuel combustion; unlike batteries, they use a continuous source of fuel like natural gas, from which hydrogen gas is obtained. The hydrogen is made to react with oxygen from the air to generate electricity, heat and water.

Whole Foods' fuel cells are made by UTC Power, South Windsor, Conn. Incorporating phosphoric acid, they are rated a little more than 40% in terms of electricity-producing efficiency, compared to about 35% efficiency achieved by traditional power plants, said Neal Montany, director of UTC's stationary fuel cell business. (Other fuel cell designs differ in efficiency.)

But by capturing the heat it produces, the UTC fuel cell can increase its efficiency to as high as 90%, depending upon how much of the heat is used, Montany said. By contrast, almost two-thirds of the energy potential in traditional power plants is lost to the atmosphere as waste heat or in transmission line losses.

In a San Jose, Calif., Whole Foods store expected to open this fall, the UTC fuel cell system will generate 90% of the store's electricity, and thermal energy will be used for store heating, cooling and refrigeration for an overall efficiency of more than 60%. In a Glastonbury, Conn., Whole Foods store that has used a UTC fuel cell since 2008, the technology's efficiency has cut energy costs by 30% compared to a conventionally powered store.

Carbon dioxide, the principal greenhouse gas, is a by-product of fuel cells — but much less than what is released by the combustion of fossil fuels like coal and petroleum. And unlike fossil-fuel combustion, fuel cells produce virtually no other pollutants. In the Boston market area, a 400 kilowatt fuel cell using natural gas with 60% thermal utilization annually prevents the release of 1,313 metric tons of carbon dioxide and 1.62 metric tons of nitrogen oxides when compared to the electrical grid, while conserving 213,000 gallons of water, according to UTC Power.

The fuel cell's chief drawback is its cost. In stores that have incorporated this technology, the cost has been defrayed by state and federal incentives. However, as more fuel cells are installed, their cost is expected to drop, making them a potential green alternative to conventional power sources.

Whole Foods, based in Austin, Texas, was initially approached by UTC Power in 2006. At that time, hurricanes like Katrina and Rita had left retailers with a need for "larger back-up power requirements," noted Kathy Loftus, global leader, sustainable engineering, maintenance and energy management for Whole Foods, in a session last fall at the Food Marketing Institute's Energy & Technical Services Conference in Indian Wells, Calif. In addition, incentive programs for fuel cells were springing up in several states. Still, she said, the economics justifying an investment "were close, but not there."

A year later, UTC approached Whole Foods again about taking advantage of "lucrative incentives" from the Connecticut Clean Energy Foundation (CCEF) to install a fuel cell at a store being constructed in Glastonbury, not far from UTC's headquarters, said Loftus.

Whole Foods was already well into the design of the Glastonbury store. Moreover, Whole Foods' own engineers weren't sure about how a fuel cell could be incorporated into a supermarket. As a result, there was considerable doubt over whether "we could pull this off," said Loftus.

But the chain decided to move forward, hiring two engineering firms — Energy Efficiency Services, Hopkinton, N.H., and Harriman Associates, Auburn, Maine — as well as UTC, to "hammer out" a plan to use a 200-kilowatt fuel cell in the Glastonbury store, said Loftus. "It helps to have a third-party independent engineer with heavy refrigeration, HVAC and plumbing knowledge," she said.

It's also better to have ample time in the design and engineering process to incorporate a fuel cell - something Whole Foods didn't have with its Glastonbury store but did have with its next fuel cell project, a new store in Dedham, Mass., that opened last fall, and with its current project in San Jose.

The fuel cell began operation in Glastonbury in 2008, generating about half of the store's electrical power load and providing heat for all of its hot water production and about 60% to 80% of the store's overall heating needs, said Willis McCullough, UTC's sales manager for retail and grocery. The system has the ability to produce just enough power to match a store's momentary needs, said Montany. Its up-time is about 99%, including planned maintenance.

In the Glastonbury and Dedham stores, the fuel cell's waste heat is channeled into space heating, dehumidification, domestic water preheating and chilling of liquid refrigerant. This eliminates the need for a hot water boiler and enables the refrigeration compressor to be used less. "Sixty percent of what the fuel cell is producing is heat," Montany said. "Doing something with the heat is really the key to making it viable."

The ability of a fuel cell to integrate with a store's refrigeration system and provide some of the heat necessary to run the system, thereby lessening the burden on electrically driven compressors, is what makes the fuel cell an especially good fit for the supermarket industry, said McCullough.

UTC is working with refrigeration system vendors like Hill Phoenix to help it design its systems to better accommodate the waste heat from the fuel cell.

After the first year, the Glastonbury store's total electrical and heat energy costs, including the cost of additional natural gas needed for the fuel cell, were 30% lower than a comparable store in West Hartford, Conn., said Loftus. On an annual basis, the store reduced its carbon footprint by 90 metric tons and its nitrogen oxide emissions by two metric tons when compared to the electrical grid.

The "cell stack" — the part where the energy is produced — in the 200-kilowatt unit at the Glastonbury store has a five-year lifespan, after which it will be replaced, said Montany. The cell stack and other components of the 400-kilowatt unit have a 10-year lifespan.

Rather than invest in the full up-front cost of a fuel cell — about $4,500 per kilowatt, or $900,000 in Glastonbury and $1.8 million in Dedham — Whole Foods is leasing the system on a monthly basis from UTC Power through a 10-year "energy services agreement." The agreement includes the cost of the unit, installation and all services and associated equipment.

Montany acknowledged that state and federal support is needed at this time to make fuel cells an economically viable energy solution for retailers. "Up-front capital cost is an issue with the introduction of a new technology," he said. "[Government] incentives can offset that until costs go down with greater volume." Currently, the states with the best incentives for fuel cell installations are Connecticut, California, New York, New Jersey and Massachusetts, where Whole Foods received help from the Massachusetts Renewable Energy Trust.

The government incentives, which are received by UTC Power in the case of the leased Whole Foods installations, enable the payback for the investment to fall to three to five years, from 11 years, said Montany.

In Dedham, Whole Foods' 400-kilowatt fuel cell has been operating since December 2009, a few months after the store opened, and the retailer has yet to report an energy savings. The 400-kilowatt model, now the standard version that UTC Power provides, is also being used at a Price Chopper store in Colonie, N.Y., and at a Star Market store in Chestnut Hill, Mass. Stop & Shop plans to begin operating the fuel cell in a new Torrington, Conn., store in a few months, while Whole Foods will use one at its new store under construction in San Jose.

In December and January, Wal-Mart Stores installed a 400-kilowatt solid-oxide fuel cell from Bloom Energy, Sunnyvale, Calif., in two supercenters, located in Lancaster, Calif., and Hemet, Calif., respectively. These fuel cells, which can accommodate up to 60% of the stores' energy needs, do not allow waste heat to be used, but are designed to offer high electrical efficiencies.

Unlike the Glastonbury store, at the Dedham store "the entire fuel cell system was designed into the building documents," said Loftus. The design encompassed mechanical, electrical and plumbing (MEP) elements "up to all points of equipment connection, allowing construction to be a far smoother process" than in Glastonbury, she said.

The Dedham store's fuel cell generates 90% of the power needed by the store. Its integrated design and greater power allows it to generate enough heat for 90% of the store's heating needs — 1.7 million BTUs/hour, double the Glastonbury store's output. Between 50% and 60% of the fuel cell's heat in Dedham is utilized.

The heat from the fuel cell is channeled into four areas in Dedham: a 1-million BTUs/hour hydronic hot water coil in central Seasons-4 HVAC unit, domestic hot water preheating, a receiving area air-handler with a hot water fan coil, and an absorption chiller for rack-mounted liquid refrigerant subcooling.

The UTC fuel cell operates in a grid-connect or a grid-independent mode. In the former, the fuel cell supplies more than 90% of a given electrical load, while the rest comes from the traditional electrical grid. "In this case, we've agreed to manage the fuel cell to produce less than the store demand," said Montany. "If we were to produce more, it would go to the grid. So we need a buffer."

On the other hand, a key benefit to supermarkets is that when the grid goes down — because of a hurricane or some other event — the fuel cell operates in a grid-independent mode, providing uninterrupted power to the store. While traditional back-up generators cover front-end registers and lights, they "can't do much with refrigeration," said Loftus. But when the fuel cell acts as a back-up, it "absolutely" generates enough power to accommodate refrigeration, she said.

And unlike a traditional back-up generator, which has a finite amount of fuel, the fuel cell has a continuous fuel supply and can maintain operation over longer periods of time.

"The goal is to operate all refrigeration, IT/POS equipment and 50% sales area lighting and all back room lighting to continue to operate the store" during a grid outage in Dedham, said Loftus.

At the same time, the fuel cell is electrically isolated from the main service with a transfer switch. "Should anything ever happen to the fuel cell, the store operations will not be affected, even momentarily," said Loftus.

At the Glastonbury and Dedham stores, the fuel cell is located in the back of the building, though it can be placed on a roof or in a basement. "The closer it is to the mechanical and electrical interconnects, the better" because distance increases installation costs, said McCullough.

Related News

Ontario to Provide New and Expanded Energy-Efficiency Programs

Ontario CDM Programs expand energy efficiency, demand response, and DER incentives via IESO's Save on Energy, cutting peak demand, lowering bills, and supporting electrification, retrofits, and LED lighting to meet Ontario's growing electricity needs.

 

Key Points

Ontario CDM Programs are IESO incentives that cut peak demand and energy use via demand response, retrofits and DERs.

✅ Delivered by IESO's Save on Energy to reduce peak demand

✅ Incentives for demand response, retrofits, LEDs, and DER solutions

✅ Help homes, businesses, and greenhouses lower bills and emissions

 

Ontario will be making available four new and expanded energy-efficiency programs, also known as Conservation and Demand Management (CDM) programs, to ensure a reliable, affordable, and clean electricity system, including ultra-low overnight pricing options to power the province, drive electrification and support strong economic growth. As there will be a need for additional electricity capacity in Ontario beginning in 2025, and continuing through the decade, CDM programs are among the fastest and most cost-effective ways of meeting electricity system needs.

 

Conservation and Demand Management

The Ontario government launched the 2021-2024 CDM Framework on January 1, 2021. The framework focuses on cost-effectively meeting the needs of Ontario’s electricity system, including by focusing on the achievement of provincial peak demand reductions and initiatives such as extended off-peak electricity rates, as well as on targeted approaches to address regional and/or local electricity system needs.

CDM programs are delivered by the Independent Electricity System Operator (IESO), which implemented staff lockdown measures during COVID-19, through the Save on Energy brand. These programs address electricity system needs and help consumers reduce their electricity consumption to lower their bills. CDM programs and incentives are available for homeowners, small businesses, large businesses, and contractors, and First Nations communities.

 

New and Expanded Programs

The four new and expanded CDM programs will include:

A new Residential Demand Response Program for homes with existing central air conditioning and smart thermostats to help deliver peak demand reductions. Households who meet the criteria could voluntarily enroll in this program and, alongside protections like disconnection moratoriums for residential customers, be paid an incentive in return for the IESO being able to reduce their cooling load on a select number of summer afternoons to reduce peak demand. There are an estimated 600,000 smart thermostats installed in Ontario.
Targeted support for greenhouses in Southwest Ontario, including incentives to install LED lighting, non-lighting measures or behind-the-meter distributed energy resources (DER), such as combined solar generation and battery storage.
Enhancements to the Save On Energy Retrofit Program for business, municipalities, institutional and industrial consumers to include custom energy-efficiency projects. Examples of potential projects could include chiller and other HVAC upgrades for a local arena, building automation and air handling systems for a hospital, or building envelope upgrades for a local business.
Enhancements to the Local Initiatives Program to reduce barriers to participation and to add flexibility for incentives for DER solutions.
It is the government’s intention that the new and expanded CDM programs will be available to eligible electricity customers beginning in Spring 2023.

The IESO estimates that the new program offers will deliver total provincial peak electricity demand savings of 285 megawatts (MW) and annual energy savings of 1.1 terawatt hours (TWh) by 2025, reflecting pandemic-era electricity usage shifts across Ontario. Savings will persist beyond 2025 with a total reduction in system costs by approximately $650 million over the lifetime of the measures, and will support economic recovery, as seen with electricity relief during COVID-19 measures, decarbonization and energy cost management for homes and businesses.

These enhancements will have a particular impact in Southwest Ontario, with regional peak demand savings of 225 MW, helping to alleviate electricity system constraints in the region and foster economic development, supported by stable electricity pricing for industrial and commercial companies in Ontario.

The overall savings from this CDM programming will result in an estimated three million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions reductions over the lifetime of the energy-efficiency measures to help achieve Ontario’s climate targets and protect the environment for the future.

The IESO will be updating the CDM Framework Program Plan, which provides a detailed breakdown of program budgets and energy savings and peak demand targets expected to be achieved.

 

Related News

View more

Sustainable Marine now delivering electricity to Nova Scotia grid from tidal energy

Sustainable Marine tidal energy delivers in-stream power to Nova Scotia's grid from Grand Passage, proving low-impact, renewable generation and advancing a floating tidal array at FORCE and Minas Passage in the Bay of Fundy.

 

Key Points

The first in-stream tidal project supplying clean power to Nova Scotia's grid, proven at Grand Passage.

✅ First to deliver in-stream tidal power to Canada's grid

✅ Demonstration at Grand Passage informs FORCE deployments

✅ Low-impact design and environmental monitoring validated

 

Sustainable Marine has officially powered up its tidal energy operation in Canada and is delivering clean electricity to the power system in Nova Scotia, on the country’s Atlantic coast, as the province moves to increase wind and solar projects in the years ahead. The company’s system in Grand Passage is the first to deliver in-stream tidal power to the grid in Canada, following provincial approval to harness Bay of Fundy tides that is spurring further development.

The system start-up is the culmination of more than a decade of research, development and testing, including lessons from Scottish tidal projects in recent years and a powerful tidal turbine feeding onshore grids, managing the technical challenges associated with operating in highly energetic environments and proving the ultra-low environmental impact of the tidal technology.

Sustainable Marine is striving to deliver the world’s first floating tidal array at FORCE (Fundy Ocean Research Centre for Energy). This project will be delivered in phases, drawing upon the knowledge gained and lessons learned in Grand Passage, and insights from offshore wind pilots like France’s first offshore wind turbine in Europe. In the coming months the company will continue to operate the platform at its demonstration site at Grand Passage, gradually building up power production, while New York and New England clean energy demand continues to rise, to further prove the technology and environmental monitoring systems, before commencing deployments in the Minas Passage – renowned as the Everest of tidal energy.

The Bay of Fundy’s huge tidal energy resource contains more than four times the combined flow of every freshwater river in the world, with the potential to generate approximately 2,500 MW of green energy, underscoring why independent electricity planning will be important for integrating marine renewables.

 

Related News

View more

TTC Bans Lithium-Ion-Powered E-Bikes and Scooters During Winter Months for Safety

TTC Winter E-Bike and E-Scooter Ban addresses lithium-ion battery safety, mitigating fire risk on Toronto public transit during cold weather across buses, subways, and streetcars, while balancing micro-mobility access, infrastructure gaps, and evolving regulations.

 

Key Points

A seasonal TTC policy limiting lithium-ion e-bikes and scooters on transit in winter to cut battery fire risk.

✅ Targets lithium-ion fire hazards in confined transit spaces

✅ Applies Nov-Mar across buses, subways, and streetcars

✅ Sparks debate on equity, accessibility, and policy alternatives

 

The Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) Board recently voted to implement a ban on lithium-ion-powered electric bikes (e-bikes) and electric scooters during the winter months, a decision that reflects growing safety concerns. This new policy has generated significant debate within the city, particularly regarding the role of these transportation modes in the lives of Torontonians, and the potential risks posed by the technology during cold weather.

A Growing Safety Concern

The move to ban lithium-ion-powered e-bikes and scooters from TTC services during the winter months stems from increasing safety concerns related to battery fires. Lithium-ion batteries, commonly used in e-bikes and scooters, are known to pose a fire risk, especially in colder temperatures, and as systems like Metro Vancouver's battery-electric buses expand, robust safety practices are paramount. In recent years, Toronto has experienced several high-profile incidents involving fires caused by these batteries. In some cases, these fires have occurred on TTC property, including on buses and subway cars, raising alarm among transit officials.

The TTC Board's decision was largely driven by the fear that the cold temperatures during winter months could make lithium-ion batteries more prone to malfunction, leading to potential fires. These batteries are particularly vulnerable to damage when exposed to low temperatures, which can cause them to overheat or fail during charging or use. Since public transit systems are densely populated and rely on close quarters, the risk of a battery fire in a confined space such as a bus or subway is considered too high.

The New Ban

The new rule, which is expected to take effect in the coming months, will prohibit e-bikes and scooters powered by lithium-ion batteries from being brought onto TTC vehicles, including buses, streetcars, and subway trains, even as the agency rolls out battery electric buses across its fleet, during the winter months. While the TTC had previously allowed passengers to bring these devices on board, it had issued warnings regarding their safety. The policy change reflects a more cautious approach to mitigating risk in light of growing concerns.

The winter months, typically from November to March, are when these batteries are at their most vulnerable. In addition to environmental factors, the challenges posed by winter weather—such as snow, ice, and the damp conditions—can exacerbate the potential for damage to these devices. The TTC Board hopes the new ban will prevent further incidents and keep transit riders safe.

Pushback and Debate

Not everyone agrees with the TTC Board's decision. Some residents and advocacy groups have expressed concern that this ban unfairly targets individuals who rely on e-bikes and scooters as an affordable and sustainable mode of transportation, while international examples like Paris's e-scooter vote illustrate how contentious rental devices can be elsewhere, adding fuel to the debate. E-bikes, in particular, have become a popular choice among commuters who want an eco-friendly alternative to driving, especially in a city like Toronto, where traffic congestion can be severe.

Advocates argue that instead of an outright ban, the TTC should invest in safer infrastructure, such as designated storage areas for e-bikes and scooters, or offer guidelines on how to safely store and transport these devices during winter, and, in assessing climate impacts, consider Canada's electricity mix alongside local safety measures. They also point out that other forms of electric transportation, such as electric wheelchairs and mobility scooters, are not subject to the same restrictions, raising questions about the fairness of the new policy.

In response to these concerns, the TTC has assured the public that it remains committed to finding alternative solutions that balance safety with accessibility. Transit officials have stated that they will continue to monitor the situation and consider adjustments to the policy if necessary.

Broader Implications for Transportation in Toronto

The TTC’s decision to ban lithium-ion-powered e-bikes and scooters is part of a broader conversation about the future of transportation in urban centers like Toronto. The rise of electric micro-mobility devices has been seen as a step toward reducing carbon emissions and addressing the city’s growing congestion issues, aligning with Canada's EV goals that push for widespread adoption. However, as more people turn to e-bikes and scooters for daily commuting, concerns about safety and infrastructure have become more pronounced.

The city of Toronto has yet to roll out comprehensive regulations for electric scooters and bikes, and this issue is further complicated by the ongoing push for sustainable urban mobility and pilots like driverless electric shuttles that test new models. While transit authorities grapple with safety risks, the public is increasingly looking for ways to integrate these devices into a broader, more holistic transportation system that prioritizes both convenience and safety.

The TTC’s decision to ban lithium-ion-powered e-bikes and scooters during the winter months is a necessary step to address growing safety concerns in Toronto's public transit system. Although the decision has been met with some resistance, it highlights the ongoing challenges in managing the growing use of electric transportation in urban environments, where initiatives like TTC's electric bus fleet offer lessons on scaling safely. With winter weather exacerbating the risks associated with lithium-ion batteries, the policy seeks to reduce the chances of fires and ensure the safety of all transit users. As the city moves forward, it will need to find ways to balance innovation with public safety to create a more sustainable and safe urban transportation network.

 

Related News

View more

Can COVID-19 accelerate funding for access to electricity?

Africa Energy Access Funding faces disbursement bottlenecks as SDG 7 goals demand investment in decentralized solar, minigrids, and rural electrification; COVID-19 pressures donors, requiring faster approvals, standardized documentation, and stronger project preparation and due diligence.

 

Key Points

Financing to expand Africa's electrification, advancing SDG 7 via disbursement to decentralized solar and minigrids.

✅ Accelerates investment for SDG 7 and rural electrification

✅ Prioritizes decentralized solar, minigrids, and utilities

✅ Speeds approvals, standard docs, and project preparation

 

The time frame from final funding approval to disbursement can be the most painful part of any financing process, and the access-to-electricity sector is not spared.

Amid the global spread of the coronavirus over the last few weeks, there have been several funding pledges to promote access to electricity in Africa. In March, the African Development Bank and other partners committed $160 million for the Facility for Energy Inclusion to boost electricity connectivity in Africa through small-scale solar systems and minigrids. Similarly, the Export-Import Bank of the United States allocated $91.5 million for rural electrification in Senegal.

Rockefeller chief wants to redefine 'energy poverty'

Rajiv Shah, president of The Rockefeller Foundation, believes that SDG 7 on energy access lacks ambition. He hopes to drive an effort to redefine it.

Currently, funding is not being adequately deployed to help achieve universal access to energy. The International Energy Agency’s “Africa Energy Outlook 2019” report estimated that an almost fourfold increase in current annual access-to-electricity investments — approximately $120 billion a year over the next 20 years — is required to provide universal access to electricity for the 530 million people in Africa that still lack it.

While decentralized renewable energy across communities, particularly solar, has been instrumental in serving the hardest-to-reach populations, tracking done by Sustainable Energy for All — in the 20 countries with about 80% of those living without access to sustainable energy — suggests that decentralized solar received only 1.2% of the total electricity funding.

The spread of COVID-19 is contributing significantly to Africa’s electricity challenges across the region, creating a surge in the demand for energy from the very important health facilities, an exponential increase in daytime demand as a result of most people staying and working indoors, and a rise from some food processing companies that have scaled up their business operations to help safeguard food security, among others. Thankfully — and rightly so — access-to-electricity providers are increasingly being recognized as “essential service” providers amid the lockdowns across cities.

To start tackling Africa’s electricity challenges more effectively, “funding-ready” energy providers must be able to access and fulfill the required conditions to draw down on the already pledged funding. What qualifies as “funding readiness” is open to argument, but having a clear, commercially viable business and revenue model that is suitable for the target market is imperative.

Developing the skills required to navigate the due-diligence process and put together relevant project documents is critical and sometimes challenging for companies without prior experience. Typically, the final form of all project-related agreements is a prerequisite for the final funding approval.

In addition, having the right internal structures in place — for example, controls to prevent revenue leakage, an experienced management team, a credible board of directors, and meeting relevant regulatory requirements such as obtaining permits and licenses — are also important indicators of funding readiness.

1. Support for project preparation. Programs — such as the Private Financing Advisory Network and GET.invest’s COVID-19 window — that provide business coaching to energy project developers are key to helping surmount these hurdles and to increasing the chances of these projects securing funding or investment. Donor funding and technical-assistance facilities should target such programs.

2. Project development funds. Equity for project development is crucial but difficult to attract. Special funds to meet this need are essential, such as the $760,000 for the development of small-scale renewable energy projects across sub-Saharan Africa recently approved by the African Development Bank-managed Sustainable Energy Fund for Africa.

3. Standardized investment documentation. Even when funding-ready energy project developers have secured investors, delays in fulfilling the typical preconditions to draw down funds have been a major concern. This is a good time for investors to strengthen their technical assistance by supporting the standardization of approval documents and funding agreements across the energy sector to fast-track the disbursement of funds.

4. Bundled investment approvals and more frequent approval sessions. While we implement mechanisms to hasten the drawdown of already pledged funding, there is no better time to accelerate decision-making for new access-to-electricity funding to ensure we are better prepared to weather the next storm. Donors and investors should review their processes to be more flexible and allow for more frequent meetings of investment committees and boards to approve transactions. Transaction reviews and approvals can also be conducted for bundled projects to reduce transaction costs.

5. Strengthened local capacity. African countries must also commit to strengthening the local manufacturing and technical capacity for access-to-electricity components through fiscal incentives such as extended tax holidays, value-added-tax exemptions, accelerated capital allowances, and increased investment allowances.

The ongoing pandemic and resulting impacts due to lack of electricity have further shown the need to increase the pace of implementation of access-to-electricity projects. We know that some of the required capital exists, and much more is needed to achieve Sustainable Development Goal 7 — about access to affordable and clean energy for all — by 2030.

It is time to accelerate our support for access-to-electricity companies and equip them to draw down on pledged funding, while calling on donors and investors to speed up their funding processes to ensure the electricity gets to those most in need.

 

Related News

View more

Canadian Gov't and PEI invest in new transmission line to support wind energy production

Skinners Pond Transmission Line expands PEI's renewable energy grid, enabling wind power integration, grid reliability, and capacity for the planned 40 MW windfarm, funded through the Green Infrastructure Stream to support sustainable economic growth.

 

Key Points

A 106-km grid project enabling PEI wind power, increasing capacity and reliability, linking Skinners Pond to Sherbrooke.

✅ 106-km line connects Skinners Pond to Sherbrooke substation

✅ Integrates 40 MW windfarm capacity by 2025

✅ Funded by Canada and PEI via Green Infrastructure Stream

 

The health and well-being of Canadians are the top priorities of the Governments of Canada and Prince Edward Island. But the COVID-19 pandemic has affected more than Canadians' personal health. It is having a profound effect on the economy.

That is why governments have been taking decisive action together to support families, businesses and communities, and continue to look ahead to planning for our electricity future and see what more can be done.

Today, Bobby Morrissey, Member of Parliament for Egmont, on behalf of the Honourable Catherine McKenna, Minister of Infrastructure and Communities, the Honourable Dennis King, Premier of Prince Edward Island, the Honourable Dennis King, Premier of Prince Edward Island, and the Honourable Steven Myers, Prince Edward Island Minister of Transportation, Infrastructure and Energy, announced funding to build a new transmission line from Sherbrooke to Skinners Pond, as part of broader Canadian collaboration on clean energy, with several premiers nuclear reactor technology to support future needs as well.

The new 106-kilometre transmission line and its related equipment will support future wind energy generation projects in western Prince Edward Island, complementing the Eastern Kings wind farm expansion already advancing. Once completed, the transmission line will increase the province's capacity to manage the anticipated 40 megawatts from the future Skinner's Pond Windfarm planned for 2025 and provide connectivity to the Sherbrooke substation to the northeast of Summerside.

The Government of Canada is investing $21.25 million and the Government of Prince Edward Island is providing $22.75 million in this project, reflecting broader investments in new turbines across Canada, through the Green Infrastructure Stream (GIS) of the Investing in Canada infrastructure program.

This projects is one in a series of important project announcements that will be made across the province over the coming weeks. The Governments of Canada and Prince Edward Island are working cooperatively to support jobs, improve communities and build confidence, while safely and sustainably restoring economic growth, as Nova Scotia increases wind and solar projects across the region.

"Investing in renewable energy infrastructure is essential to building healthy, inclusive, and resilient communities. The new Skinners Pond transmission line will support Prince Edward Island's production of green energy, focusing on wind resources rather than expanded biomass use in the mix. Projects like this also support economic growth and help us build a greener future for the next generation of Islanders."

Bobby Morrissey, Member of Parliament for Egmont, on behalf of the Honourable Catherine McKenna, Minister of Infrastructure and Communities

"We live on an Island that has tremendous potential in further developing renewable energy. We have an opportunity to become more sustainable and be innovative in our approach, and learn from regions where provinces like Manitoba have clean energy to help neighbouring provinces through interties. The strategic investment we are making today in the Skinner's Pond transmission line will allow Prince Edward Island to further harness the natural power of wind to create clean, locally produced and locally used energy that will benefit of all Islanders."

 

Related News

View more

U.S. Senate Looks to Modernize Renewable Energy on Public Land

PLREDA 2019 advances solar, wind, and geothermal on public lands, guiding DOI siting, improving transmission access, streamlining permitting, sharing revenues, and funding conservation to meet climate goals while protecting wildlife and recreation.

 

Key Points

A bipartisan bill to expand renewables on public lands fund conservation, speed permitting and advance U.S. climate aims.

✅ Targets 25 GW of public-land renewables by 2025

✅ Establishes wildlife conservation and recreation access funds

✅ Streamlines siting, transmission, and equitable revenue sharing

 

The Senate unveiled its version of a bill the House introduced in July to help the U.S. realize the extraordinary renewable energy potential of our shared public lands.

Senator Martha McSally (R-AZ) and a bipartisan coalition of western Senators introduced a Senate version of draft legislation that will help the Department of the Interior tap the renewable energy potential of our shared public lands. The western Senators represent Arizona, New Mexico, Colorado, Montana, and Idaho.

Elsewhere in the West, lawmakers have moved to modernize Oregon hydropower to streamline licensing, signaling broad regional momentum.

The Public Land Renewable Energy Development Act of 2019 (PLREDA) facilitates siting of solar, wind, and geothermal energy projects on public lands, boosts funding for conservation, and promotes ambitious renewable energy targets that will help the U.S. take action on the climate crisis.

Like the House version, the Senate bill enjoys strong bi-partisan support and industry endorsement. The Senate version makes few notable changes to the bill introduced in July by Representatives Mike Levin (D-CA) and Paul Gosar (R-AZ). It includes:

  • A commitment to enhance natural resource conservation and stewardship via the establishment of a fish and wildlife conservation fund that would support conservation and restoration work and other important stewardship activities.
  • An ambitious renewable energy production goal for the Department of the Interior to permit a total of 25 gigawatts of renewable energy on public lands by 2025—nearly double the current generating capacity of projects currently on our public lands.
  • Establishment of criteria for identifying appropriate areas for renewable energy development using the 2012 Western Solar Plan as a model. Key criteria to be considered include access to transmission lines and likelihood of avoiding or minimizing conflict with wildlife habitat, cultural resources, and other resources and values.
  • Improved public access to Federal lands for recreational uses via funds made available for preserving and improving access, including enhancing public access to places that are currently inaccessible or restricted.
  • Sharing of revenues raised from renewable energy development on public lands in an equitable manner that benefits local communities near new renewable energy projects and supports the efficient administration of permitting requirements.
  • Creating incentives for renewable energy development by giving Interior the authority to reduce rental rates and capacity fees to ensure new renewable energy development remains competitive in the marketplace.

NRDC strongly supports this legislation, and we will do our utmost to facilitate its passage into law. There is no question that in our era of runaway climate change, legislation that balances energy production with environmental conservation and stewardship of our public lands is critical.

PLREDA takes a balanced approach to using our public lands to help lead the U.S. toward a low-carbon future, as states pursue 100% renewable electricity goals nationwide. The bill outlines a commonsense approach for federal agencies to play a meaningful role in combatting climate change.

 

Related News

View more

Sign Up for Electricity Forum’s Newsletter

Stay informed with our FREE Newsletter — get the latest news, breakthrough technologies, and expert insights, delivered straight to your inbox.

Electricity Today T&D Magazine Subscribe for FREE

Stay informed with the latest T&D policies and technologies.
  • Timely insights from industry experts
  • Practical solutions T&D engineers
  • Free access to every issue

Download the 2025 Electrical Training Catalog

Explore 50+ live, expert-led electrical training courses –

  • Interactive
  • Flexible
  • CEU-cerified