Why Progress charges Florida customers more than others


Substation Relay Protection Training

Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.

  • Live Online
  • 12 hours Instructor-led
  • Group Training Available
Regular Price:
$699
Coupon Price:
$599
Reserve Your Seat Today

Progress Energy Florida Rates highlight higher electricity prices per kWh, driven by fuel mix, limited nuclear power, base-rate surcharges, and utility regulation by the Florida Public Service Commission during ongoing rate cases.

 

Essential Takeaways

Progress Energy Florida rates exceed Carolinas due to fuel mix costs, lower nuclear share, and base-rate surcharges.

  • Florida: $127.13 per 1,000 kWh; SC: $100.90; NC: $106.78.
  • Annual gap vs SC equals $314 for 12,000 kWh.
  • Florida nuclear share 14%; Carolinas 46% at lower cost.
  • Levy County nuclear project estimated $17B to $20B.

 

How can a business that makes exactly the same product in three nearby states charge 25 percent more in one state than another?

 

Meet Progress Energy, the North Carolina company that supplies electricity to large portions of North Carolina, South Carolina and Central Florida, via its Progress Energy Florida subsidiary in St. Petersburg, where peak-demand record was recently set by customers.

In North Carolina, Progress Energy charges residential customers $106.78 for the first 1,000 kilowatt hours.

In South Carolina, it charges residential customers $100.90 for 1,000 kwh.

And in Florida? Progress Florida customers pay $127.13 for the same amount of electricity.

Over the course of a year, that $26.23 higher price tag for 1,000 kwh adds up to Florida customers paying $314 more than South Carolina customers for the same amount of electricity.

That's a big difference in these trying economic times, especially in hard-hit Florida, where empty homes have cut into utility income.

Progress Energy points out that its rates depend on a different mix of power plants and fuels — each one priced differently — used in each of its states to generate electricity. The company's Florida power plants have relied on a mix of coal, oil, natural gas, nuclear power and some alternative energies to generate electricity. The mix in Florida costs the company more than the fuel mixes in the Carolinas.

A key difference is nuclear power. Progress Energy has a lot more nukes in the Carolinas, which can generate 46 percent of the required electricity at the lowest cost compared to other fuels.

In Florida, Progress Energy has one nuclear power plant, producing 14 percent of customers' electric needs, based at its Crystal River facility in Citrus County. The company wants to build another nuke plant, consisting of two reactors, in Levy County.

The trick is, the Levy County nuclear power plants should generate lots of cost-efficient electricity — once they are up and running. But the price tag for those plants is somewhere between $17 billion and $20 billion and, no doubt, is much more likely to rise than drop in the coming years of construction and regulatory oversight.

Progress Energy Florida persuaded state legislators to let it charge Florida customers in advance to help pay for a good piece of the nuke plants, even though the plants, originally slated to open in 2016, now are expected to start operating closer to 2018.

When higher rate hikes kicked in early this year, they sparked a mini revolt as Florida customers questioned high rates across the service area. Progress Energy responded by lowering rates temporarily but also sought an increase in "base," or permanent, rates for the coming years.

The Florida Public Service Commission, the state regulator of monopoly industries such as electric utilities, will soon consider the request for higher base rates, even as two PSC staffers resigned during a nuclear-plant review and while it weighs an FPL rate hike to defray costs.

So how did Floridians start paying between $20 and $26 more than folks in the Carolinas for the same amount of electricity?

Related News

Cost, safety drive line-burying decisions at Tucson Electric Power

TEP Undergrounding Policy prioritizes selective underground power lines to manage wildfire risk, engineering costs, and…
View more

Seven small UK energy suppliers must pay renewables fees or risk losing licence

Ofgem Renewables Obligations drive supplier payments for renewables fees, feed-in tariffs, and renewable generation, with…
View more

Jolting the brain's circuits with electricity is moving from radical to almost mainstream therapy

Brain Stimulation is transforming neuromodulation, from TMS and DBS to closed loop devices, targeting neural…
View more

Amazon launches new clean energy projects in US, UK

Amazon Renewable Energy Projects advance net zero goals with a Scotland wind farm PPA and…
View more

The Innovative Solution Bringing Electricity To Crisis Stricken Areas

Toyota and Honda Moving e delivers hydrogen backup power via a fuel cell bus, portable…
View more

Tube Strikes Disrupt London Economy

London Tube Strikes Economic Impact highlights transport disruption reducing foot traffic, commuter flows, and tourism,…
View more

Sign Up for Electricity Forum’s Newsletter

Stay informed with our FREE Newsletter — get the latest news, breakthrough technologies, and expert insights, delivered straight to your inbox.

Electricity Today T&D Magazine Subscribe for FREE

Stay informed with the latest T&D policies and technologies.
  • Timely insights from industry experts
  • Practical solutions T&D engineers
  • Free access to every issue

Download the 2026 Electrical Training Catalog

Explore 50+ live, expert-led electrical training courses –

  • Interactive
  • Flexible
  • CEU-cerified