Wind farm threatened by climate penalty
Greater Wellington regional council is proposing to build 30 three-megawatt turbines on ridges at Puketiro, northeast of Pauatahanui, by 2010. Between 100 and 120 hectares of pine trees would be cut down for the wind farm, the environmental cost of which, according to the Government proposals, would be $13,000 a hectare.
If such a charge were imposed on Puketiro, the regional council would be liable for a bill of between $1.3million and $1.5 million.
The council says it is ludicrous that a project to produce renewable energy should be threatened with climate change charges.
A council briefing paper says paying the Government to create a wind farm would be "bizarre". If such a charge were imposed, council officers could recommend the project be stopped. "Hopefully a more reasoned approach by the Government will prevail."
Forestry Minister Jim Anderton said the Government had a preference for tradeable permits, by which forestry owners pay to change land use, over a flat deforestation charge. It was still working through climate change policy and would not want renewable energy projects "stymied when the net gain for New Zealand is positive".
Council utility services committee chairman Rex Kirton said that, though the Government had not finalised its deforestation management plan, a $1.5 million charge was "just ludicrous". "You are being penalised for the removal of some junky trees."
Water supply, parks and forests divisional manager Murray Kennedy said the Government had not replied to a request for Puketiro to be exempt from any charges. "The sooner a decision is made by the Government, we would welcome it."
Wind farm specialist RES has been contracted to develop the project. Mr Kennedy would not say how much it would cost the council to cancel the contract.
Related News

Are major changes coming to your electric bill?
LOS ANGELES - California’s electric bills — already some of the highest in the nation — are rising, but regulators are debating a new plan to charge customers based on their income level.
Typically what you pay for electricity depends on how much you use. But the state’s three largest electric utilities — Southern California Edison Company, Pacific Gas and Electric Company and San Diego Gas & Electric Company — have proposed a plan to charge customers not just for how much energy they use, but also based on their household income. Their proposal is one of several state regulators received…